<& /inclusions/htmlhead.htm &>
Order list
<& /inclusions/header.htm &>
U.S. Supreme Court Orders
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2014
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
126, ORIG.
KANSAS V. NEBRASKA AND COLORADO
13-433
INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS V. BUSK, JESSE, ET AL.
The motions of the Solicitor General for leave to participate
in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument are
granted.
13-435
OMNICARE, INC., ET AL. V. LABORERS DIST. COUNCIL, ET AL.
The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate
in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is
granted. The time is to be divided as follows: 30 minutes
for the petitioners, 20 minutes for the respondents, and 10
minutes for the Solicitor General.
13-517
WARGER, GREGORY P. V. SHAUERS, RANDY D.
The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate
in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is
granted.
13-534
NC BD. OF DENTAL EXAMINERS V. FTC
The motion of American Optometric Association, et al. for
leave to file a brief as amici curiae out of time is denied.
13-854
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. V. SANDOZ, INC., ET AL.
The motion of petitioners for leave to file Volume 4 of the
joint appendix under seal is granted. The motion of the
Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as
amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted.
13-975
T-MOBILE SOUTH V. ROSWELL, GA
The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate
in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is
granted.
APPEAL - JURISDICTION POSTPONED
13-1314
AZ STATE LEGISLATURE V. AZ INDEP. REDISTRICTING, ET AL.
Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction is
postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits limited to the following questions: 1) Do the Elections Clause of the United States Constitution and
2 U. S. C. §2a(c) permit Arizona’s use of a commission to adopt congressional districts?
2) Does the Arizona Legislature have standing to bring this suit?
CERTIORARI GRANTED
13-550
TIBBLE, GLENN, ET AL. V. EDISON INTERNATIONAL, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to
the following question: “Whether a claim that ERISA plan
fiduciaries breached their duty of prudence by offering
higher-cost retail-class mutual funds to plan participants, even
though identical lower-cost institution-class mutual funds were
available, is barred by
29 U. S. C. §1113(1) when fiduciaries
initially chose the higher-cost mutual funds as plan investments
more than six years before the claim was filed."
13-1333
COLEMAN, ANDRE L. V. TOLLEFSON, TODD, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
13-1352
OHIO V. CLARK, DARIUS
The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is
granted.