| Syllabus
|
Opinion
[Ginsburg] |
Concurrence
[Scalia] |
Concurrence
[Kennedy] |
|---|---|---|---|
| HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version |
CONRAD M. BLACK, JOHN A. BOULTBEE,
and
MARK
S. KIPNIS, PETITIONERS
v.
UNITED STATES
Justice Kennedy , concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.
I join the Court’s opinion except for those parts stating that 18 U. S. C. §1346 “criminalizes only schemes to defraud that involve bribes or kickbacks.” Ante , at 5. For the reasons set forth in Justice Scalia’ s separate opinion in Skilling v. United States , ante , p. ___ (opinion concurring in part and concurring in judgment), §1346 is unconstitutionally vague. To convict a defendant based on an honest-services-fraud theory, even one limited to bribes or kickbacks, would violate his or her rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment .