SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO. V. ALABAMA

SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO. V. ALABAMA (97-2045)
711 So. 2d 1005, reversed and remanded.
Syllabus	Opinion [ Breyer ]	Concurrence [ O'Connor ]	Concurrence [ Thomas ]
HTML version PDF version	HTML version PDF version	HTML version PDF version	HTML version PDF version

Thomas, J., concurring

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 97—2045

SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,
et al., PETITIONERS v. ALABAMA et al.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF ALABAMA

[March 23, 1999]

Justice Thomas, concurring.

I join the opinion of the Court. I agree that it would be inappropriate to take up the State’s invitation to reconsider our negative Commerce Clause doctrine in this case because “the State did not make clear it intended to make this argument until it filed its brief on the merits.” Ante, at 10.

SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,et al., PETITIONERS v. ALABAMA et al.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURTOF ALABAMA

SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,
et al., PETITIONERS v. ALABAMA et al.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF ALABAMA