Syllabus
|
Opinion
[Scalia] |
Concurrence
[Souter] |
---|---|---|
HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version |
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v. NAVAJO NATION
on writ of certiorari to the united states court ofappeals for the federal circuit
[April 6, 2009]
Justice Souter, with whom Justice Stevens joins, concurring.
I am not through regretting that my position in United States v. Navajo Nation, 537 U. S. 488, 514–521 (2003) (dissenting opinion), did not carry the day. But it did not, and I agree that the precedent of that case calls for the result reached here.