Dissent [ Rehnquist ] |
---|
HTML version WordPerfect version |
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash ington, D.C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No.
WALTER LEE, SUPERINTENDENT OF PORT AUTHORITY POLICE, PETITIONER v. INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS, INC., et al.
on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit
[
For the reasons expressed in the opinions of Justice O'Connor, Justice Kennedy, and Justice Souter in International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee, see ante, p. 1 (O'Connor, J., concurring in No. 91-155 and concurring in judgment in No. 91-339), ante, p. 1 (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment), and ante, p. 1 (Souter, J., concurring in judgment in No. 91-339 and dissenting in No. 91-155), the judgment of the Court of Appeals holding that the ban on distribution of literature in the Port Authority airport terminals is invalid under the First Amendment is
Affirmed.