MONDAY, AUGUST 2, 1999

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

99A20 ROBERTSON, KEITH V. COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY The application for stay addressed to Justice Scalia and referred to the Court is denied.

98-1255 UNITED STATES V. MARTINEZ-SALAZAR, ABEL

The motion for appointment of counsel is granted and it is ordered that Michael D. Gordon, Esquire, of Tempe, Arizona, is appointed to serve as counsel for the respondent in this case.

REHEARINGS DENIED

98-1048 MEESTER, MARJORIE A. V. HENDERSON, POSTMASTER GEN.
98-1310 ZISK, WILLIAM, ET UX. vs. ROSEVILLE, CA, ET AL.
98-1316 ENERCON GmbH vs. U. S. INTL. TRADE COMMN.
98-1461 CONSTRUCTIVIST FNDN. V. DeKALB CTY. BD. OF TAX
98-1578 AUSTIN INDEP. SCH. DIST. V. MEYER, TED, ET AL.
98-1624 KIRK, WALTER, ET UX. vs. BERLIN PROBATE COURT, ET AL.
98-7510 HALL, ORLANDO C. V. UNITED STATES
98-7571 CROSS, ALFRED L. V. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMM'N
98-8048 PYE, WILLIE J. V. GEORGIA
98-8049 PERKINS, DAVID V. GEORGIA
98-8121 HENRY, GEORGE R. V. GEORGIA
98-8328 FORD, WILLIE T. V. SAUNDERS, WARDEN, ET AL.
98-8399 WILLIAMS, JAMES E. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ
98-8450 GAUNCE, MARTHA B. V. DeVINCENTIS, PIERRE, ET AL.
98-8501 DECKER, KURBY G. V. TEXAS
98-8507 HUTCHINSON, DARNELL V. FULCOMER, THOMAS A., ET AL.
98-8572 BELL, FREDRICK V. MISSISSIPPI
98-8577 BROOKS, KENNETH P. V. MARTIN MARIETTA, ETC., ET AL
98-8830 WASHINGTON, ANTHONY V. WILLIAMS, MAYOR
98-8883 KREHNBRINK, WILLIAM H. vs. MD STATE DEPT. OF EDUCATION
98-8884 NOVEL, DOLORES V. SALZBERG, EMILY
98-8905 IN RE TIMOTHY T. COOPER
98-8957 SEREQUEBERHAN, MERATCHEW F. V. TESFAYE, EMMANUEL
98-8962 BOYD, HENRY V. BARKLEY, LOCKE D.
98-8974 GRAY, WILLIAM T. vs. DEPT. OF ARMY
98-8996 ALLEN, VICTOR A. V. HENDERSON, POSTMASTER GEN.
98-9128 FOWLER, MICHAEL A. V. RALEIGH PARKS, ET AL.
98-9139 THOMPSON, ABRAHAM vs. USPS
98-9367 WELLS, CARL V. NEW YORK CITY, ET AL.

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

98-1783 FREEMAN, SANDRA, ET VIR V. SIMON, LENARD, ET AL.

The petition for rehearing is denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE

D-2059 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL D. BLUTRICH

Michael D. Blutrich, of New York, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of March 29, 1999; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Michael D. Blutrich is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2060 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT B. SCHAMBACH

Robert B. Schambach, of Metairie, Louisiana, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 26, 1999; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Robert B. Schambach is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2064 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DEAN A. OLDS

Dean A. Olds, of Laguna Beach, California, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 26, 1999; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Dean A. Olds is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2065 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF KEITH JOHN KULIE

Keith John Kulie, of Addison, Illinois, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 26, 1999; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Keith John Kulie is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2067 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BRYANT ASHLEY WEBB

Bryant Ashley Webb, of Woodbridge, Virginia, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 26, 1999; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Bryant Ashley Webb is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2069 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SHELDON IRWIN WALKER

Sheldon Irwin Walker, of Brooklyn, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of May 3, 1999; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Sheldon Irwin Walker is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2071 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF NORRIS D. WOOLFORK, III

Norris D. Woolfork, III, of Orlando, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of May 17, 1999; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Norris D. Woolfork, III, is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2072 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THEODORE D. WILSON

Theodore D. Wilson, of Indianapolis, Indiana, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of May 17, 1999; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Theodore D. Wilson is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2075 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GERALD MYRON COHEN

Gerald Myron Cohen, of Boston, Massachusetts, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of May 24, 1999; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Gerald Myron Cohen is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2077 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID LESTER ARNOPOLE

David Lester Arnopole, of Los Angeles, California, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of June 7, 1999; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that David Lester Arnopole is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2091 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SHELDON J. TURTLETAUB

Sheldon J. Turtletaub, of Port Washington, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2092 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID GEORGE LEWIS

David George Lewis, of White Plains, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2093 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SETH DARRYL BYKOFSKY

Seth Darryl Bykofsky, of Garden City, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2094 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THOMAS P. ONDECK

Thomas P. Ondeck, of Washington, D.C., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2095 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CHARLES AGUSTUS CONNORS, III

Charles Agustus Connors, III, of San Mateo, California, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2096 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JACK F. DURIE, JR.

Jack F. Durie, Jr., of Orlando, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2097 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN ERIC WILKES

John Eric Wilkes, of Salem, Oregon, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.