| Syllabus | Opinion [ OConnor ] | Concurrence [ Souter ] | Concurrence [ Opinion of Stevens ] | Dissent [ Breyer ] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version | HTML version PDF version |
[June 18, 2001]
Justice Souter, concurring.
Although I join the Courts opinion in full, I have joined Justice Stevenss separate opinion pointing out that nothing bars a district court from retaining jurisdiction pending complete exhaustion of state remedies, and that a claim for equitable tolling could present a serious issue on facts different from those before us.