MONDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2022
CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
21-1418SANTOS, MEDARDO Q. V. UNITED STATES
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Xiulu Ruan v. United States, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
21-1572DOMINO'S PIZZA, LLC V. CARMONA, EDMOND
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon, 596 U. S. ___ (2022).
22-5061JOSEPH, DEWAYNE V. UNITED STATES
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Concepcion v. United States, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
22-5075NEWMAN, COURTNEY V. UNITED STATES with
22-5076WOMACK, HOLLI V. UNITED STATES
22-5077CLEMONS, CYNTHIA V. UNITED STATES
22-5346HOFSTETTER, SYLVIA V. UNITED STATES
The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated, and the cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Xiulu Ruan v. United States, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
22M22LABRANCHE, AMOS V. SCHUMACHER/FFVA MUTUAL INSURANCE
22M23KOMATSU, TOWAKI V. CUBESMART, ET AL.
The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time are denied.
22-22TROPP, DAVID A. V. TRAVEL SENTRY, INC., ET AL.
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
22-5424ARREOLA-OCHOA, JESUS M. V. GARLAND, ATT'Y GEN.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 7, 2022, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
CERTIORARI DENIED
21-462JOHNSON, JOLIE, ET AL. V. BETHANY HOSPICE
21-936U.S., EX REL. OWSLEY V. FAZZI ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL.
21-1145MOLINA HEALTHCARE OF IL, ET AL. V. PROSE, THOMAS
21-1394FITISEMANU, JOHN, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
21-1464GULLEY, EMOND S. V. KANSAS
21-7648CEJA, LUIS F. V. UNITED STATES
21-8017MEALS, STEPHEN S. V. UNITED STATES
22-44HARRIS, WESTLEY D. V. ALABAMA
22-52ARIYAN, INC., ET AL. V. SEWERAGE & WATER BD., ET AL.
22-122SNYDER, PHILIP V. TENTH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
22-145CHEN, AIDONG V. KPMG LLP, ET AL.
22-151HOUSTON, LASEAN D. V. ESTATE OF HOUSTON, ET AL.
22-153BOWLING, WANDA V. DAHLHEIMER, LESTER J., ET AL.
22-162ALABBASSI, TARIQ B. V. WORMUTH, SEC. OF ARMY
22-164STUART, MARK E. V. GERLACH, JUDGE, ETC., ET AL.
22-169LIN, JAY, ET UX. V. HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK, ET AL.
22-171CENTRO MéDICO DEL TURABO, INC. V. UNIóN GENERAL DE TRABAJADORES
22-173SWARTZ, ROGER V. BD. OF TRUSTEES UNIV. PA, ET AL.
22-183COWAN, BRYAN, ET AL. V. NATHANIEL, WARDEN
22-189LUKASHIN, IGOR V. WA DEPT. OF REVENUE
22-198SEN, AYSE V. AMAZON.COM, INC.
22-248TAWNEY, LARRY V. PORTAGE COUNTY, OH, ET AL.
22-257ADELL, LORRAINE V. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
22-262WALKER, BERKLEY V. V. BOKF, N.A.
22-280BUTTAR, RASHID A. V. REDDY, RACHAN D.
22-5109SANCHEZ, TEDDY B. V. BROOMFIELD, WARDEN
22-5306RIFE, MICKY V. UNITED STATES
22-5356BOURGEOIS, JOSEPH M. V. TEXAS
22-5357DEANNA D. V. TN DEPT. OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES
22-5361BUSTOS, ERNEST V. BEXAR APPRAISAL DIST., ET AL.
22-5362GARCIA, AGUSTIN V. NEW JERSEY
22-5369GARDNER, MILTON L. V. LUMPKIN, DIR., TX DCJ
22-5375WAUGH, NATHANIEL V. RALPH, A., ET AL.
22-5383GIOVANNI, LYNN M. V. NEW JERSEY
22-5385J. S. V. TEXAS
22-5396HILL, TIMOTHY J. V. OKLAHOMA
22-5405SAWANO, PERRY V. COLORADO
22-5409BOWMAN, JAMAL A. V. MICHIGAN
22-5443DAVIS, ROBERT L. V. MOODY, ATT'Y GEN. OF FL, ET AL.
22-5447SCHNEIDER, CHRISTOPHER V. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ET AL.
22-5448CASSIDY, ROGER C. V. FLORIDA
22-5462IRICK, WILBUR V. NEW YORK
22-5537RENDON, JOSEPH W. V. IOWA
22-5593RODRIGUEZ, RICHARD A. V. CALIFORNIA
22-5603SANCHEZ-LUGO, FAUSTINO V. UNITED STATES
22-5606AMPARANO-TORRES, JESUS G. V. UNITED STATES
22-5610THOMPSON, ANDRE V. UNITED STATES
22-5614GORDON, MICHAEL L. V. UNITED STATES
22-5623DAY, FREDA J. V. WINFREY, OPRAH, ET AL.
22-5635BRIK, VLADIMIR V. V. UNITED STATES
22-5641REED, JAY E. V. UNITED STATES
22-5663RONEY, DANNY T. V. UNITED STATES
The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
22-5354NOBLE, RICARDO L. V. PENNSYLVANIA
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
22-5358MILLER, JAMES L. V. KASHANI, AMIR, ET AL.
22-5609WILMORE, HERVE V. UNITED STATES
The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied, and the petitions for writs of certiorari are dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
22-5650IN RE BOBBY D. HATHAWAY-BEY
22-5651IN RE RANDOLPH L. CARR-EL
The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.
MANDAMUS DENIED
22-5347IN RE CHARLES E. JONES
22-5374IN RE DARRIS NEWSOME
22-5384IN RE RANDELL J. REDMOND
22-5398IN RE DOUGLAS C. JACKSON
22-5407IN RE JAMES R. AUSTIN
The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
22-5388IN RE ROSZETTA M. McNEILL
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).