Syllabus
|
Opinion
[Souter] |
Concurrence
[Stevens] |
Concurrence
[Roberts] |
Concurrence
[Scalia] |
Concurrence
[Thomas] |
Dissent
[Kennedy] |
Dissent
[Alito] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version |
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF KENTUCKY, et al.,
PETITIONERS v. GEORGE W. DAVIS et ux.
on writ of certiorari to the court of appeals ofkentucky
[May 19, 2008]
Justice Alito, dissenting.
I proceed in this case, as I did in United Haulers Assn., Inc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority, 550 U. S. ___, ___ (2007) (dissenting opinion), on the assumption that the Court’s established dormant Commerce Clause precedents should be followed, and on that assumption, I entirely agree with and join Justice Kennedy’s dissent.