From the Legal Information Institute and Project Hermes

[Other parts of the opinion, WordPerfect versions, and related documents]

ORDER LIST TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1992 CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
91-7800 CHEW-VILLASANA, FELIPE E. V. INS
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of the decision in Texas v. Felipe Chew (County Court of Duval County, February 26, 1992).
92-26 REED, ELDON S. V. DRUMMOND, VICTORIA C.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Patterson v. Shumate, 504 U. S. (1992).
92-90 VIRTUAL MAINTENANCE, INC. V. PRIME COMPUTER, INC.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Eastman Kodak Company v. Image Technical Services, Inc., 504 U. S. (1992).
92-203 ARKANSAS-PLATTE & GULF PART. V. DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U. S. (1992).

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

No. RUBIN LAMAR PHILLIPS V. CITY OF THOMASTON, ET AL. The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time is denied. A 229 TIMOTHY A. DeWITT V. FOLEY, SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE The application for stay addressed to Justice Scalia and referred to the Court is denied.
D-1119 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES F. O'HARA
It having been reported to the Court that James F. O'Hara, of Little Rock, Arkansas, has resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of Arkansas and this Court by order of May 18, 1992, having suspended the said James F. O'Hara from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said James F. O'Hara be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1130 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES R. BANDY
It having been reported to the Court that James R. Bandy, of River Rouge, Michigan, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Michigan and this Court by order of June 1, 1992, having suspended the said James R. Bandy from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said James R. Bandy be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1131 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES R. BRITTON
It having been reported to the Court that James R. Britton, of Bismarck, North Dakota, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of North Dakota and this Court by order of June 8, 1992, having suspended the said James R. Britton from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said James R. Britton be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1132 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARVIN L. KAISER
It having been reported to the Court that Marvin L. Kaiser, of Williston, North Dakota, has been suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of North Dakota and this Court by order of June 8, 1992, having suspended the said Marvin L. Kaiser from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Marvin L. Kaiser be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1133 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF VINCENT THOMAS SNYDER
It having been reported to the Court that Vincent Thomas Snyder, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, has resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, and this Court by order of June 8, 1992, having suspended the said Vincent Thomas Snyder from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred; And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time to file a response has expired; It is ordered that the said Vincent Thomas Snyder be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
D-1142 IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT WILLIAM SHAUGHNESSY
Robert William Shaughnessy, of Miami, Florida, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, heretofore issued on June 29, 1992, is hereby discharged.
D-1148 IN THE MATTER OF JOHN P. TREVASKIS, JR.
It having been reported to the Court by John Rogers Carroll, of Media, Pennsylvania, that John P. Trevaskis, Jr., has died, the Rule to Show Cause, heretofore issued on August 18, 1992, is hereby discharged.
D-1166 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID L. BRODSKY
It is ordered that David L. Brodsky, of Clive, Iowa, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-1167 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN L. BOETTNER JR.
It is ordered that John L. Boettner Jr., of Charleston, West Virginia, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-1168 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF CARL M. MITCHELL
It is ordered that Carl M. Mitchell, of Hauppauge, New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-1169 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM M. MULDERIG
It is ordered that William M. Mulderig, of Tallman, New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-1170 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GEORGE SANDBERG
It is ordered that George Sandberg, of Patchogue, New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-1171 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF RICHARD DENNIS SIMON
It is ordered that Richard Dennis Simon, of Hauppauge, New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-1172 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALLAN HAROLD RAUCH
It is ordered that Allan Harold Rauch, of Des Moines, Iowa, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-1173 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STEVEN J. ROMER
It is ordered that Steven J. Romer, of Fishkill, New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-1174 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN T. TATE JR.
It is ordered that John T. Tate Jr., of Pasadena, California, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
D-1175 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM JAMES HICKEY
It is ordered that William James Hickey, of Bakersfield, California, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
91-790 ) CSX TRANS., INC. V. EASTERWOOD, LIZZIE
)
91-1206 ) EASTERWOOD, LIZZIE V. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
The motion of the Solicitor General to permit William K. Kelley, Esquire, to present oral argument pro hac vice is granted.
91-2012 HOLDER, JACKIE, ETC., ET AL. V. HALL, E.K., ET AL.
92-74 DEPT. OF REVENUE OF OREGON V. ACF INDUSTRIES, ET AL.
The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in these cases expressing the views of the United States.
92-5505 DEAN, THOMAS G. V. SMITH, ELLEN, ET AL.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 3, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. Justice Stevens, dissenting: For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), I would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
92-5542 HUDSON, ROBERT V. NEW YORK
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 3, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court. Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens, dissenting: For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., 464 U.S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 92 5794 COTTAM, LARRY V. LUZERNE COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERV. (A 244) The application for stay addressed to Justice O'Connor and referred to the Court is denied. CERTIORARI GRANTED
91-2079 GOOD SAMARITAN HOSP., ET AL. V. SULLIVAN, SEC., H&HS
92-102 DAUBERT, WM., ET AL. V. MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS
The petitions for writ of certiorari are granted.
91-7604 ANTOINE, JEFFERY V. BYERS & ANDERSON, INC., ET AL.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted.

CERTIORARI DENIED

91-7913 BROWN, GEORGE A. V. ESTELLE, WARDEN
91-8407 WHEELER, LORENZO V. SIMS, OFFICER, ET AL.
91-8451 STARLING, BILL V. UNITED STATES
91-8498 WALLACE, CHESTER F. V. NORTH CAROLINA
91-8518 CARPINO, JOSEPH M. V. DEMOSTHENES, PETE, ET AL.
91-8607 CARD, DAVID L. V. IDAHO
91-8628 FERDIK, MICHAEL H. V. BONZELET, JOE, ET AL.
91-8713 JENKINS, ROBERT V. PURKETT, SUPT.
92-6 BOLADO, MARK V. UNITED STATES
92-17 POLLARD, JONATHAN J. V. UNITED STATES
92-64 TUCKER, LARRY A. V. UNITED STATES
92-69 CLARK, ICELEAN, ET AL. V. JENKINS, KALMIA, ET AL.
92-79 KAIMOWITZ, GABE V. FREDERICK, BILL, ETC., ET AL.
92-123 WILLIAMS, EARLUS L. V. UNITED STATES
92-128 BEDELL, LESLIE, ET AL. V. MARTIN, SEC. OF LABOR, ET AL.
92-130 BUILDING & CONSTR. TRADES V. MARTIN, SEC. OF LABOR
92-141 ) PORTER, CHARLES J. V. UNITED STATES
)
92-5280 ) CHIARELLI, GENO V. UNITED STATES
)
92-5314 ) DURISH, ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES
)
92-5367 ) RAUCCI, LOUIS F. V. UNITED STATES
)
92-5368 ) PORTER, WILLIAM R. V. UNITED STATES
92-149 PULSAR DATA SYSTEMS V. FED. MKT. CONSULTANTS
92-151 CA HOUSING SECURITIES, INC. V. UNITED STATES
92-273 ALLEN, CALVIN A. V. UNITED STATES
92-275 HAMILTON, JAMES, ET AL. V. KOMATSU-DRESSER INC., ET AL.
92-276 KRIETER, MARIE V. CHILES, GOV. OF FL, ET AL.
92-277 PoPEOPLE, INC. V. LABOR & IND. COMMN., ET AL.
92-281 BERRY, JAGDISH, ET AL. V. PROFESSIONALS, INC., ET AL.
92-283 DIXON, RONALD L., ET AL. V. OGDEN NEWSPAPERS, INC.
92-287 WALLER, THOMAS G., ET AL. V. OSBOURNE, OZZY, ET AL.
92-288 SAKER, THEODORE V. LUPER, FRED
92-290 FESTA, FRANK J. V. NJ BD. OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
92-291 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO. V. GRASSI, ALEXANDER, ET AL.
92-293 NY CITY DEPT. HOUSING, ETC. V. KRAEBEL, BARBARA, ETC.
92-295 LUFKIN, LANCE V. McCALLUM, CHARLES A., ET AL.
92-296 SCHMIER, MICHAEL K., ET AL. V. KAPLAN, TERRY S., ET AL.
92-299 GOTZL, JOSEPH V. CANTRELL, DIANE
92-301 TEXAS V. JIMENEZ, ROBERT LYNN
92-303 SLATER, ALBERT V. OPTICAL RADIATION CORP.
92-306 ROSENTHAL, JEROME B. V. CONRAD, ROBERT NOLAN, ET AL.
92-309 AHAM-NEZE, L. OBIOMA V. SOHIO SUPPLY CO., ET AL.
92-310 O'QUINN, SHIRLEY V. WEDCO TECHNOLOGY INC.
92-312 CROZIER, JAMES E., ETC. V. BRADFORD, THERON, TRUSTEE
92-314 BIERDEMAN, LAURYN A. V. SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC.
92-316 PFLUGER, ROBERT V. CIR
92-318 GILMAN, PATRICIA COYLE V. GILMAN, ROBERT H.
92-319 BD. CTY. COMMRS. SAN JUAN V. LIBERTY GROUP, ET AL.
92-321 ELDRIDGE, ANTHONY V. EZELL, LOUIS C., ET AL.
92-327 KELLY, JACK D., ETC. V. TREE FARM DEV., ET AL.
92-328 INGRAM, CLARK R., ET AL. V. PENNSYLANIA DEPT. ENVIRON.
92-330 COLLINS, O. J. V. KENTUCKY
92-331 HARPER, HENRY M. V. ALABAMA
92-334 SANCHEZ, FILEMON SOTELO V. UNITED STATES
92-342 NEILSON, N. L. V. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
92-345 CAROLCO TELEVISION, INC. V. NBC, INC.
92-347 COX, LEARY V. BOUDREAUX CIVIC ASSN., ET AL.
92-348 BIBLE TEMPLE, ETC., ET AL. V. OREGON EMP. DIV., ET AL.
92-349 LEAL, LEOPOLDO, ET AL. V. SUN OIL COMPANY, ET AL.
92-353 GAMBOCZ, BILL J. V. McCALLUM, CAROLINE, ET AL.
92-354 DeCARLO, CHARLES L. V. FLORIDA
92-366 RUWITCH, FLORA ANN, ETC. V. WILLIAM PENN LIFE, ETC.
92-376 ANTZOULATOS, DENNIS G. V. UNITED STATES
92-377 CARPENTER, PAUL B. V. UNITED STATES
92-405 M & M REFORESTATION, ET AL. V. SAIF CORPORATION, ET AL.
92-406 MELECHINSKY, ANDREW, ET AL. V. ANDERSEN, WILLIAM
92-411 MUNOZ, PERFECTO S. V. UNITED STATES
92-412 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUS. V. WILLIAMS AVIATION CO.
92-424 REILLY, EDWIN V. IRS
92-429 MADSON, MARTIN M. V. MADSON, JANIE
92-439 WEISS, PAUL A. V. GRIEVANCE COMM. TENTH DIST.
92-447 WILLIS, OTIS V. SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO.
92-5161 NAGHDI, JAVID V. UNITED STATES
92-5166 CHAPMAN, CALDWELL V. UNITED STATES
92-5200 CHESTNA, MARY LOU V. UNITED STATES
92-5241 CABRERA, WINSTON V. UNITED STATES
92-5250 SHANKLIN, BILLY V. UNITED STATES
92-5283 HERNANDEZ, PEDRO, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
92-5284 VANCE, STANLEY L. V. UNITED STATES
92-5454 WANZER, JERRY V. COLLINS, JOE
92-5455 WHITLEY, CALVIN V. SENKOWSKI, SUPT., CLINTON
92-5456 ANDREWS, MAURICE V. TEXAS
92-5457 ALLEN, ISAAC EDWARD V. DOWD, WARDEN
92-5469 RIVERA, HECTOR V. LANE, MICHAEL
92-5478 TOSADO, PEDRO LUIS V. LACOBELLE, ROBERT, ET AL.
92-5480 ANTONELLI, MICHAEL C. V. BEELER, WARDEN ET AL.
92-5484 MACIAS, RENE FUENTES V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
92-5490 BAKER, SALLY MARIE V. MICHIGAN, ET AL.
92-5491 JONES, SYLVESTER V. CHECKETT, DONNA, ET AL.
92-5493 FAULK, JEREMY V. TX DEPT. HUMAN SVCS., ET AL.
92-5501 WHORF, KARL V. DuBOIS, COMMR., MA DOC
92-5502 SLATON, NAWATHA V. CITY OF EVANSVILLE, ET AL.
92-5510 FOSTER, LaFONDA F. V. KENTUCKY
92-5511 FISHER, THOMAS J. V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ, ET AL
92-5513 TITUS, MARY V. BUGYI, MARTIN
92-5515 PINHOLSTER, SCOTT LYNN V. CALIFORNIA
92-5523 PAPANIA, JEROME R. V. 14TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
92-5530 OWEN, DUANE V. FLORIDA
92-5531 WADDY, WARREN V. OHIO
92-5533 KINSLOW, JIMMY N. V. TANSY, WARDEN
92-5537 HARRIS, HERBERT W. V. MISSOURI, ET AL.
92-5538 JOHNSON, REFORD D. V. KAISER, WARDEN, ET AL.
92-5540 BOSTON, J. B. V. ILLINOIS
92-5541 WILLIAMS, JOSEPH V. IDAHO STATE BAR
92-5543 COTTEN, CHARLES V. COTTEN, ALICE
92-5544 STEWART, LEONARD V. UNITED STATES
92-5546 ARIO, CLEVELAND V. GOMEZ, WARDEN, ET AL.
92-5552 ARNOLD, KEITHIAN L. V. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION
92-5553 WRIGHT, TROY V. LOUISIANA
92-5559 MARTIN, FREDERICK V. ROBERTS, DEPUTY SECRETARY
92-5563 PEAVEY, MORRIS J. V. POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE
92-5565 ROBINSON, BEVERLY V. MT DEPT. OF FAMILY SERVICES
92-5566 PEARCE, CHARLES L. V. UNITED STATES
92-5572 SIMPSON, DENNIS GALE V. SIMPSON, MARCIA LYNN
92-5575 TUCKER, LaDONNA V. TUCKER, TRACY, ET AL.
92-5581 MITCHELL, EMMANUEL V. EBERHART, WARDEN
92-5582 MITCHELL, EMMANUEL V. BASS, ASST. COMM.
92-5583 PETERS, RANDY V. ARMONTROUT, ASST. DIRECTOR
92-5585 PICKARD, JOHN A. V. COMM. ON CHARACTER & FITNESS
92-5586 TWYMAN, ROBERT V. ALABAMA
92-5588 HOWER, CLYDE O. V. OHIO
92-5589 HIGGASON, JAMES H. V. DUCKWORTH, SUPT., ET AL.
92-5590 LEISURE, DAVID V. MISSOURI
92-5591 TAYLOR, ROOSEVELT V. BARBER, EDNA, ET AL.
92-5598 TUCKER, WILLIE LEE V. SHERATON CENTURY HOTEL
92-5600 YOUNG, MATTHEW ROBERT V. ZENON, SUPT., OREGON CI
92-5601 BOYD, TERRENCE V. CONNECTICUT
92-5605 WINTERS, CLYDE V. IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
92-5606 DIXON, DANA V. ALABAMA
92-5612 DELEGAL, RODNEY F. V. UNITED STATES
92-5616 PIERCE, RALPH V. TRIPPETT, WARDEN
92-5617 LOYA, JOSE A. V. PURKETT, SUPT., ET AL.
92-5619 DUNMORE, TOMMIE L. V. UNITED STATES
92-5621 CASH, FREDDIE V. FLORIDA
92-5625 JONES, AUTRY L. V. COLLINS, DIR., TEXAS DCJ
92-5626 JONES, JERRY L. V. CASPARI, SUPT.
92-5627 GUTHRIE, HELEN V. DC DEPT. OF EMP. SERV.
92-5630 JONES, FLORENCE L. V. UNITED STATES
92-5631 GETZ, CHARLES R. V. DELAWARE, ET AL.
92-5634 LANGARICA, HERMELIO G. V. NEVADA
92-5638 GRAY, STEVIE A. V. UNITED STATES
92-5639 ABUSAYED, ABED S. V. UNITED STATES
92-5645 MIRANDA, VALERIO E. V. COOPER, WARDEN, ET AL.
92-5659 REED, JACK CARLTON V. UNITED STATES
92-5670 JONES, RICKY L. V. THOMPSON, WARDEN
92-5680 CRAWFORD, DELBERT V. UNITED STATES
92-5684 YARBROW, ALBERT V. UNITED STATES
92-5685 WILLIAMS, HERBERT V. UNITED STATES
92-5686 SARDIN, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES
92-5687 SHIPLEY, BENJAMIN V. UNITED STATES
92-5696 TAYLOR, JOHN B. V. UNITED STATES
92-5698 TYREE, JEFFREY W. V. UNITED STATES
92-5699 ALVARADO, JOHN J. V. UNITED STATES
92-5701 MITCHAM, STEPHAN L. V. CALIFORNIA
92-5702 LOPEZ, ORLANDO V. UNITED STATES
92-5703 LANE, COREY S. V. UNITED STATES
92-5704 LUSCHEN, PHILLIP V. UNITED STATES
92-5705 ROBINSON, ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES
92-5706 PEDRAZA-RUIZ, JOSE L. V. UNITED STATES
92-5707 NELSON, KENNETH V. UNITED STATES
92-5713 COLEMAN, MONROE V. UNITED STATES
92-5716 DONALDSON, THEODORE A. V. UNITED STATES
92-5717 PLUMMER, RONALD V. UNITED STATES
92-5726 HORNICK, THOMAS H. V. UNITED STATES
92-5729 RODRIGUEZ, MERCEDES V. UNITED STATES
92-5731 MADRID, JAIME G. V. UNITED STATES
92-5732 TROMBLEY, TIMOTHY V. UNITED STATES
92-5734 RUSHER, SARAH J. V. UNITED STATES
92-5736 DEBROW, KURTIS W. V. UNITED STATES
92-5741 JENKINS, MICHAEL L. V. UNITED STATES
92-5742 GREEN, O'CONNER B. V. UNITED STATES
92-5744 ORGERON, SAMUEL V. UNITED STATES
92-5746 CASTRO-POUPART, HENRY V. UNITED STATES
92-5753 CASTILLO, MARIO V. UNITED STATES
92-5755 SUAREZ-BERMUDES, CARLOS V. UNITED STATES
92-5756 SOSA, RAMON V. UNITED STATES
92-5757 VILLARREAL, REYNALDO, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
92-5759 TAYLOR, ELMER F. V. UNITED STATES
92-5763 BARNES, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES
92-5764 SHORES, CHARLES W. V. UNITED STATES
92-5767 FRAZIER, TIMOTHY H. V. UNITED STATES
92-5773 GORDON, CALVIN V. UNITED STATES
92-5776 HARVEY, ROBERT L. V. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
92-5778 PATINO, JOHN V. UNITED STATES
92-5779 NIXON, JIMMY V. UNITED STATES
92-5780 REYES, HECTOR L. V. UNITED STATES
92-5781 McGLYNN, DIANA V. UNITED STATES
92-5782 MICHEL, LEWIS D. V. UNITED STATES
92-5783 NELSON, BOBBY V. UNITED STATES
92-5787 REED, ARTIS O. V. UNITED STATES
92-5799 CARPENTER, JAMES E. V. UNITED STATES
92-5806 GIRALDO-GIRALDO, ADOLFO V. UNITED STATES
92-5807 ELLIS, CALVIN V. UNITED STATES
92-5809 GOMEZ, FELIX J. V. UNITED STATES
92-5811 CONTENT, GENE J. V. UNITED STATES
92-5819 FARMER, THEODORE V. WALKER, SUPT.
92-5820 ) HENRY, BILLY J. V. UNITED STATES
)
92-5821 ) HATCH, WILLIAM D. V. UNITED STATES
)
92-5823 ) HAMMONDS, JON P. V. UNITED STATES
92-5825 HEALEY, ROBERT L. V. UNITED STATES
92-5829 HERNANDEZ, MARTA I. V. UNITED STATES
92-5831 ALVAREZ-GARCIA, JULIO A. V. UNITED STATES
92-5834 THOMAS, JACQUELINE M. V. UNITED STATES
92-5835 ZULETA, NERIO V. UNITED STATES
92-5837 TSOSIE, GEORGE V. UNITED STATES
92-5838 ALEX, RONALD V. UNITED STATES
92-5839 DE LOS ANGELES, YUDELKA V. UNITED STATES
92-5853 SAVARD, CHARLES M. V. UNITED STATES
92-5860 GAY, BENJAMIN F. V. UNITED STATES
92-5861 MEIER, DAVID V. UNITED STATES
92-5863 OKORO, EMMANUEL O. V. UNITED STATES
92-5875 JONES, ANDRE V. McCAUGHTRY, WARDEN
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
91-6576 JOHNSON, MARVIN E. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Blackmun, Justice O'Connor and Justice Souter would grant the petition, vacate the judgment and remand the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Sawyer v. Whitley, 505 U. S. (1992).
91-8167 ) SMITH, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES
)
91-8328 ) HARRIS, LAMAR V. UNITED STATES
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice White would grant certiorari. Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
91-8333 PALMER, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
92-2 ASHLEY, WARDEN V. BYERLY, RICKY
The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
92-72 SABINE CONSOLIDATED, ET AL. V. TEXAS
92-5049 THOMPSON, ALVIN F. V. UNITED STATES
92-5214 RAMOS, SAMUEL G. V. UNITED STATES
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Justice White would grant certiorari.
92-174 VAN CAMP, DERALD V. AT&T INFORMATION SYSTEMS
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
92-267 UJB FINANCIAL CORP., ET AL. V. SHAPIRO, IRWIN, ET AL.
The motion of Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of New York Clearing House Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of American Bankers Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
92-285 KEENE CORPORATION V. LINDSAY, TONY
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice White and Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.
92-297 KOONS, JEFF V. ROGERS, ART, ET AL.
The motion of National Artists Equity Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
92-5556 OMOIKE, ISAAC I. V. COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
92-5800 GAMBLE, KATHLEEN H. V. EAU CLAIRE CTY., WISCONSIN
The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment is denied. MANDAMUS DENIED
92-326 IN RE JESSIE D. McDONALD
92-5527 IN RE JULES SMITH
92-5564 IN RE CARLTON WALKER
92-5596 IN RE WILLIAM C. ELLIS
The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
92-265 IN RE DANIEL VASQUEZ
The petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot.

ASSIGNMENT ORDER

An order of the Chief Justice designating and assigning Justice Powell (Retired) to perform judicial duties in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on September 28 and 30, 1992, and for such time as may be required to complete unfinished business, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 294(a), is ordered entered on the minutes of this Court, nunc pro tunc, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 295.

RECESS ORDER

The Court will take a recess from Monday, October 19, 1992 until Monday, November 2, 1992.

MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION

The written motions for admission of the following lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:
This archive is a service of the Legal Information Institute.