STATE FARM MUT. AUTOMOBILE INS. CO.V. CAMPBELL (01-1289)
___ P.3d ___, reversed and remanded.
Syllabus
Opinion
[ Kennedy ]		Dissent
[ Scalia ]		Dissent
[ Thomas ]		Dissent
[ Ginsburg ]
HTML version
PDF version		HTML version
PDF version		HTML version
PDF version		HTML version
PDF version		HTML version
PDF version

538 U.S. ____ (2003)

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 01—1289

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
COMPANY, PETITIONER v. INEZ PREECE CAMPBELL and MATTHEW C. BARNECK, special administrator and personal representative of the ESTATE OF CURTIS B. CAMPBELL

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF UTAH

[April 7, 2003]

Justice Thomas, dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment below because “I continue to believe that the Constitution does not constrain the size of punitive damages awards.” Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., 532 U.S. 424, 443 (2001) (Thomas, J., concurring) (citing BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559, 599 (1996) (Scalia, J., joined by Thomas, J., dissenting)). Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.