(08–1034)
Dissent
[Stevens]
Dissent
[Ginsburg]
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version

556 U. S. ____ (2009)

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

CSX TRANSP., INC. v. THURSTON
HENSLEY

on petition for writ of certiorari to the court ofappeals of tennessee, eastern division


No. 08–1034. Decided June 1, 2009

Justice Ginsburg, dissenting.

The Court’s opinion in Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Ayers, 538 U. S. 135 (2003) , would support this plain and simple instruction: “It is incumbent upon [the plaintiff] to prove that his alleged fear [of cancer] is genuine and serious,” id., at 157. The defense-oriented instructions requested, however, were far more elaborate, compare ante, at 2 (per curiam), withApp. to Pet. for Cert. 70a–71a, and the trial court rightly refused to give them. Nothing in Ayers required the court to deliver, on its own initiative, a fitting substitute. I would therefore deny the petition for certiorari and dissent from the Court’s summary reversal.