The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U. S. ___ (2016).
Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Alito joins, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand in these cases: The Court has held the petitions in these and many other cases pending the decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U. S. ___ (2016). In holding these petitions and now vacating and remanding the judgments below, the Court has not assessed whether petitioners’ asserted entitlement to retroactive relief “is properly presented in the case.” Id., at ___ (slip op., at 13). On remand, courts should understand that the Court’s disposition of these petitions does not reflect any view regarding petitioners’ entitlement to relief. The Court’s disposition does not, for example, address whether an adequate and independent state ground bars relief, whether petitioners forfeited or waived any entitlement to relief (by, for example, entering into a plea agreement waiving any entitlement to relief), or whether petitioners’ sentences actually qualify as mandatory life without parole sentences.
15-6584THOMPSON, STAFON E. V. ROY, COMM'R, MN DOC
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U. S. ___ (2016).
Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Alito joins, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand in this ca0se: The Court has held the petition in this and many other cases pending the decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U. S. ___ (2016). In holding this petition and now vacating and remanding the judgment below, the Court has not assessed whether petitioner’s asserted entitlement to retroactive relief “is properly presented in the case.” Id., at ___ (slip op., at 13). On remand, courts should understand that the Court’s disposition of this petition does not reflect any view regarding petitioner’s entitlement to relief. The Court’s disposition does not, for example, address whether an adequate and independent state ground bars relief, whether petitioner forfeited or waived any entitlement to relief (by, for example, entering into a plea agreement waiving any entitlement to relief), or whether petitioner’s sentence actually qualifies as a mandatory life without parole sentence.
15-7255BAKER, ALBERT V. ALABAMA
15-7441DUKE, MARK V. ALABAMA
15-7550PRESLEY, MARCUS D. V. ALABAMA
The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U. S. ___ (2016).
Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Alito joins, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand in these cases: The Court has held the petitions in these and many other cases pending the decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U. S. ___ (2016). In holding these petitions and now vacating and remanding the judgments below, the Court has not assessed whether petitioners’ asserted entitlement to retroactive relief “is properly presented in the case.” Id., at ___ (slip op., at 13). On remand, courts should understand that the Court’s disposition of these petitions does not reflect any view regarding petitioners’ entitlement to relief. The Court’s disposition does not, for example, address whether an adequate and independent state ground bars relief, whether petitioners forfeited or waived any entitlement to relief (by, for example, entering into a plea agreement waiving any entitlement to relief), or whether petitioners’ sentences actually qualify as mandatory life without parole sentences.
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
15M88VEHICLE INTELLIGENCE AND SAFETY V. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, ET AL.
The motion of Kevin Roe, pro se, to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari on behalf of Vehicle Intelligence and Safety is denied.
14-1091DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY V. INDUSTRIAL POLYMERS, INC., ET AL.
The joint motion to hold petition in abeyance is granted.
14-1457BETTERMAN, BRANDON THOMAS V. MONTANA
The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted.
14-9496MANUEL, ELIJAH V. JOLIET, IL, ET AL.
The motion of petitioner for appointment of counsel is granted and Stanley B. Eisenhammer, Esquire, of Arlington Heights, Illinois, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.
15-446CUOZZO SPEED TECHNOLOGIES V. LEE, MICHELLE K.
The motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted.
15-474McDONNELL, ROBERT F. V. UNITED STATES
The motion of petitioner to deem the Court of Appeals joint appendix and supplemental appendix as the joint appendix in this Court is granted.
15-7091JOHNSON, BART W. V. ALABAMA
The respondent is requested to file a response to the petition for rehearing within 30 days.
15-7304RAUSO, GENNARO V. UNITED STATES
15-7406WILLIAMS, TERRANCE V. UNITED STATES
The motions of petitioners for reconsideration of orders denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied.
15-7431LIEBESKIND, MARC V. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, ET AL.
15-7602READE, WILLIAM F. V. GALVIN, WILLIAM F., ET AL.
15-7610JOHNSSON, MARGARET A. V. RITTMANIC, MARK B.
15-7645MUATHE, ERIC M. V. FIFTH THIRD BANK, ET AL.
15-7840HANSEN, KATHLEEN V. DEPT. OF ARMY
The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied. Petitioners are allowed until March 28, 2016, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
CERTIORARI DENIED
15-276KANSAS V. DULL, BRYCE M.
15-380SALEM FINANCIAL, INC. V. UNITED STATES
15-438ALLIANCE OF AUTO MANUFACTURERS V. CURREY, MELODY A., ET AL.
15-460ONE BEACON INS. CO., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
15-478AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP V. UNITED STATES
15-517LOPEZ, GILBERT V. UNITED STATES with
15-6608KUHRT, MARK V. UNITED STATES
15-551EASON, RICKY N. V. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES
15-563SHAMMAS, MILO V. HIRSHFELD, COMM'R FOR PATENTS
15-565APPLE, INC. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
15-572BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON V. CIR
15-715ADAR 980 REALTY V. SOFER, AVRAHAM, ET AL.
15-720BILL, DANIEL, ET AL. V. BREWER, WARREN, ET AL.
15-735BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY V. FAIR, DELTON R.
15-741KELLEY, DIR., AR DOC V. GORDON, ULONZO
15-841DIXON, CARL J. V. COLUMBIA ASSOCIATION, INC.
15-844EWING INDUSTRIES CORPORATION V. BOB WINES NURSERY, INC., ET AL.
15-845DAHMS, CHARLES V. ILLINOIS
15-852CLELAND, BRANDON, ET AL. V. BAYNES, ALAN
15-854PADULA--WILSON, AMANDA V. WILSON, MICHAEL G.
15-878CHINWEZE, INNOCENT O. V. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
15-883RUIZ-VIDAL, JOSE R. V. LYNCH, ATT'Y GEN.
15-890KENTUCKY V. ROUSE, ANTWAN D.
15-902NANIC, HAZRET, ET UX. V. LYNCH, ATT'Y GEN.
15-920WAHAB, CHASSIB K. V. ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES, INC.
15-943TOWLE, MARK V. DC COMICS
15-970BALDEO, ALBERT V. UNITED STATES
15-972DELACRUZ, DANIEL V. STATE BAR OF CA
15-5810CROWE, RAYNARD V. V. UNITED STATES with
15-5979WINGATE, ALFRED R. V. UNITED STATES
15-6479KELLY, ANDREAS J. V. SWARTHOUT, WARDEN
15-6520WILSON, GENERAL GRANT V. WISCONSIN
15-6568MALIK, MOHAMMED I. V. UNITED STATES
15-6691LITTLE, TERRY L. V. UNITED STATES
15-6768HODGES, CORTEZ T. V. UNITED STATES
15-7153SUTEERACHANON, RUNGRUDEE V. McDONALD'S RESTAURANTS OF MD
15-7222WONG, HONG LEE V. UNITED STATES
15-7554HARTLEY, KENNETH V. FLORIDA
15-7556HENDERSON, MICHAEL J. V. ARTUS, SUPT., ATTICA
15-7566DREIBELBIS, TERRY V. WENEROWICZ, SUPT., GRATERFORD
15-7569HARRIS, FRANK V. BITER, WARDEN
15-7574WHITT, JOHN A. V. SLEEPY HOLLOW GOLF CLUB, INC.
15-7577BRANTLEY, ANTIONE V. ILLINOIS
15-7578RUSS, ROY V. WITHROW, ROBERT
15-7585GILES, HERBERT V. HAAS, WARDEN
15-7587LAWSON, GEOFFREY L. V. CAMPBELL, WARDEN
15-7588JOHNSON, THOMAS V. CAMPBELL, WARDEN
15-7589LAMBERT, ANDREW J. V. MICHIGAN
15-7590LISENBY, BILLY L. V. COHEN, WARDEN
15-7592POTVIN, ANDREW F. V. POWERS, JERRY, ET AL.
15-7593OTYANG, VINCENT V. SAN FRANCISCO, CA, ET AL.
15-7595NELSON, SALUTA, ET AL. V. LOUISE, MAYOR, ET AL.
15-7596PITTS, RONALD D. V. QUILTER, J. BERNIE, ET AL.
15-7597GREEN, GERALD A. V. HILL, WARDEN
15-7598STRAND, MICHAEL V. NUPETCO ASSOCIATES, LLC
15-7605MUBITA, KANAY V. BLADES, WARDEN
15-7613SANCHEZ, RICARDO E. V. STEPHENS, DIR., TX DCJ
15-7616HOLLAND, JAMES V. RIVARD, WARDEN
15-7617GUERRERO, VICENTE V. ILLINOIS
15-7618HOLMES, MATTELLA V. STEPPIG MANAGEMENT
15-7619SPENCER, RANDY L. V. FLORIDA
15-7620CALDERON-LOPEZ, RICARDO J. V. GUMUSHYAN, TIGRAN, ET AL.
15-7621MIMS, KENNETH V. CAIN, WARDEN
15-7627WINFIELD, CAROLYN V. UNIV. OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER
15-7628VALENTINE-MORALES, JOED V. MOONEY, SUPT., COAL TOWNSHIP
15-7636LONG, RAYMOND O. V. QUALLS, WARDEN
15-7638LORDMASTER, FRANKIE J. V. EPPS, KEITH, ET AL.
15-7641AGUIRRE, HECTOR M. V. MONTGOMERY, WARDEN
15-7646SPENCER, RANDY V. OLIN, MELISSA, ET AL.
15-7648MAMMEN, ROBERT H. V. CHAPMAN, JUDGE, ETC.
15-7650SUERO, ROGEL I. V. PENNSYLVANIA
15-7651ROMERO, TRINITY J. V. COLORADO
15-7652JAMES, AARON T. V. PHILLIPS, WARDEN
15-7655TROGLIN, NELSON V. COOK, WARDEN
15-7657McDONALD, DONALD L. V. ILLINOIS
15-7658SACKS, AARON D. V. SHOPRITE SUPERMARKETS
15-7665BLAKE, PRESTON J. V. WRIGLEY, WARDEN, ET AL.
15-7711DIXON, GREGORY V. AYERS, WARDEN
15-7747NY, VISITH V. LIND, RANDY, ET AL.
15-7782WRIGHT, LORETTA V. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ET AL.
15-7785SZABO, KATALIN V. GOLDFARB, ALLAN
15-7791JAMES, FRIDAY V. UNITED STATES
15-7826BONEY, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES
15-7837BROWN, WILLIAM B. V. MANSUKHANI, WARDEN
15-7853SAINT-SURIN, ANTOINE F. V. UNITED STATES
15-7862COLLINS, BRIAN H. V. UNITED STATES
15-7864BARNETT, DENNIS R. V. FOX, WARDEN
15-7867BUTLER, JAMES V. USDC ED MI
15-7870KIEFER, MARK R. V. UNITED STATES
15-7873DANIELS, LAMIN L. V. UNITED STATES
15-7874CHAFIN, RICHARD A. V. UNITED STATES
15-7877SIMMONS, TODD V. UNITED STATES
15-7884SPENCER, JOHN A. V. UNITED STATES
15-7890WOODWARD, ELLO M. V. UNITED STATES
15-7895MAYNOR, RICHARD K. V. UNITED STATES
15-7898AVILA-CORREA, GEYEN V. UNITED STATES
15-7899ANDREWS, ALBERT L. V. UNITED STATES
15-7906NICHOLSON, DAMON D. V. UNITED STATES
15-7908TORRES GUZMAN, IRVIN A. V. UNITED STATES
15-7916BUMAGIN, SEMYON V. UNITED STATES
15-7917WARREN, FELIX V. UNITED STATES
15-7922DELGADO, LUIS A. V. UNITED STATES
15-7924NAUGHTON, JEREMY V. UNITED STATES
15-7925MYERS, LLOYD V. UNITED STATES
15-7930DUDLEY, JOEL V. UNITED STATES
15-7947FRANCES, ALBURY V. UNITED STATES
15-7951RONDON, RAFAEL V. UNITED STATES
15-7961JEAN-PIERRE, STEVEN V. UNITED STATES
15-7962MADSEN, LAWRENCE V. UNITED STATES
15-7963MARRERO, JUAN E. V. UNITED STATES
15-7966McDONALD, NICHOLAS V. UNITED STATES
15-7975CLAY, DONALD D. V. UNITED STATES
15-7976SILER, RICHARD A. V. UNITED STATES
15-7979SHOUMAN, MUJAHAD V. UNITED STATES
15-7983HARLEY, DAVID L. V. UNITED STATES
15-7986HARRELL, KENTON D. V. UNITED STATES
15-7990KENNEDY, KEVIN J. V. UNITED STATES
15-7992CHAPMAN, VERNON V. UNITED STATES
15-7996WOMACK, CHRISTIAN D. V. USDC ED PA
15-7997TASKOV, DRAGOMIR V. UNITED STATES
15-8011ARNOLD, JASON P. V. UNITED STATES
15-8016BARRERA-ESTRADA, GUSTAVO V. UNITED STATES
15-8021HEDRICK, ROBERT L. V. UNITED STATES
15-8035GUTIERREZ-JARAMILLO, JULIO C. V. UNITED STATES
15-8046RAGHUNATHAN, SRIKANTH, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
15-8053ACCITUNO, MARIO L. V. UNITED STATES
15-8064MEDINA, BRANDON L. V. UNITED STATES
15-8070RAMOS, BALBINO V. UNITED STATES
15-8072BROXON, DUSTI N. V. UNITED STATES
15-8073TIPPINS, DEONDRAI A. V. UNITED STATES
15-8075PEREZ, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES
15-8115DAVIS, DARLENE J. V. COMCAST CORP., INC., ET AL.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
14-639NEW HAMPSHIRE V. SOTO, MICHAEL, ET AL.
The motion of respondents Robert Dingman and Eduardo Lopez, Jr., for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
14-1472CONNECTICUT V. RILEY, ACKEEM
The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
15-238SEMPLE, COMM'R, CT DOC V. CASIANO, JASON
The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in form pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
15-870FLORIDA V. GRIDINE, SHIMEEK D.
The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
15-5798SCHWAGER, JOSHUA V. SCHWAGER, CHANA A.
The motion of petitioner to defer consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
15-7571HAMILTON, JAN B. V. BIRD, DON, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment is denied.
15-7612LeBLANC, JEFFREY R. V. CORPORATE MARATHON
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
15-7615FOSTER, JOHN M. V. WILLIAMS, WARDEN
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,
506 U. S. 1 (1992)
(per curiam).
15-7631WEBB, DAVID V. USDC UT
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
15-8054BLANCO, RAMON V. UNITED STATES
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
15-8155IN RE GREGORY JAMES SHIVER
15-8182IN RE RODOLFO ORTIZ
15-8193IN RE CHARLES R. GETZ
15-8198IN RE SHAWN KEVIN SMAAGE
The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.
15-8143IN RE ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,
506 U. S. 1 (1992)
(per curiam).
MANDAMUS DENIED
15-7517IN RE JIMMIE WHITE, II
15-7659IN RE KEVIN D. RAY
15-7843IN RE ANTHONY L. VIOLA
15-7956IN RE ROBERT L. HEDRICK
The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
15-7591IN RE JACK R. KOCH
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals,
506 U. S. 1 (1992)
(per curiam).
PROHIBITION DENIED
15-8052IN RE PATRICK BOYD
The petition for a writ of prohibition is denied.
REHEARINGS DENIED
15-593TESLER, MICHAEL V. CACACE, SUSAN, ET AL.
15-633DUFF, TYRONE, ET UX. V. LEWIS, RICHARD W., ET AL.
15-663KRATZ, JEFFREY F. V. CITIMORTGAGE INC.
15-691ARUNACHALAM, LAKSHMI V. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
15-6075FLETCHER, TIMOTHY W. V. FLORIDA
15-6211WHITE, JOSEPH V. DETROIT EAST COMM. MENTAL HEALTH
15-6633BARNETT, THERESA V. CROCKETT, DAVID S., ET AL.
15-6696HOSKINS, WALTER V. FAYRAM, WARDEN
15-6718RODRIGUEZ, DEAN C. V. BEARD, SEC. CA DOC
15-6787RASHID, AMIN A. V. ORTIZ, WARDEN
15-6876L. B. V. S. T., ET AL.
15-7104LEVITAN, DANIEL J. V. MORGAN, SHERIFF
15-7235ADAMS, MARVIN L. V. UNITED STATES
The petitions for rehearing are denied.
15-5579FLORES-PEREZ, CIRILO V. UNITED STATES
The petition for rehearing is denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE
D-2837 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN H. WYMAN
John H. Wyman, of Plymouth, Massachusetts, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that John H. Wyman is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2838 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DANIEL A. BECK
Daniel A. Beck, of Saluda, North Carolina, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that Daniel A. Beck is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2839 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARK H. ALLENBAUGH
Mark H. Allenbaugh, of Conneaut, Ohio, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that Mark H. Allenbaugh is disbarred from the
practice of law in this Court.
D-2840 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CHARLES JEFFREY BROIDA
Charles Jeffrey Broida, of Ellicott City, Maryland, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that Charles Jeffrey Broida is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2841 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LAURENCE M. STARR
Laurence M. Starr, of West Roxbury, Massachusetts, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that Laurence M. Starr is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2842 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DOUGLAS FREDERICK TRACIA
Douglas Frederick Tracia, of Wakefield, Massachusetts, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that Douglas Frederick Tracia is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2843 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RICHARD S. HANLON
Richard S. Hanlon, of Bayonne, New Jersey, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that Richard S. Hanlon is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2844 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JENNY R. ARMSTRONG
Jenny R. Armstrong, of Madison, Wisconsin, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that Jenny R. Armstrong is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2845 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PATRICIA JAMIE DORAN
Patricia Jamie Doran, of San Francisco, California, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued her requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that Patricia Jamie Doran is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2846 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF KEVIN PURCELL
Kevin Purcell, of Rocky River, Ohio, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that Kevin Purcell is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2847 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PAUL STEPHEN KORMANIK
Paul Stephen Kormanik, of Columbus, Ohio, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that Paul Stephen Kormanik is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2849 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT LANGSTON WILLIAMS
Robert Langston Williams, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that Robert Langston Williams is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2850 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PETER FLOYD ANDERSON, JR.
Peter Floyd Anderson, Jr., of Garnerville, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that Peter Floyd Anderson, Jr. is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2853 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES MARSHALL BIDDLE
James Marshall Biddle, of Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that James Marshall Biddle is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2855 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DANIEL JAMES HALLORAN, III
Daniel James Halloran, III, of Flushing, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that Daniel James Halloran, III is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2856 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DEAN GARY WEBER
Dean Gary Weber, of Hauppauge, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of November 2, 2015; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired;
It is ordered that Dean Gary Weber is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.