MONDAY, MARCH 29, 1999

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

97-1943 SUTTON, KAREN, ET AL. V. UNITED AIR LINES, INC.
97-1992 MURPHY, VAUGHN V. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
98-536 OLMSTEAD, COMMR., GA HUMAN vs. L. C., ETC. ET AL.

The motions of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument are granted.

98-405 RENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL V. BOSSIER PARISH SCH. BD. with
98-406 PRICE, GEORGE, ET AL. V. BOSSIER PARISH SCH. BD.
The motion of the Solicitor General for divided

argument is granted.

98-830 AMOCO PROD. CO. V. SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE

The motion of Wyoming for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for additional time for oral argument is denied without prejudice to file a motion to divide time with petitioners. The motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument is granted. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

98-7264 COERS, DAVID H. V. TX GUARANTEED STUDENT LOAN

The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.

98-7814 LOWE, RONALD D. V. POGUE, MARCUS, ET AL.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until April 19, 1999, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

98-8007 RAMIREZ, DANIEL A. V. UNITED STATES

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 19, 1999, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

98-8150 SCHWARZ, BARBARA V. FBI

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until April 19, 1999, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

CERTIORARI GRANTED

98-942 FIORE, WILLIAM V. WHITE, WARDEN, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition.

98-1189 BD. OF REGENTS, UNIV. OF WI V. SOUTHWORTH, SCOTT, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to the following question: Whether the First Amendment is offended by a policy or program under which public university students must pay mandatory fees that are used in part to support organizations that engage in political speech.

CERTIORARI DENIED

97-1356 AITKIN COUNTY, MN, ET AL. V. MILLE LACS BAND, ETC., ET AL
98-579 CACHE VALLEY ELECTRIC CO. vs. UT DEPT. OF TRANSP., ET AL.
98-1061 CASE, WILLIE V. KINSEY, OTIS, ET AL.
98-1124 KABIR, MONEM, ET AL. V. BACKSTROM & NEAL, ET AL.
98-1130 DALLAS FIRE FIGHTERS ASSN. V. DALLAS, TX, ET AL.
98-1159 HUFFMAN, GERALD, ET AL. V. LOS ANGELES, CA, ET AL.
98-1173 ATLANTA, GA vs. R. MAYER OF ATLANTA, INC.
98-1181 MARY HITCHCOCK MEM. HOSP. V. KLONOSKI, RICHARD
98-1191 PENRY, MICHELLE, ET AL. V. FED. HOME LOAN BANK, ET AL.
98-1193 SNYDER, TOM V. MURRAY CITY CORP., ET AL.
98-1198 COX, DANIEL V. UT LABOR COMMN., ET AL.
98-1210 GUARINO, DALE V. KAISER ALUM. & CHEM. CORP.
98-1216 CENTURY MARINE, INC. V. UNITED STATES
98-1217 FIREMAN'S FUND INS. V. TARKINGTON, O'CONNOR, ET AL.
98-1238 BERG, JEROME V. NEWSOM, BRENNAN, ET AL.
98-1247 SANDERS, DANIEL V. BLATNICK, WILLIAM
98-1251 CARTER, WYTISHA V. ALLEN, SAM
98-1262 LOMBARD CORPORATION V. COLLINS, MARCUS, ETC., ET AL
98-1292 FOREST COMMODITIES CORP. V. CONSTR. AGGREGATES, LTD.
98-1296 BERNARDO, JOANNE V. APFEL, COMMR. OF SOC. SEC.
98-1302 HEIDISCH, ROBERT V. FORD MOTOR CO.
98-1318 LEHMAN, JUDY, ET VIR V. UNITED STATES
98-1344 UNIROYAL GOODRICH TIRE CO. V. MARTINEZ, ROBERTO, ET UX.
98-1355 MOCZYGEMBA, GERVASE, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
98-1363 WILL & GRUNDY BLDG., ET AL. V. BE&K CONSTRUCTION CO.
98-1371 MEDEROS, OSWALDO, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
98-1374 HOUGH, WILLIAM, ET UX. vs. CIR
98-1376 TACKETT, BRIAN G. V. UNITED STATES
98-1378 COE, JOHN V. COOK CTY., IL
98-1384 STANFA, JOHN V. UNITED STATES
98-1385 OKOLI, GORDON NDUBISI V. UNITED STATES
98-1390 LEVY-CORDERO, VICTOR V. UNITED STATES
98-7046 PRYOR, ALISHIA T. V. UNITED STATES
98-7280 WISEHART, MARK A. V. INDIANA
98-7372 SILVA, MARCELINO C. V. KNOX, ROBERT
98-7391 WOODWARD, PAUL E. V. MISSISSIPPI
98-7398 DOE, JANE (R. S. W.) vs. UNITED STATES
98-7468 CAFFEY, ROSALYN V. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
98-7508 CRUMMIE, CHEDRICK V. UNITED STATES
98-7532 CLINE, LISA V. NEW MEXICO
98-7607 LEISURE, DAVID V. BOWERSOX, SUPT., POTOSI
98-7773 RAVER, LARRY D. V. McANINCH, WARDEN
98-7776 MORRIS, TIMOTHY E. V. GEORGIA
98-7779 LAGO, MIGUEL C. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC
98-7781 LANG, DEL D. V. BOONE, WARDEN, ET AL.
98-7786 KEMPER, WINSTON V. PLILER, WARDEN
98-7812 JACKSON, TERRY L. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ
98-7813 MYERS, JOHN V. PRUNTY, WARDEN, ET AL.
98-7815 KIM, JOHN V. LICALSI, ERNEST, ET AL.
98-7818 WHITAKER, THOMAS E. V. ALABAMA
98-7820 JOHNSON, RICHARD V. MOORE, DIR., SC DOC, ET AL.
98-7822 MITCHELL, RAYMOND J. V. ROGERS, WARDEN
98-7825 MOST, KARL A. V. BERSIN, ALAN, ET AL.
98-7829 BERGMANN, JOHN S. V. SMITH, WARDEN
98-7830 BERNTSON, JOHN D. vs. IN DIV. OF FAMILY & CHILDREN
98-7832 REESE, LARRY W. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ
98-7834 ROBENSON, LOUIS V. FLORIDA
98-7851 WIGGINS, LEROY V. SQUIRES, RICHARD E., ET AL.
98-7854 SHAIKH, ABDUL W. V. HABIB BANK LTD.
98-7871 GONZALEZ, LUIS E. V. UNITED STATES
98-7872 GRIFFITH, EVA P. V. GOTTHELF, PAUL E., ET AL.
98-7875 SHIBATA, OSCAR V. CALIFORNIA
98-7876 TRIPATI, ANANT K. V. ARIZONA
98-7880 COOKS, MICHAEL A. V. LOUISIANA
98-7914 HILL, BENNY F. V. COWART, GLENN
98-7942 HARVEY, WILLIAM E. vs. DEPT. OF JUSTICE, ET AL.
98-7977 TOBIE, JOE N. vs. DEPT. OF THE INTERIOR
98-7986 SUMMERS, EUGENE V. APFEL, COMM'R, SOCIAL SEC.
98-7993 FALES, ALTON J. V. LEHMAN, SEC., WA DOC
98-8008 RODRIGUEZ, HARRY V. FRANK, SUPT., HUNTINGDON
98-8011 RICHARDSON, BERNARD R. V. MURPHY, SANDRA
98-8018 ST. JOHN, DALE V. BOZARTH, MELINDA, ET AL.
98-8087 MANGRUM,JOE D. V. COBB, MARGARET, ET AL.
98-8106 FULTON, KEITH V. USPS
98-8115 HOCHHAUSER, BARRY V. CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
98-8163 BAKER, STANLEY V. DEPT. OF ARMY, ET AL.
98-8190 MOORE, EDWARD A. V. GROOSE, MICHAEL
98-8191 MEDINA, MARINA V. UNITED STATES
98-8214 GRANT, THOMAS R. V. UNITED STATES
98-8221 SMITH, MICHAEL H. V. BUREAU OF PRISONS, ET AL.
98-8227 SEPULVADO, EDWARD, ET UX. vs. CSC CREDIT SERVICES, ET AL.
98-8240 INGRAM, WALTER L. V. UNITED STATES
98-8242 JIMENEZ, FRANK M. V. UNITED STATES
98-8243 MOHAMED, JOAN V. vs. UNITED STATES
98-8247 SANGS, BERNARD V. UNITED STATES
98-8248 STATON, JAMES V. UNITED STATES
98-8250 WASHBURN, FRED R. V. UNITED STATES
98-8257 MURRAY, COREY A. V. UNITED STATES
98-8259 DAVIS, BOBBY A. V. UNITED STATES
98-8261 AJAJ, AHMAD M. V. UNITED STATES
98-8265 HASLIP, STEPHEN G. V. UNITED STATES
98-8266 GAMBOA, VINCENT V. USDC WD WA
98-8268 SCRUGGS, SAM R. V. UNITED STATES
98-8269 PEREZ, JORGE L. V. UNITED STATES
98-8274 SIMS, BILLY J. V. UNITED STATES
98-8280 BARNES, THEODORE N. V. OHIO
98-8287 PARA-GUERRERO, JAVIER V. UNITED STATES
98-8288 POPE, WILLIE L. V. UNITED STATES
98-8289 RYMAN, LYLE V. UNITED STATES
98-8291 SHAYESTEH, AHMAD V. UNITED STATES
98-8299 BOWERS, CHARLES H. V. UNITED STATES
98-8301 YOUNG, JOHN V. UNITED STATES
98-8302 TONEY, MARIA V. UNITED STATES
98-8303 AVERY, RONALD V. vs. UNITED STATES
98-8305 LEAL, ALDO V. UHITED STATES
98-8307 MAYFIELD, WILLIAM J. V. UNITED STATES
98-8308 NGUYEN, VINH H. V. UNITED STATES
98-8312 WARE, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
98-8313 TUCKER, LEE A. V. UNITED STATES
98-8314 BETANCUR-ALVAREZ, IVAN D. V. UNITED STATES
98-8317 CASTRO-RIVERA, JOSE V. UNITED STATES

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

98-990 PERILLO, CARMEN, ET AL. V. AT&T CORP.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

98-7889 BALDWIN, BRIAN K. V. JOHNSON, WARDEN

The motion of Former State Supreme Court Justices, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

98-8151 PARHAM, KARON A. V. COCA-COLA CO.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

98-8353 IN RE PARNELL SEATON

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

MANDAMUS DENIED

98-1294 IN RE LYNN JOHNSTON
98-1354 IN RE FREDERICK R. CATCHPOLE
98-8271 IN RE MILTON J. TAYLOR

The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.

REHEARINGS DENIED

98-1088 IN RE EILEEN VEY
98-6860 IN RE DAVID WAYNE VANDERBECK, AKA BECK
98-6952 ANSLEY, WILLIE V. GREENBUS LINES, INC., ET AL.
98-7229 CROSS, ALFRED V. UNITED STATES

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE

D-2021 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF EDWARD WALKER RECKDENWALD

Edward Walker Reckdenwald, of Rockville, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of January 19, 1999; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Edward Walker Reckdenwald is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2025 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALAN HARRIS SEGAL

Alan Harris Segal, of Newton, Massachusetts, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of January 19, 1999; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Alan Harris Segal is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2027 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN MICHAEL GILL

John Michael Gill, of Glen Burnie, Maryland, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of January 19, 1999; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and a response having been filed; It is ordered that John Michael Gill is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2028 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM PALMER EFIRD

William Palmer Efird, of Memphis, Tennessee, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of January 19, 1999; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that William Palmer Efird is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2029 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ANDREW R. PUGLIA

Andrew R. Puglia, of Winter Hill, Massachusetts, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of January 19, 1999; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Andrew R. Puglia is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2030 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL S. WEISS

Michael S. Weiss, of Mamaroneck, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of January 19, 1999; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Michael S. Weiss is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2031 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM B. CUSTER

William B. Custer, of Portland, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of January 19, 1999; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that William B. Custer is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2057 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES C. LUCAS

James C. Lucas, of Lansing, Michigan, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2058 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DANIEL B. JACOBS

Daniel B. Jacobs, of Union City, New Jersey, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2059 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL D. BLUTRICH

Michael D. Blutrich, of New York, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

RECESS ORDER

The Court will take a recess from Monday, April 5, 1999, until Monday, April 19, 1999.