Syllabus
|
Opinion
[Kagan] |
Concurrence
[Scalia] |
Concurrence
[Sotomayor] |
Dissent
[Kennedy] |
---|---|---|---|---|
HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version |
BOB CAMRETA, PETITIONER
09–1454 v.
SARAH GREENE, personally and as next friend of S. G., a minor, and K. G., a minor
JAMES ALFORD, DEPUTY SHERIFF, DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, PETITIONER
09–1478 v.
SARAH GREENE, personally and as next friend of S. G., a minor, and K. G., a minor
on writs of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit
Justice Scalia , concurring.
I join the Court’s opinion, which reasonably applies our precedents, strange though they may be. The alternative solution, as Justice Kennedy suggests, see post , at 13 (dissenting opinion), is to end the extraordinary practice of ruling upon constitutional questions unnecessarily when the defendant possesses qualified immunity. See Saucier v. Katz , 533 U. S. 194 (2001) . The parties have not asked us to adopt that approach, but I would be willing to consider it in an appropriate case.