| Olmstead v. United States
()
100 U.S. 1
19 F. (2d) 842, 848, 850, affirmed. |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syllabus
| Opinion
[ Taft ] | Separate
[ Holmes ] | Dissent
[ Brandeis ] | Dissent
[ Butler ] | Dissent
[ Stone ] |
| HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version |
Olmstead v. United States
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MR. JUSTICE STONE, dissenting.
I concur in the opinions of MR. JUSTICE HOLMES and MR. JUSTICE BRANDEIS. I agree also with that of MR. JUSTICE BUTLER so far as it deals with the merits. The effect of the order granting certiorari was to limit the argument to a single question, but I do not understand that it restrains the Court from a consideration of any question which we find to be presented by the record, for, under Jud.Code, § 240(a), this Court determines a case here on certiorari "with the same power and authority, and with like effect, as if the cause had been brought [here] by unrestricted writ of error or appeal."




