skip navigation
search

550 U. S. ____ (2007) (No. 05-1508)
437 F. 3d 1289, affirmed.
Syllabus

Opinion
[Breyer]
Concurrence
[Stevens]
Concurrence
[Kennedy]
Dissent
[Scalia]
Dissent
[Souter]
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version

550 U. S. ____ (2007)

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

ZUNI PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 89, et al., PETITIONERS v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCA-
TION et al.

on writ of certiorari to the united states court ofappeals for the tenth circuit


[April 17, 2007]

    Justice Souter, dissenting.

    I agree with the Court that Congress probably intended, or at least understood, that the Secretary would continue to follow the methodology devised prior to passage of the current statute in 1994, see ante, at 7–8. But for reasons set out in Justice Scalia’s dissent, I find the statutory language unambiguous and inapt to authorize that methodology, and I therefore join Part I of his dissenting opinion.