Search

Search results

1. RETURN MAIL, INC. v. POSTAL SERVICE

   proceedings, see Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U. S. 624, 645, the MPEP does not justify putting aside the presumptive ... interpretations as well.” Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U. S. 624, 645 (1998). But there is no “settled” meaning of the ...

2. CRAWFORD v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OFNASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON CTY.

   (quoting Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U. S. 624, 642 (1998))). It is true that one can imagine exceptions, like ... discriminatory activity in their operations because Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U. S. 742, and ... Faragher v. Boca Raton, 524 U. S. 775, hold “[a]n employer … subject to vicarious liability to ...

3. CRAWFORD v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OFNASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON CTY.

   (quoting Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U. S. 624, 642 (1998))). It is true that one can imagine exceptions, like ... discriminatory activity in their operations because Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U. S. 742, and ... Faragher v. Boca Raton, 524 U. S. 775, hold “[a]n employer … subject to vicarious liability to ...

4. LIGHTFOOT v. CENDANT MORTGAGE CORP.

   matter, that the new provision has that same meaning. See Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U. S. 624, 645 (1998). ...

5. LAMAR, ARCHER & COFRIN, LLP v. APPLING

   and to adopt that interpretation when it re-enacts a statute without change”); Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 ... U. S. 624, 645 (1998) (“When administrative and judicial interpretations have settled the meaning of an ...

6. UNITED STATES v. HAYES

   interpretations as well.’ ” (quoting Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U. S. 624, 645 (1998))). Relying on ...

7. UNITED STATES v. HAYES

   interpretations as well.’ ” (quoting Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U. S. 624, 645 (1998))). Relying on ...

8. ARMSTRONG v. EXCEPTIONAL CHILD CENTER, INC.

   interpretation. Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U. S. 624, 645 (1998). But that canon has no application here. The language ... Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn., 496 U. S. 498, 504–505, 524 (1990). The Boren Amendment employed ...

9. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. v. HOLOWECKI

   and litigants may properly resort for guidance.’ ” Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U. S. 624 ...

10. TOYOTA MOTOR MFG., KY., INC. v. WILLIAMS

    interpretations. Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U. S. 624, 631 (1998); FDIC v. Philadelphia Gear Corp., 476 U. S. 426, 437 ... assistance. Bragdon v. Abbott, supra, at 632 (citing Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Darrone, 465 U. S. 624 ... Albertson’s, Inc. v. Kirkingburg, supra, at 566; cf. Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U. S., at 641–642 (relying ...

Pages