The petitions for rehearing are denied.
01-7942 PORTER, FREDRICO V. DIECAST CORP., ET AL.The motions for leave to file petitions for rehearing are denied.
Stanley Lewis Kantor, of New York, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 27, 1998; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and a response having been filed; It is ordered that Stanley Lewis Kantor is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2288 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL J. FRIESENMichael J. Friesen, of Garden City, Kansas, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of March 4, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Michael J. Friesen is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2289 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES GUY TUCKER, JR.James Guy Tucker, Jr., of Little Rock, Arkansas, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of March 4, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that James Guy Tucker, Jr., is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2292 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MILO J. ALTSCHULERMilo J. Altschuler, of Seymour, Connecticut, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 15, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Milo J. Altschuler is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2293 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DIANNE E. H. WILCOXDianne E. H. Wilcox, of Moneta, Virginia, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 15, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon her requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Dianne E. H. Wilcox is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2294 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FORRISS DUGAS ELLIOTTForriss Dugas Elliott, of St. Louis, Missouri, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 15, 2002; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that Forriss Dugas Elliott is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2295 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MALCOLM BRUCE WITTENBERGMalcolm Bruce Wittenberg, of Oakland, California, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 15, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Malcolm Bruce Wittenberg is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2296 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ANTHONY M. MAGNOTTIAnthony M. Magnotti, of Staten Island, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 15, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Anthony M. Magnotti is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2297 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GEORGE RODRIGUEZGeorge Rodriguez, of Bronx, New York, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 15, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that George Rodriguez is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2298 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JEFFREY STEVEN WEISSJeffrey Steven Weiss, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 22, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Jeffrey Steven Weiss is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2299 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JEAN GILROY GAVLICKJean Gilroy Gavlick, of Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 22, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon her requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Jean Gilroy Gavlick is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2302 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN D. GILLILANDJohn D. Gilliland, of Dallas, Texas, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 29, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that John D. Gilliland is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2303 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF K. ANTHONY WRIGHTK. Anthony Wright, of Lubbock, Texas, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 29, 2002; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; It is ordered that K. Anthony Wright is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2304 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARSHA M. HALPERNMarsha M. Halpern, of Dallas, Texas, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 29, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon her requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Marsha M. Halpern is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2305 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT J. FREJLICHRobert J. Frejlich, of Hinsdale, Illinois, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 29, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Robert J. Frejlich is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2307 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RONDOLYN RAE RAUCH O'BRIENRondolyn Rae Rauch O'Brien, of Albuquerque, New Mexico, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of May 28, 2002; and a rule having been issued and served upon her requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred; and the time to file a response having expired; It is ordered that Rondolyn Rae Rauch O'Brien is disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2331 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF RICHARD STEVENSRichard Stevens, of New York, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2332 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF ROBERT G. HARLEYRobert G. Harley, of Brooklyn, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2333 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF ISRAEL WEINSTOCKIsrael Weinstock, of Belle Harbor, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-2334 IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF BRADLEY HAROLD LOCKENVITZBradley Harold Lockenvitz, of Linn, Missouri, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.