| Dissent [ Rehnquist ] | Dissent [ O'Connor ] | Opinion [ Kennedy ] | Concurrence [ Scalia ] | Syllabus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTML version WordPerfect version | HTML version WordPerfect version | HTML version WordPerfect version | HTML version WordPerfect version | HTML version WordPerfect version |
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No.
[
Justice
I am willing to accept these consequences because I see no alternative within the constraints of our "active supervision" doctrine, which has not been challenged here; and because I am skeptical about the Parker v. Brown exemption for state programmed private collusion in the first place.