The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Nguyen v. INS, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).
00-525 ACKER, CHARLES J. V. UNITED STATESThe petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).
00-963 ASHCROFT, ATTY. GEN. V. LAKE, FREDERICK A.The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Nguyen v. INS, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).
00-1194 CAMPBELL, SALLY, ET AL. V. ST. TAMMANY'S SCHOOL BD.The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 533 U.S. ____ (2001).
00-1428 RAPANOS, JOHN A. V. UNITED STATESThe petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Solid Waste Agency of No. Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001).
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
00-1577 CAIN, WARDEN V. RIDEAU, WILBERTThe motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
00-1653 GRIMES, CHARLES L. V. WETZLER, JAMES, ET AL.The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Ginsburg took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
00-10111 IN RE ISRAEL BOLANOThe petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.
00-10228 IN RE JOHN G. WESTINEThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
00-1671 IN RE JOHN KOJO MENSAHThe petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is denied.
The petitions for rehearing are denied.
00-1481 POWERS, ANN, ETC. V. CIRThe motion of petitioner for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for rehearing is denied.
Wayne B. Hollingsworth, of Naples, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Wayne B. Hollingsworth is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2239 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT J. ELKINSRobert J. Elkins, of Sarasota, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Robert J. Elkins is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2240 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARK EVAN FREDERICKMark Evan Frederick, of Destin, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Mark Evan Frederick is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2241 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RICHARD GEORGE GOMSRUDRichard George Gomsrud, of St. Paul, Minnesota, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Richard George Gomsrud is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2242 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT A. FREEMANRobert A. Freeman, of Miami, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Robert A. Freeman is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2243 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROGER A. McKEERoger A. McKee, of Phoenix, Arizona, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Roger A. McKee is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2244 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LEWIS MALAMUD SEAGULLLewis Malamud Seagull, of Westfield, New Jersey, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Lewis Malamud Seagull is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2248 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOSEPH DEE MORRISSEYJoseph Dee Morrissey, of Richmond, Virginia, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Joseph Dee Morrissey is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2249 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STEPHEN PAUL RATHJENStephen Paul Rathjen, of Hauppauge, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 20, 2001; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Stephen Paul Rathjen is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2251 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DENNIS MICHAEL BARRETTDennis Michael Barrett, of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 26, 2001; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Dennis Michael Barrett is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2252 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PAUL McGEEPaul McGee, of Atlanta, Georgia, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 26, 2001; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Paul McGee is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2253 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STEPHEN D. SIEGFRIEDStephen D. Siegfried, of Hampton Bays, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of February 26, 2001; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Stephen D. Siegfried is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
The Court will take a recess from today until Monday, June 25, 2001.