Search

Primary tabs

Did you mean
election

Search results

  1. STATE OF OHIO ON RELATION OF DAVID DAVIS, Plff. in Err., v. CHARLES Q. HILDEBRANT, Secretary of State of Ohio, State Supervisor and Inspector of Elections, and State Supervisor of Elections, et al.

    Err., v. CHARLES Q. HILDEBRANT, Secretary of State of Ohio, State Supervisor and Inspector of Elections ... , and State Supervisor of Elections, et al. No. 987. Decided: June 12, 1916. opinion, White [HTML] ... congressional elections, by which act twenty-two congressional districts were created, in some respects ...

  2. McCUTCHEON v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMM’N

    Syllabus McCUTCHEON v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMM’N () 893 F. Supp. 2d 133, reversed and remanded. ... Syllabus McC UTCHEON et al. v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION appeal from the united states district court for ... Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett, 564 U. S.___,___. The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA), as ...

  3. FEDERAL ELECTION COMM N v. WISCONSIN RIGHT TOLIFE, INC.

    Syllabus FEDERAL ELECTION COMM’N v. WISCONSIN RIGHT TOLIFE, INC. (Nos. 06-969 and 06-970) ... [HTML] [PDF] Concurrence, Scalia [HTML] [PDF] Dissent, Souter [HTML] [PDF] FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION v. ... a federal primary election or 60 days of a federal general election in the jurisdiction where that candidate ...

  4. Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections

    383 U.S. 663 Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections (No. 48) Argued: January 25-26, 1966 Decided: ... vote in federal elections is conferred by Art. I, § 2, of the Constitution (United States v. Classic, ... 313 U.S. 299, 314-315), the right to vote in state elections is nowhere expressly mentioned. It is ...

  5. Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections

    383 U.S. 663 Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections (No. 48) Argued: January 25-26, 1966 Decided: ... vote in federal elections is conferred by Art. I, § 2, of the Constitution (United States v. Classic, ... 313 U.S. 299, 314-315), the right to vote in state elections is nowhere expressly mentioned. It is ...

  6. BETHUNE-HILL v. VIRGINIA STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS

    Syllabus BETHUNE-HILL v. VIRGINIA STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS () 141 F. Supp. 3d 505, affirmed in part, ... COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus BETHUNE-HILL et al. v. VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al. on ... avoid diminishing the ability of black voters to elect their preferred candidates, which at the time ...

  7. Alan B. BURDICK, Petitioner v. Morris TAKUSHI, Director of Elections of Hawaii, et al.

    Director of Elections of Hawaii, et al. No. 91-535. Argued: March 24, 1992. Decided: June 8, 1992. opinion, ... Appeals reversed, holding that the prohibition, taken as part of the State's comprehensive election ... A court considering a state election law challenge must weigh the character and magnitude of the asserted ...

  8. Annie E. HARPER et al., appellants, v. VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al.

    ELECTIONS et al. No. 48. Decided: December 13, 1965 Solicitor General Marshall, for movant. The motion of ...

  9. ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Appellant, v. SOCIALIST WORKERS PARTY et al.

    440 U.S. 173 (99 S.Ct. 983, 59 L.Ed.2d 230) ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Appellant, v. ... Under the Illinois Election Code, new political parties and independent candidates must obtain the ... signatures of 25,000 qualified voters in order to appear on the ballot in statewide elections. However, the ...

  10. FEDERAL ELECTION COMM N v. BEAUMONT

    Syllabus FEDERAL ELECTION COMM’N v. BEAUMONT (No. 02-403) 278 F. 3d 261, reversed. ... [PDF] FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION v. BEAUMONT et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals ... certain federal elections, 2 U. S. C. §441b(a), but not from establishing, administering, and soliciting ...

Pages