LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Plff. in Err., v. N. P. SCOTT.
219 U.S. 209
31 S.Ct. 171
55 L.Ed. 183
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Plff. in Err.,
v.
N. P. SCOTT.
No. 286.
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued October 19, 20, 1910.
January 3, 1911
Messrs. Charles H. Moorman, Joseph R. Lamar, Benjamin D. Warfield, and Henry L. Stone for plaintiff in error.
Assistant to the Attorney General Kenyon as amicus curioe.
No counsel for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Lurton delivered the opinion of the court:
This case was heard with No. 215, Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Riverside Mills, just decided. [219 U. S. 186, 55 L. ed. ——, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep. 164.] Like that case it presents only the question of the constitutionality of the Carmack amendment of the act to regulate commerce.
The facts are not substantially different, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals of the Commonwealth of Kentucky is affirmed upon the authority of that case.
Affirmed.
The following state regulations pages link to this page.