CAMRETA v. GREENE ( Nos. 09-1454 and 09-1478 )
588 F. 3d 1011, vacated in part and remanded.
Syllabus

Opinion
[Kagan]
Concurrence
[Scalia]
Concurrence
[Sotomayor]
Dissent
[Kennedy]
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version

563 U. S. ____ (2011)

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

BOB CAMRETA, PETITIONER

09–1454 v.

SARAH GREENE, personally and as next friend of S. G., a minor, and K. G., a minor

JAMES ALFORD, DEPUTY SHERIFF, DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, PETITIONER

09–1478 v.

SARAH GREENE, personally and as next friend of S. G., a minor, and K. G., a minor

on writs of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit


[May 26, 2011]

Justice Scalia , concurring.

I join the Court’s opinion, which reasonably applies our precedents, strange though they may be. The alternative solution, as Justice Kennedy suggests, see post , at 13 (dissenting opinion), is to end the extraordinary practice of ruling upon constitutional questions unnecessarily when the defendant possesses qualified immunity. See Saucier v. Katz , 533 U. S. 194 (2001) . The parties have not asked us to adopt that approach, but I would be willing to consider it in an appropriate case.