Federal Trade Comm'n v. Ticor Title Ins. (91-72), 504 U.S. 621 (1992).
Dissent
[ Rehnquist ]		Dissent
[ O'Connor ]		Opinion
[ Kennedy ]		Concurrence
[ Scalia ]		Syllabus
HTML version
WordPerfect version		HTML version
WordPerfect version		HTML version
WordPerfect version		HTML version
WordPerfect version		HTML version
WordPerfect version

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 91-72

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, PETITIONER v. TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the third circuit

[June 12, 1992]

Justice Scalia , concurring.

I am willing to accept these consequences because I see no alternative within the constraints of our "active supervision" doctrine, which has not been challenged here; and because I am skeptical about the Parker v. Brown exemption for state programmed private collusion in the first place.