CHRISTENSEN V. HARRIS COUNTY (98-1167)
158 F.3d 241, affirmed.
Syllabus
Opinion
[ Thomas ]		Concurrence
[ Souter ]		Concurrence
[ Opinion of Scalia ]		Dissent
[ Stevens ]		Dissent
[ Breyer ]
HTML version
PDF version		HTML version
PDF version		HTML version
PDF version		HTML version
PDF version		HTML version
PDF version		HTML version
PDF version

Souter, J., concurring

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 98—1167

EDWARD CHRISTENSEN, et al., PETITIONERS v. HARRIS COUNTY et al.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

[May 1, 2000]

Justice Souter, concurring.

I join the opinion of the Court on the assumption that it does not foreclose a reading of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that allows the Secretary of Labor to issue regulations limiting forced use.