Search

Primary tabs

Search results

  1. SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC., Petitioner v. MEMBERS OF THE NEW YORK STATE CRIME VICTIMS BOARD, et al.

    THE NEW YORK STATE CRIME VICTIMS BOARD, et al. No. 90-1059. Argued: Oct. 15, 1991. Decided: Dec. 10, ... contracting with a person "accused or convicted of a crime" for the production of a book or other ... work describing the crime must pay to respondent Crime Victims Board any moneys owed to that person ...

  2. SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC., Petitioner v. MEMBERS OF THE NEW YORK STATE CRIME VICTIMS BOARD, et al.

    THE NEW YORK STATE CRIME VICTIMS BOARD, et al. No. 90-1059. Argued: Oct. 15, 1991. Decided: Dec. 10, ... contracting with a person "accused or convicted of a crime" for the production of a book or other ... work describing the crime must pay to respondent Crime Victims Board any moneys owed to that person ...

  3. Calder v. Bull

    they may declare new crimes; and establish rules of conduct for all its citizens in future cases; they ... punish innocence as a crime; or violate the right of an antecedent lawful private contract; or the right ... judgments; and an exercise of judicial power. Sometimes they respected the crime, by declaring acts to be ...

  4. Calder v. Bull

    they may declare new crimes; and establish rules of conduct for all its citizens in future cases; they ... punish innocence as a crime; or violate the right of an antecedent lawful private contract; or the right ... judgments; and an exercise of judicial power. Sometimes they respected the crime, by declaring acts to be ...

  5. R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul

    inter alia, the St. Paul, Minnesota, Bias-Motivated Crime Ordinance, which prohibits the display of ... chose to charge petitioner (then a juvenile) was the St. Paul Bias-Motivated Crime Ordinance, St. Paul, ... are presumptively invalid. Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of N.Y. State Crime Victims Bd., 502 ...

  6. 549 U.S. 7

    circumstance which extenuates the gravity of the crime even though it is not a legal excuse for the ... crime,” an instruction known as “factor (k)” under California’s then-applicable ... bears upon the commission of the crime by the defendant and excuses or mitigates his culpability for the ...

  7. SOUTHERN UNION CO. v. UNITED STATES

    a prior conviction) that increases the maximum punishment authorized for a particular crime be proved to ... the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and ... imprisonment based on violation of a “hate crime”statute). While the punishments at stake in those cases were ...

  8. UNITED STATES v. SANTOS

    predicate crimes, “receipts” for others, is contrary to this Court’s precedents ... includes gross revenues from the sale of contraband and the operation of organized crime syndicates ... one can engage in a financial transaction with either receipts or profits of a crime; one can intend ...

  9. SOUTHERN UNION CO. v. UNITED STATES

    a prior conviction) that increases the maximum punishment authorized for a particular crime be proved to ... the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and ... imprisonment based on violation of a “hate crime”statute). While the punishments at stake in those cases were ...

  10. SOUTHERN UNION CO. v. UNITED STATES

    a prior conviction) that increases the maximum punishment authorized for a particular crime be proved to ... the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and ... imprisonment based on violation of a “hate crime”statute). While the punishments at stake in those cases were ...

Pages