Highlights of the Supreme Court's 2002-2003 Term
References for Moseley v. V Secret Catalog, Inc. (March 4, 2003)

Prior Opinions

  • U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky, Filed: Feb. 9, 2000 (WPD)
  • U.S. Court of Appeals - 6th Circuit, Filed: July 30, 1999 (PDF)

  • Pleadings, Motions, & Arguments

  • Respondent's Brief (PDF)
  • Supreme Court Oral Arguments (PDF)

  • Amicus Briefs

    In support of Moseley

  • Professor Malla Pollack (PDF)
  • Public Knowledge, et al. (PDF)
  • In support of V Secret Catalog

  • American Bar Association (PDF)
  • American Intellectual Property Law Association (PDF)
  • Best Western International, Inc., et al. (PDF)
  • Intel Corporation (PDF)
  • Intellectual Property Law Professors (PDF)
  • Intellectual Property Owners Association (PDF)
  • International Trademark Association (PDF)
  • Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., et al. (PDF)
  • United States Solicitor General (PDF)

  • Articles & Commentary

  • Supreme Court Docket Report, Appellate.net (April 2002)
  • Supreme Court Rules For Sex Shop In Trademark Case, CNN.com (March 2003)
  • Court: Victoria's Secret Not Hurt by Sound-Alike Shop, USATODAY.com (March 2003)
  • "Actual Harm" - A Prerequisite to Relief Under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act, RKMC.com (March 2003)
  • A Boost For Cybersquatters?, InternetNews.com (March 2003)
  • A Trademark Victory For The Little Guy, Jurist (March 2003)

  • Other References

  • Supreme Court Docket
  • Medill School of Journalism
  • Federal Trademark Dilution Information
  • Trademark Law's Little Secret: Dilution
  • Trademark Dilution and the Plain Language Solution to Victoria's Secret