Source
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 961; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 106,63 Stat. 104; Pub. L. 98–209, § 10(b),Dec. 6, 1983, 97 Stat. 1406; Pub. L. 100–352, § 5(b),June 27, 1988, 102 Stat. 663; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title IX, § 924(d)(1)(C),Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2832.)
Historical and Revision Notes
1948 Act
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 47,
47a,
349a,
350,
380,
380a, section
29 of title 15, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Commerce and Trade, and section
45 of title
49, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Transportation (Feb. 11, 1903, ch. 544, § 2,
32 Stat. 1167; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§ 210,
266,
291,
36 Stat. 1150, 1162, 1167; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 160,
37 Stat. 1013; Oct. 22, 1913, ch. 32,
38 Stat. 220; Sept. 6, 1916, ch. 448, § 6,
39 Stat. 727; Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, §§ 1,
8 (a, b, d),
43 Stat. 938, 940; Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, § 1,
45 Stat. 54; June 7, 1934, ch. 426,
48 Stat. 936; Aug. 24, 1937, ch. 754, §§ 2,
3,
50 Stat. 752; June 9, 1944, ch. 239,
58 Stat. 272).
Section consolidates section
350 of title
28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with those portions of sections 47, 47a, 349a, 380, and 380a, of said title
28, section
29, of title 15, U.S.C., 1940 ed., and section
45 of title
49, U.S.C., 1940 ed., respective time for taking direct appeal. (For disposition of other provisions of said sections, see Distribution Table.)
Subsection (a) of the revised section is derived from sections
349a and
380a of title
28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. The phrase “under rules prescribed by the Supreme Court” was substituted for the phrase “under such rules as may be prescribed by the proper courts” which appeared in both such sections. The Supreme Court by its revised rules
10–13 has made adequate provision for filing record and docketing case. (See Revised Rules of the Supreme Court following section
354 of title
28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.)
Subsection (b) is in accord with sections
47 and
47a of title
28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., and section
29 of title
15, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Commerce and Trade, and section
45 of title
49, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Transportation.
Subsection (c), with respect to the time for taking other appeals or petitioning for a writ of certiorari, substitutes, as more specific, the words “ninety days” for the words “three months” contained in section
350 of title
28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. The provision in said section
350 for allowance of additional time was retained, notwithstanding the language of the Supreme Court in Comm’r v. Bedford’s Estate, 1945, 65 S.Ct. 1157, 1159, 325 U.S. 283, 89 L.Ed. 1611, to the effect that the 3 months’ period is “more than ample * * * to determine whether to seek further review”.
In subsection (c), words “in a civil action, suit, or proceeding” were added because section
350 of title
28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was superseded as to criminal cases by Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule
39(a)(2), (b)(2).
Words “or the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia” in section
350 of title
28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were omitted as covered by “court of appeals” in subsection (d) of this revised section.
Words in section
350 of title
28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., “excepting that writs of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands may be granted where application therefor is made within six months”, were omitted as obsolete, in view of the independence of the Philippines recognized by section
1240 of title
48, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Territories and Insular Possessions.
Subsection (e) relates only to supersedeas or stay of execution of judgments sought to be reviewed in the Supreme Court on writ of certiorari. Supersedeas or stay of proceedings taken to the Supreme Court by appeal from courts of appeals, or direct appeals from a district court or three-judge courts, is governed by Rule 62 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.
1949 Act
This section clarifies the meaning of subsection (c) ofsection
2101 of title 28, U.S.C. At present, such subsection, after the words, “ninety days after entry of such judgment or decree”, reads, “unless, upon application for writ of certiorari, for good cause, the Supreme Court or a justice thereof allows an additional time not exceeding sixty days.”
The new subsection (d) ofsection
2101 supplies an omission in revised title 28, U.S.C., and confirms the authority of the Supreme Court to regulate the time for seeking review of State criminal cases.
The other amendment merely renumbers subsections (d) and (e) of such section
2101 assubsections (e) and (f), respectively.
Amendments
1994—Subsec. (g).
Pub. L. 103–337substituted “Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces” for “Court of Military Appeals”.
1988—Subsec. (a).
Pub. L. 100–352substituted “section
1253” for “sections
1252,
1253, and
2282”.
1983—Subsec. (g).
Pub. L. 98–209added subsec. (g).
1949—Subsec. (c). Act May 24, 1949, § 106(a), clarified the allowance of an additional 60 days in which to apply for a writ of certiorari.
Subsecs. (d) to (f). Act May 24, 1949, § 106(b), added subsec. (d) and redesignated former subsecs. (d) and (e) as (e) and (f), respectively.
Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 100–352effective ninety days after June 27, 1988, except that such amendment not to apply to cases pending in Supreme Court on such effective date or affect right to review or manner of reviewing judgment or decree of court which was entered before such effective date, see section 7 of
Pub. L. 100–352, set out as a note under section
1254 of this title.
Effective Date of 1983 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 98–209effective on first day of eighth calendar month beginning after Dec. 6, 1983, see section 12(a)(1) of
Pub. L. 98–209, set out as a note under section
801 of Title
10, Armed Forces.