42 USC § 10367 - Water data enhancement by United States Geological Survey
(a)
National streamflow information program
(1)
In general
The Secretary, in consultation with the Advisory Committee and the Panel and consistent with this section, shall proceed with implementation of the national streamflow information program, as reviewed by the National Research Council in 2004.
(2)
Requirements
In conducting the national streamflow information program, the Secretary shall—
(B)
provide for a better understanding of hydrologic extremes (including floods and droughts) through the conduct of intensive data collection activities during and following hydrologic extremes;
(4)
Network enhancement
(5)
Federal share
The Federal share of the national streamgaging network established pursuant to this subsection shall be 100 percent of the cost of carrying out the national streamgaging network.
(b)
National groundwater resources monitoring
(1)
In general
The Secretary shall develop a systematic groundwater monitoring program for each major aquifer system located in the United States.
(2)
Program elements
In developing the monitoring program described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—
(A)
establish appropriate criteria for monitoring wells to ensure the acquisition of long-term, high-quality data sets, including, to the maximum extent possible, the inclusion of real-time instrumentation and reporting;
(B)
in coordination with the Advisory Committee and State and local water resource agencies—
(C)
prior to initiating any specific monitoring activities within a State after March 30, 2009, consult and coordinate with the applicable State water resource agency with jurisdiction over the aquifer that is the subject of the monitoring activities, and comply with all applicable laws (including regulations) of the State.
(3)
Program objectives
In carrying out the monitoring program described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—
(A)
provide data that is necessary for the improvement of understanding with respect to surface water and groundwater interactions;
(5)
Federal share
The Federal share of the monitoring program described in paragraph (1) may be 100 percent of the cost of carrying out the monitoring program.
(6)
Priority
In selecting monitoring activities consistent with the monitoring program described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall give priority to those activities for which a State or local governmental entity agrees to provide for a substantial share of the cost of establishing or operating a monitoring well or other measuring device to carry out a monitoring activity.
(c)
Brackish groundwater assessment
(1)
Study
The Secretary, in consultation with State and local water resource agencies, shall conduct a study of available data and other relevant information—
(2)
Report
Not later than 2 years after March 30, 2009, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that includes—
(A)
a description of each—
(i)
significant brackish aquifer that is located in the United States (including 1 or more maps of each significant brackish aquifer that is located in the United States);
(d)
Improved water estimation, measurement, and monitoring technologies
(1)
Authority of Secretary
The Secretary may provide grants on a nonreimbursable basis to appropriate entities with expertise in water resource data acquisition and reporting, including Federal agencies, the Water Resources Research Institutes and other academic institutions, and private entities, to—
(2)
Priority
In providing grants to appropriate entities under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall give priority to appropriate entities that propose the development of new methods and technologies for—
(3)
Partnerships
In recognition of the value of collaboration to foster innovation and enhance research and development efforts, the Secretary shall encourage partnerships, including public-private partnerships, between and among Federal agencies, academic institutions, and private entities to promote the objectives described in paragraph (1).
(a)
National streamflow information program
(1)
In general
The Secretary, in consultation with the Advisory Committee and the Panel and consistent with this section, shall proceed with implementation of the national streamflow information program, as reviewed by the National Research Council in 2004.
(2)
Requirements
In conducting the national streamflow information program, the Secretary shall—
(B)
provide for a better understanding of hydrologic extremes (including floods and droughts) through the conduct of intensive data collection activities during and following hydrologic extremes;
(4)
Network enhancement
(5)
Federal share
The Federal share of the national streamgaging network established pursuant to this subsection shall be 100 percent of the cost of carrying out the national streamgaging network.
(b)
National groundwater resources monitoring
(1)
In general
The Secretary shall develop a systematic groundwater monitoring program for each major aquifer system located in the United States.
(2)
Program elements
In developing the monitoring program described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—
(A)
establish appropriate criteria for monitoring wells to ensure the acquisition of long-term, high-quality data sets, including, to the maximum extent possible, the inclusion of real-time instrumentation and reporting;
(B)
in coordination with the Advisory Committee and State and local water resource agencies—
(C)
prior to initiating any specific monitoring activities within a State after March 30, 2009, consult and coordinate with the applicable State water resource agency with jurisdiction over the aquifer that is the subject of the monitoring activities, and comply with all applicable laws (including regulations) of the State.
(3)
Program objectives
In carrying out the monitoring program described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—
(A)
provide data that is necessary for the improvement of understanding with respect to surface water and groundwater interactions;
(5)
Federal share
The Federal share of the monitoring program described in paragraph (1) may be 100 percent of the cost of carrying out the monitoring program.
(6)
Priority
In selecting monitoring activities consistent with the monitoring program described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall give priority to those activities for which a State or local governmental entity agrees to provide for a substantial share of the cost of establishing or operating a monitoring well or other measuring device to carry out a monitoring activity.
(c)
Brackish groundwater assessment
(1)
Study
The Secretary, in consultation with State and local water resource agencies, shall conduct a study of available data and other relevant information—
(2)
Report
Not later than 2 years after March 30, 2009, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that includes—
(A)
a description of each—
(i)
significant brackish aquifer that is located in the United States (including 1 or more maps of each significant brackish aquifer that is located in the United States);
(d)
Improved water estimation, measurement, and monitoring technologies
(1)
Authority of Secretary
The Secretary may provide grants on a nonreimbursable basis to appropriate entities with expertise in water resource data acquisition and reporting, including Federal agencies, the Water Resources Research Institutes and other academic institutions, and private entities, to—
(2)
Priority
In providing grants to appropriate entities under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall give priority to appropriate entities that propose the development of new methods and technologies for—
(3)
Partnerships
In recognition of the value of collaboration to foster innovation and enhance research and development efforts, the Secretary shall encourage partnerships, including public-private partnerships, between and among Federal agencies, academic institutions, and private entities to promote the objectives described in paragraph (1).
Source
(Pub. L. 111–11, title IX, § 9507,Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1339.)
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Friday, May 3, 2013
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel.
| 42 USC | Description of Change | Session Year | Public Law | Statutes at Large |
|---|
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.