A citizen of Nigeria sought protection for fear that she would be subject to female genital mutilation. The Refugee Review Tribunal found that female genital mutilation constitutes serious harm amounting to persecution, but that on the facts, there was no real risk that the applicant would be subjected to female genital mutilation.
- Geographical location
- Keywords
Year
2004
Institution
Federal Court of Australia
External URL
SVFB v. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
- Type
- Jurisdiction
Avon Center work product
ID
907