NY Court of Appeals
liibulletin-ny

LII

Collection home Search Tell me more  

LII home

Special project: Internet Law
  Copyright Law
    • Introduction
    • Issues & short answers
    • Previous state of the law
    • Discussion
    • Future of the Law
    • Authorities Cited
 

 
Surfers and Beach Owners: The Application of Copyright Law to the Internet

II. Issues and Short Answers

A. The DMCA

1. Issue: What is the impact of the DMCA on copyright's application to Internet activity?

Short Answer: The three main aspects of the DMCA significant to an understanding of its current and potential application to the regulation of Internet activity are: (1) anti-circumvention legislation; (2) anti-trafficking provisions; and (3) limitations on online copyright infringement liability.

Anti-circumvention legislation prohibits evasion of technological measures used to protect copyrighted works and tampering with copyright management information.6 The anti-trafficking provisions ban manufacture of, or trafficking in, any technology that circumvents access control or copy control measures.7 The Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act ("OCILLA") provides a safe harbor which significantly limits the liability of ISPs for copyright infringement.8

B. Judicial Application of Copyright Law to Internet Activity

1.Issue: When an Internet user employs a segment of text or a graphical item to serve as a cross-reference between his document and a document protected by copyright, does the action constitute copyright infringement?

Short Answer: Linking occurs when a segment of text or a graphical item serves as a cross-reference between parts of a hypertext document or between files or hypertext documents.9

A link that points to a site containing infringing material may cause further infringing reproductions, public performances, public distributions and public displays10 to occur when the Internet user reaches that site and the infringing material is downloaded and/or performed and displayed to the user following the link. Even if the material on the destination site is not infringing, the reproductions, distributions, and displays that occur may not be authorized, given that the link is often established without explicit permission from the owner of the material.11

Case law suggests the possibility that permission from copyright holders may in some cases be required for linking. However, linking itself cannot constitute direct infringement if the server of the linking website does not copy or otherwise process the content of the linked-to site.

2. Issue: When an Internet user pulls in an image or text from another web page into the current document for display does the action constitute copyright infringement?

Short Answer: Framing allows website creators to incorporate content on remote sites wholesale into their own offerings, incorporating that content into their own web pages in the user's browserwithout ever terminating the connection to the original pages.12 Framing may be viewed as causing an infringement on the right of reproduction, display or performance, or may constitute the creation of an unauthorized derivative work.13

Courts have held that a copyright infringement has occurred in cases that involve framing, on a variety of grounds.

3. Issue: When an Internet user shares digital music files over the Internet by participating in a file sharing system, does the sharing constitute copyright infringement for the owner of the file sharing system?

Short Answer: Many suits have arisen recently regarding the liability of websites that index, post links to, or actually serve, music content. Publishing companies and their associations have filed a variety of suits against alleged infringers for unauthorized copying of commercial compact discs.

The best-known of these suits is A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001).14 Napster is a file sharing system which allowed the transmission of MP3 files15 between and among users. While discussing the relevant provisions of the DMCA and its safe harbors for ISPs, the court held that Napster could be liable for contributory and vicarious infringement.

next

Copyright

About us

Send email