i> BOB SLAGLE, CHAIRMAN, TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY LOUIS TERRAZAS et al."> i> BOB SLAGLE, CHAIRMAN, TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY v. LOUIS TERRAZAS et al."> <em></em>Slagle v. Terrazas, 506 U.S. 801 (1992)

Supreme Court of the United States From the Legal Information Institute and Project Hermes

[Other parts of the opinion, WordPerfect versions, and related documents]

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES BOB SLAGLE, CHAIRMAN, TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY v. LOUIS TERRAZAS et al.

on appeal from the united states district court for the western district of texas

No. 91-1546. Decided October 5, 1992

The judgment is affirmed.

Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Blackmun joins, dissenting.

The Report of the Special Committee of the Fifth Circuit Judicial Council demonstrated that neither corruption nor improper motive affected the District Court's determination of the boundaries of Senate Districts 19 and 26. Nevertheless, the procedures that were followed in drawing the boundaries of those districts as established in the order under review represented such a serious departure from procedures that should be observed in fashioning relief in adversary litigation that I would vacate the judgment of the District Court with instructions to redraw the boundaries of those two Senate Districts after the parties have been given an adequate opportunity to be heard on issues that relate to those two districts.

This archive is a service of the Legal Information Institute.