From the Legal Information Institute and Project Hermes
[Other parts of the opinion, WordPerfect versions, and related documents]
ORDER LIST
MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1992 APPEALS SUMMARY DISPOSITION
90-1977 DUPREE, JOHNNY, ET AL. V. MOORE, ATTY. GEN. OF MISSISSIPPI
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi for further consideration in light of Clark v. Roemer, 500 U.S. ____ (1991). 91-1210 CLINTON, GOV. OF ARKANSAS V. JEFFERS, M.C., ET AL.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas with instructions to enter a fresh judgment from which an appeal may be taken to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
CERTIORARI SUMMARY DISPOSITION
90-1164 SMITH, WILLIE V. BLACK, COMMR., MISSISSIPPI DOC
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Stringer v. Black, 503 U.S. ____ (1992). 91-432 MOORE, RANDOLPH V. NEVADA
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Nevada for further consideration in light of Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. ____ (1992). 91-701 ILLINOIS V. KELK, JOHN P.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District, for further consideration in light of Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. ____ (1991). Justice Stevens dissents. 91-885 EASLEY, STEVEN L. V. SOUTHERN SHIPBUILDING CORP.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Southwest Marine, Inc. v. Gizoni, 502 U.S. ____ (1991). 91-5293 FLANAGAN, DALE E. V. NEVADA
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Nevada for further consideration in light of Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. ____ (1992). 91-5787 PROWS, DARRELL V. UNITED STATES
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of McCarthy v. Madigan, 503 U.S. ____ (1992). 91-6700 KOCHEKIAN, KENNETH M. V. UNITED STATES
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of Williams v. United States, 503 U.S. ____ (1992). 91-7135 JEFFERIES, JEFFREY V. SOUTH CAROLINA
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of South Carolina for further consideration in light of Yates v. Evatt, 500 U.S. ____ (1991).
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
No. MATTHEW J. TRAVERS, JR., ET AL. V. BULLIS SCHOOL, INC. The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for a writ of certiorari, out of time, is denied. D-1066 IN THE MATTER OF JAMES JOHN KROS
James John Kros, of Aurora, Illinois, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, heretofore issued on January 13, 1992, is hereby discharged. D-1068 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DONNIE HOWARD WHITE
It having been reported to the Court that Donnie Howard White, of Georgetown, Kentucky, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Kentucky and this Court by order of January 13, 1992, having suspended the said Donnie Howard White from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Donnie Howard White be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1069 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID BAKER
It having been reported to the Court that David Baker, of Avalon, New Jersey, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of New Jersey and this Court by order of January 13, 1992, having suspended the said David Baker from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said David Baker be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1074 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES F. CLEMENTS
It having been reported to the Court that James F. Clements, of Landover, Maryland, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Court of Appeals of Maryland and this Court by order of January 21, 1992, having suspended the said James F. Clements from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said James F. Clements be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1075 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EDWARD E. PACK
It having been reported to the Court that Edward E. Pack, of Livingston, New Jersey, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of New Jersey and this Court by order of January 21, 1992, having suspended the said Edward E. Pack from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Edward E. Pack be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1076 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN HERBERT RATLIFF
It having been reported to the Court that John Herbert Ratliff, of Somerville, New Jersey, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of New Jersey and this Court by order of January 21, 1992, having suspended the said John Herbert Ratliff from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said John Herbert Ratliff be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. D-1094 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HANS CHARLES OTTO FEIGE
It is ordered that Hans Charles Otto Feige, of Coral Springs, Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1095 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ADRIAN F. O'BRYAN
It is ordered that Adrian F. O'Bryan, of Louisville, Kentucky, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1096 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MAX CARLETON GARRICK, JR.
It is ordered that Max Carleton Garrick, Jr., of Whittier, California, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1097 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BRUCE ALAN FRIEDMAN
It is ordered that Bruce Alan Friedman, of Los Angeles, California, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1098 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL THOMAS KENNEY
It is ordered that Michael Thomas Kenney, of Santa Ana, California, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. 90-1258 GOMEZ, WARDEN V. McKINNEY, MICHAEL
The motion of respondent to retax costs is granted. 90-1918 KRAFT GENERAL FOODS, INC. V. IOWA DEPT. OF REV. & FINANCE
The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted. 90-8370 MEDINA, TEOFILO V. CALIFORNIA
The motion of petitioner for leave to file a supplemental brief after argument is denied. 91-155 ) INT. SOC. FOR KRISHNA, ET AL. V. LEE, WALTER
) 91-339 ) LEE, WALTER V. INTL. SOC. FOR KRISHNA, ET AL.
The motion of petitioners /cross respondents to strike amicus curiae brief of Airports Association Council International North America is denied.
91 538 FORSYTH CTY., GEORGIA V. NATIONALIST MOVEMENT The motion of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Public Citizen for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.
91-542 WRIGHT, WARDEN, ET AL. V. WEST, FRANK
The motion of Benjamin R. Civiletti, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Gerald Gunther, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. 91-744 ) PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SE PA V. CASEY, ROBERT, ET AL.
)
91-902 ) CASEY, ROBERT, ET AL. V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SE PA
The motion of Alan Ernest to represent children unborn and born alive is denied. The motion of Legal Defense for Unborn Children for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is denied. 91-790 ) CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. V. EASTERWOOD, LIZZIE
) 91-1206 ) EASTERWOOD, LIZZIE V. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
91-1111 ) HARTFORD FIRE INS., ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
)
91-1128 ) MERRETT UNDERWRITING, ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
)
91-1131 ) WINTHERTHUR REINSURANCE V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
) 91-1146 ) UNIONAMERICA INS., ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in these cases expressing the views of the United States.
91-849 ) BD. OF ED. SCHOOL DIST. 21 V. ILLINOIS ST. BD. OF ED.
)
91-865 ) ILLINOIS ST. BD. OF ED. V. BD. OF ED. SCHOOL DIST. 21
The motion of respondents Brozer, et ux. for assessment of attorney's fees and costs is denied. 91-913 PATTERSON, JOHN V. SHUMATE, JOSEPH
The motion of David B. Tatge, Trustee, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. 91-946 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
91-1188 ROWLAND, JAMES, ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA MEN'S COLONY
The motions of petitioners to dispense with printing the joint appendix are granted. 91-6109 GILBERTSON, E.N. V. GRAHAM, ROBERT, ET AL.
The motion of respondent Walker for attorneys' fees is denied. 91-6194 CROSBY, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES
The motion for appointment of counsel is granted and it is ordered that Mark D. Nyvold, Esquire, of St. Paul, Minnesota, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case. 91-7064 TOLIVER, TOMMIE V. CTY. OF SULLIVAN, ET AL.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 13, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens, dissenting: For the reasons expresed in Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., 464 U.S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
CERTIORARI GRANTED
91-871 BATH IRON WORKS CORP., ET AL. V. DIR., OFFICE OF WCP, ETC.
91-948 CHURCH OF LUKUMI, ET AL. V. CITY OF HIALEAH
91-998 CIR V. SOLIMAN, NADER E.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. 91-1158 MISSISSIPPI, ET AL. V. LOUISIANA, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition and to the following question: Did the district court properly assert jurisdiction over respondent's third party compliant against petitioner State of Mississippi? 91-6824 ZAFIRO, GLORIA, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
The motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.
CERTIORARI DENIED
91-851 MEDLEY, ROSEMARY M. V. UNITED STATES
91-929 KIMES, SANTE V. UNITED STATES
91-942 RICHARDSON, KENNETH V. UNITED STATES
91-944 COOPER ELECTRIC SUPPLY V. MARTIN, SEC. OF LABOR
91-969 ALLEN, MICHAEL H. V. UNITED STATES
91-982 EMPLOYEES OF BUTTE RAILWAY V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
91-991 GRIFFEY, ALLEN V. UNITED STATES
91-1006 U.S. MARINE CORP., ET AL. V. NLRB, ET AL.
91-1007 CAINE, CURTIS V. HARDY, M. D., ET AL.
91-1026 E. ALABAMA HEALTH CARE V. AUBURN MEDICAL CENTER, INC.
91-1036 JONES, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
91-1041 TAITAGUE, GREGORIO, ET AL. V. FIRST ISLAND INDUS., ET AL.
91-1062 SCHATZ, IVAN, ET UX. V. WEINBERG AND GREEN
91-1068 EDWARDS, LARRY, ET AL. V. U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
91-1139 FRANKLIN SAVINGS, ET AL. V. DIR., OFFICE OF THRIFT SUP.
91-1175 MORGAN, DAVID V. COMMUNITY REDEV. AGENCY
91-1178 BASHAM, DeWAYNE W. V. BLANKENSHIP, L. A., ETC.
91-1184 ERICKSON, RUSSELL, ET AL. V. DESERT PALACE, ET AL.
91-1191 HECKER, RICHARD V. FRANKLIN NATL. BANK
91-1194 COMM. OF UNSECURED CREDITORS V. MELLON BANK, ET AL.
91-1201 SHUTT, VINCENT V. SANDOZ CROP PROTECT., ET AL.
91-1204 ROBINSON, NOAH V. SOUTH CAROLINA
91-1205 LAVERGNE, CATHY V. CAMERON IRON WORKS
91-1207 FRONT ROYAL INDUST. PARK V. FRONT ROYAL, VIRGINIA
91-1212 MITCHELL, PORTER V. MOBIL OIL CORP., ET AL.
91-1214 BROOKS, SIDNEY V. SULPHUR SPRINGS VALLEY ELEC.
91-1219 CULLY, MARIE E. V. COTOFAN, ELI
91-1222 CALIFORNIA ELEC. CO. V. BRILEY, PATRICK, ET AL.
91-1224 OUZTS, PATRICIA V. SOUTH CAROLINA
91-1226 DAVIS, J. O., ET AL. V. HOLLIS, O. P.
91-1228 CSOKA, LOUIS V. WALDEN, WILLIAM, ET AL.
91-1230 HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. V. MORRIS, JUDGE, ETC.
91-1232 NORMAN, CYNTHIA, ETC. V. VEPCO
91-1235 NAVARRO, SHERIFF V. REVIEW PUBLICATIONS, INC.
91-1237 HAMILTON, ROBERT V. AIR JAMAICA, LTD.
91-1238 ) PATY, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. PRICE, NUI LOA, ET AL.
) 91-1273 ) PRICE, NUI LOA, ET AL. V. HAWAII
91-1244 HYPOINT TECH. V. HEWLETT PACKARD CO.
91-1246 ARLEN, BILLY V. UNITED STATES
91-1247 MARX, DENNIS P. V. UNITED STATES
91-1249 NOWERS, WILLIAM V. VIRGINIA
91-1250 McALLAN, RICHARD J. V. KERR, JAMES, ET AL.
91-1253 COOK, DONALD V. CAIN, CLARENCE
91-1256 KLAVONICK, CHARLES V. IRONWORKERS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
91-1258 BOYD, JAMES, ET UX. V. FORD MOTOR CO., ET AL.
91-1261 TEXAS V. WALKER, DANIEL
91-1262 BOWERS, RICHARD, ET AL. V. PERKO, JAMES
91-1264 SOEHNGEN, RICHARD V. MERIT SYSTEM PROTECT. BD.
91-1277 FARSACI, STEVEN, ETC. V. BUSH, PRES. OF THE U.S.
91-1279 KULZER, PAULINE, ETC. V. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS
91-1287 IRBY, KEITH, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES
91-1294 PARKER, RUTH A. V. NEW JERSEY
91-1297 OHIO DEPT. OF HUMAN SERV. V. OHIO HOSP. ASSN., ET AL.
91-1307 RANGEL, FERNANDO V. UNITED STATES
91-1318 METALLO, WILLIAM V. UNITED STATES
91-1336 REICHLIN, LEONARD V. WILLIAMS, NOVACK, ET AL.
91-1338 GIRLING HEALTH SYSTEMS V. UNITED STATES
91-1343 GOOS, KARL F. V. CIR
91-1357 PERALTA, ROLANDO V. UNITED STATES
91-1364 HASSNEH INS. CO. OF ISRAEL V. SUPER. CT. OF CALIFORNIA
91-5006 J.E.B. V. WISCONSIN
91-6461 CUNNINGHAM, BENNIE V. PETERS, DIR., ILLINOIS DOC
91-6490 HESTER, NATALIE R. V. UNITED STATES
91-6510 YOUNG, JERRY V. HERRING, ROBERT, ET AL.
91-6611 PURVIS, JOHN G. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FLORIDA DOC
91-6633 WILLIAMS, BRUCE V. OPM
91-6661 GIBSON, STEVEN V. UNITED STATES
91-6666 MOSCO, ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES
91-6676 ZAVESKY, DAVID A. V. SCHERERVILLE, INDIANA
91-6693 FISHER, MANSON V. ALABAMA
91-6722 KELLY, KEVIN V. UNITED STATES
91-6726 PARMASAVAM, CHELIA V. UNITED STATES
91-6742 WILLIAMS, ERIC D. V. UNITED STATES
91-6774 BARNETT, GARY W. V. UNITED STATES
91-6805 BODRE, INGRID J. V. UNITED STATES
91-6806 SWAN, LARRY, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES
91-6811 DUNNICK, ERIC B. V. UNITED STATES
91-6814 FRAZIER, WAYNE V. OHIO
91-6817 DONOVAN, ANTONIO, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
91-6825 DUNSON, ROBERT, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
91-6833 NAVARRO BOTELLO, JOSE V. UNITED STATES
91-6839 OGUNLEYE, ADEMOLA M. V. INS
91-6850 EDDMONDS, DURLYN V. ILLINOIS
91-6853 CRUZ, RAMIRO V. UNITED STATES
91-6869 ESCOLASTICO DISLA, LUIS V. UNITED STATES
91-6886 ABATE, TESHOME V. HUD, ET AL.
91-6891 BEVILL, RANDY V. MISSISSIPPI
91-6910 SOSA, JOSE V. UNITED STATES
91-6953 COHEN, ERNEST V. SOUTH CAROLINA
91-6965 PINKSTON, LEON D. V. UNITED STATES
91-6992 PEREZ, MAURICE C. V. UNITED STATES
91-6995 ALLEN, JOHN B. V. UNITED STATES
91-7007 KHAN, ABDUL Q. V. TANNER, J., ET AL.
91-7017 FRALEY, DENNIS O. V. UNITED STATES
91-7037 JONES, EARL P. V. CALIFORNIA
91-7053 WHITLOCK, HERBERT V. O'LEARY, ASST DEPUTY, ET AL.
91-7056 BATTENFIELD, BILLY R. V. OKLAHOMA
91-7058 CUNNINGHAM, JERALD C. V. WOODMAN, M., ET AL.
91-7060 CLARKE, JEROME V. CLARKE CTY., GEORGIA, ET AL.
91-7062 SALIM, JABARI V. MURRAY, DIR., VIRGINIA DOC
91-7063 N.S. V. EL PASO CTY., COLORADO
91-7065 HARRIS, JAMES C. V. OKLAHOMA
91-7066 HOLMAN, RICHARD V. O'LEARY, WARDEN
91-7070 GONZALEZ CALAS, JUAN C. V. UNITED STATES
91-7071 DILL, EDWIN V. LOVE, SUPT.
91-7074 BOUDETTE, GREGORY W., ET AL. V. CTY. OF YAVAPAI, ET AL.
91-7075 RUIZ, GUSTAVO D. V. UNITED STATES
91-7079 RITCHERSON, MARY C. V. UNITED STATES
91-7083 MOORE, RUSSELL V. FLORIDA
91-7089 FRANZEN, BRUCE L. V. WRIGHT, ROBIN A., ET AL.
91-7098 SULLY, ANTHONY J. V. CALIFORNIA
91-7101 MONTGOMERY, JERRY V. UNIV. OF CHICAGO, ET AL.
91-7102 THOMASON, CHARLES V. U. S. STEEL, ET AL.
91-7104 MOISTER, ROGER W. V. FIRST NATL. BK. OF ATLANTA
91-7111 SMITH, WILLIE V. LYNAUGH, JAMES, ET AL.
91-7115 HARDING, JAMES V. REDMAN, WARDEN
91-7118 BACCHUS, CAMERON D. V. POSTMAN, ALAN L.
91-7120 SCOTT, JOHN V. TEXAS
91-7123 SIMMONS, VERNON V. BEYER, SUPT., ET AL.
91-7130 STARKS, RONALD V. McMACKIN, WARDEN
91-7132 IDZIAK, STANLEY H. V. MICHIGAN
91-7133 HENRY, CLIFFORD E. V. COLLINS, DIR., TEXAS DCJ
91-7134 HOWARD, FORD V. ZIMMERMAN, CHARLES, ET AL.
91-7136 IN RE JAMES M. JESSE
91-7138 LUCIEN, RUDOLPH L. V. PETERS, WARDEN
91-7139 LUCIEN, RUDOLPH L. V. JOHNSON, COMMR., ETC.
91-7140 LUCIEN, RUDOLPH L. V. ROPER, CHARLES, ET AL.
91-7141 REININGHAUS, HAROLD E. V. REININGHAUS, SHERYL A.
91-7145 GALBRAITH, SHERRY E. V. NORTHERN TELECOM, INC.
91-7147 YIM, CHUNG K. V. PRELESNIK, WARDEN
91-7149 FRANCOIS, BUCLAN V. DUGGER, SEC., FLORIDA DOC
91-7150 HUNTER, CHARLIE V. ROBERTS, K. B., ET AL.
91-7153 RITCHERSON, DAVID H. V. UNITED STATES
91-7154 MENDEZ, MANUEL V. UNITED STATES
91-7156 PETILLO, JOSEPH V. McCLELLAN, SUPT.
91-7157 OWENS, MICHAEL W. V. MURRAY, DIR., VIRGINIA DOC
91-7158 ZIMMERMAN, STACEY V. PENNSYLVANIA
91-7160 ATEN, BONNIE, ETC. V. NEUBERT, CALVIN, ET AL.
91-7162 PARZIALE, DAVID M. V. UNITED STATES
91-7163 ROLLINS, GARY V. TENNESSEE
91-7164 REINBOLD, WILFRED V. DEWEY COUNTY BANK
91-7165 MARIN, MEL M. V. BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
91-7166 LOVINGS, PAUL A. V. VIRGINIA
91-7171 JUSTICE, EUNICE V. LTV STEEL CO., INC., ET AL.
91-7172 HUFFSMITH, DON V. WYOMING CTY, PRISON BD.
91-7177 SIRECI, HENRY V. FLORIDA
91-7178 YEATTS, RONALD D. V. VIRGINIA
91-7183 FERGUSON, KELVIN D. V. UNITED STATES
91-7204 HARRIS, RICHARD R. V. SIVLEY, WARDEN
91-7207 CONNER, KEVIN V. INDIANA
91-7210 WAGGONER, DAVID V. COLLINS, DIR., TEXAS DCJ
91-7212 LOWE, JON M. V. UNITED STATES
91-7213 HARDY, CHESTER V. LeCUREUX, WARDEN
91-7220 MILLER, WILLIAM C. V. UNITED STATES
91-7221 PHILLIPE, CARLY J. V. UNITED STATES
91-7225 RUGGLES, CHARLES F. V. CITY OF RIVERSIDE
91-7226 ALBURY, FREDERICK W., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
91-7230 BATTS, DONALD V. UNITED STATES
91-7235 MINOTA GUERRERO, ANGELICO V. UNITED STATES
91-7237 McFADDEN, CRAWLEY D. V. DERWINSKI, SEC. OF VET. AFFAIRS
91-7238 WARD, CHERYL V. WARD, MARTIN R.
91-7241 KENNEDY, JIM L. V. UNITED STATES
91-7254 ANDREWS, TOMMIE L. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FLORIDA DOC
91-7259 FAIRMAN, CURTIS C. V. UNITED STATES
91-7261 GOMEZ, CONRADO J. V. UNITED STATES
91-7265 DIAZ, FABIO V. TERRELL, TAMMIE B., ET AL.
91-7266 ROGERS, PAUL V. UNITED STATES
91-7267 PELAEZ CARMONA, CARLOS V. UNITED STATES
91-7268 MORENO, BAYRON V. UNITED STATES
91-7281 LAWSON, DAVID D. V. UNITED STATES
91-7284 HARRISON, DOLDRIDGE V. UNITED STATES
91-7289 CANO, MIGUEL V. UNITED STATES
91-7290 STRAUGHTER, CHARLES V. UNITED STATES
91-7291 HERNANDEZ, TOMA R. V. UNITED STATES
91-7296 HARPER, KAREN S. V. UNITED STATES
91-7297 WILLIAMS, GENE E. V. UNITED STATES
91-7303 SAMUELS, REGINALD V. HAWLEY, WARDEN
91-7305 ) PINK, ISRAEL V. UNITED STATES
) 91-7349 ) RODNEY, SANDRA W. V. UNITED STATES
91-7306 OSEGUERA LUCATERO, ANTONIO V. UNITED STATES
91-7307 POOLE, EDWARD O. V. UNITED STATES
91-7310 ARACHE, FRANK V. UNITED STATES
91-7318 MALONE, MARTINEZ V. UNITED STATES
91-7319 STEWART, CECIL V. UNITED STATES
91-7321 ZEPEDA, DANIEL V. DORSEY, DONALD, ET AL.
91-7322 CRUM, EDWARD L. V. UNITED STATES
91-7324 THOMPSON, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES
91-7329 MATA, JUAN A. V. UNITED STATES
91-7330 OAKLEY, ROBERT W. V. UNITED STATES
91-7331 MURACCIOLE, ROQUE A. V. UNITED STATES
91-7334 GRUNDEN, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES
91-7338 FOWLER, DONNIE D. V. UNITED STATES
91-7341 SKILLERN, STEVEN R. V. UNITED STATES
91-7346 MOORE, NATHANIEL V. DPTY. COMMR., ST. CORR. INS.
91-7353 GILES, ERIC V. UNITED STATES
91-7357 ROARK, BENJAMIN A. V. UNITED STATES
91-7359 SMYLIE, STEVE V. UNITED STATES
91-7361 BAUMAN, HIRAM L. V. UNITED STATES
91-7362 VACCARO, DWIGHT C. V. UNITED STATES
91-7364 ABADIA, LUCELLY V. UNITED STATES
91-7368 GILBERT, CLEM R. V. UNITED STATES
91-7369 JOHNSON, ROLAND V. UNITED STATES
91-7372 WILLIAMS, ORTHNELL D. V. UNITED STATES
91-7373 MINICONE, JACK J. V. UNITED STATES
91-7374 MAYA, JAIME V. UNITED STATES
91-7382 ABREGO, MIGUEL A. V. UNITED STATES
91-7393 DOE, JANE V. GROSS, MONA ET AL.
91-7396 GREENE, ALONZO V. SENKOWSKI, SUPT., ET AL
91-7418 SAVAGE, JOHN V. UNITED STATES
91-7422 JOZWIAK, JEROME, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
90-1861 GREENVILLE PUB. SCH., ET AL. V. WESTERN LINE DIST., ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari. 91-977 ) DIST. 6, INTL. UNION V. NLRB
) 91-1025 ) HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ASSN. V. NLRB, ET AL.
91-1040 PENTHOUSE INTL. V. MEESE, EDWIN, ET AL.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions. 91-996 CALIFORNIA V. CRIBAS, CESAR E.
The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without an affidavit of indigency executed by respondent is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 91-1002 ) YOUNG & RUBICAN, INC. V. MIDLER, BETTE
) 91-1199 ) MIDLER, BETTE V. YOUNG & RUBICAN, INC.
The motion of American Association of Advertising Agencies, Inc. for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in No. 91-1002 is granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. 91-1009 SCHOWENGERDT, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
91-1159 MOURADIAN, RAYMOND V. JOHN HANCOCK COMPANIES
The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed as a veteran are granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. 91-1196 HEGGY, T. L. V. HEGGY, CATHERINE A.
91-1331 PIPEFITTERS' ASSN., #597 V. DANIELS, FRANK
91-6681 SMITH, JERRY D. V. UNITED STATES
91-6685 CALDERON, ELADIO A. V. UNITED STATES
91-6830 BARRETT, FRED MARLIN V. UNITED STATES
91-6849 FRIERSON, JEROME V. UNITED STATES
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice White would grant certiorari. 91-1216 SUTHERLAND, JAMES V. SUTHERLAND, BRONTE
The motion of Institute in Basic Life Principles, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of Lincoln Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. 91-1236 ABRAHAM, DIST. ATTY. OF PHILADELPHIA V. HARRIS, MARTIN
The motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice White would grant certiorari. 91-1240 ENGELKE, DANIEL V. SCHER, GREGORY
91-1280 ZANT, WARDEN V. HORTON, JIMMY L.
The motions of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. 91-7239 MOUNT, CHARLES M. V. UNITED STATES
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
91-7451 IN RE TYRONE LEE
The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.
MANDAMUS DENIED
91-7084 IN RE RACHEL C. MARTIN
91-7085 IN RE ROBERT S. MEADE
91-7256 IN RE CHARLES COX
91-7428 IN RE ORVILLE JOHNS
The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
REHEARINGS DENIED
91-899 SLOAN, LORIN V. UNITED STATES
91-5477 BROWN, LONNIE J. V. UNITED STATES
91-5613 WADE, JOHNNY L. V. GEORGIA
91-6199 KENNEDY, EDWARD D. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FLORIDA DOC, ET AL.
91-6225 AHMED, ABUL A.M. V. STONE, SEC., DEPT. OF ARMY
91-6334 CHALK, OCANIA V. HARRISON, ROBERT, ET AL.
91-6469 SMYTHE, STEWART V. GREEN, S. ARCHER, ET AL.
91-6474 STONE, WILLIAM V. DALLMAN, WARDEN
91-6514 WHITE, LEROY V. ALABAMA
91-6523 LOMBARD, JOHN F. V. NEW YORK CITY BD. OF ED.
91-6563 BRYMER, RICHARD E. V. HESSON, WARDEN, ET AL.
91-6649 GREENE, HERBERT V. TELEDYNE ELECTRONICS
The petitions for rehearing are denied. 91-5694 FERGUSON, JOHN V. GIANT FOODS, INC.
The petition for rehearing is denied. Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION
The written motions for admission of the following lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:
This archive is a service of the Legal Information Institute.