053-7 Wyo. Code R. § 7-7 - Exercise of any Right Afforded by the Act
(a) In addition to
protecting employees who file complaints, institute proceedings, or testify in
proceedings under or related to the act,
W.S.
27-11-109(e) also protects
employees from discrimination occurring because of the exercise "of any right
afforded by this act." Certain rights are explicitly provided in the act; for
example, there is a right to participate as a party in enforcement proceedings
in W.S. W.S. 27-11-104. Certain other
rights exist by necessary implication. For example, employees may request
information from the Department; such requests would constitute the exercise of
a right afforded by the act. Likewise, employees interviewed by Department
representatives in the course of inspections or investigations could not
subsequently be discriminated against because of their cooperation.
(i) There is no right afforded by the act,
which would entitle employees to walk off the job because of potential unsafe
conditions at the workplace. Hazardous conditions, which may be violative of
the act, should be corrected by the employer, once brought to his attention. If
corrections are not accomplished, or if there is dispute about the existence of
a hazard, the employee will normally have opportunity to request inspection of
the workplace pursuant to Chapter 3, Section
3 of these rules, or to seek the assistance
of other governmental agencies, which have responsibility in the field of
safety and health.
Under such circumstances, an employer would not be in violation of W.S. W.S. 27-11-109(e) by taking action to discipline an employee for refusing to perform normal job activities because of alleged safety or health hazards.
(ii) Occasions might arise when an employee
is confronted with a choice between not performing assigned tasks or subjecting
himself to serious injury or death arising from a hazardous condition at the
workplace. If the employee, with no reasonable alternative, refuses in good
faith to expose himself to the dangerous condition, he would be protected
against subsequent discrimination. The condition causing the employee's
apprehension of death or injury must be of such a nature that a reasonable
person, under the circumstances then confronting the employee, would conclude
that there is a real danger of death or serious injury and that there is
insufficient time, due to the urgency of the situation, to eliminate the danger
through resort to regular statutory enforcement channels. In addition, in such
circumstances, the employee, where possible, must also have sought from his
employer, and been unable to obtain, a correction of the dangerous
condition.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.