Source
(Pub. L. 102–285, § 2,May 18, 1992, 106 Stat. 166; Pub. L. 106–148, § 2,Dec. 9, 1999, 113 Stat. 1719; Pub. L. 111–11, title XI, § 11001(a), (b),Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1414.)
References in Text
Sections
31a to
31h of this title, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original “this Act”, meaning
Pub. L. 102–285, known as the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992, which is classified principally to sections
31a to
31h of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note below and Tables.
Amendments
2009—Subsec. (a)(1).
Pub. L. 111–11, § 11001(a)(1), added par. (1) and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: “during the past 2 decades, the production of geologic maps has been drastically curtailed;”.
Subsec. (a)(2)(C).
Pub. L. 111–11, § 11001(a)(2)(A), inserted “homeland and” after “planning for”.
Subsec. (a)(2)(E).
Pub. L. 111–11, § 11001(a)(2)(B), substituted “identifying” for “predicting”.
Subsec. (a)(2)(J), (K).
Pub. L. 111–11, § 11001(a)(2)(C)–(E), added subpar. (J) and redesignated former subpar. (J) as (K).
Subsec. (a)(9).
Pub. L. 111–11, § 11001(a)(3), substituted “available” for “important”.
Subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 111–11, § 11001(b), inserted “and management” before period at end.
1999—Subsec. (a)(8) to (10).
Pub. L. 106–148added pars. (8) and (9) and redesignated former par. (8) as (10) and inserted “of surficial and bedrock deposits” after “geologic mapping”.
Short Title of 1999 Amendment
Pub. L. 106–148, § 1,Dec. 9, 1999,
113 Stat. 1719, provided that: “This Act [enacting sections
31e,
31g and
31h of this title, amending sections
31a to
31d and
31f of this title, and repealing former sections
31e,
31g, and
31h of this title] may be cited as the ‘National Geologic Mapping Reauthorization Act of 1999’.”
Short Title of 1997 Amendment
Pub. L. 105–36, § 1,Aug. 5, 1997,
111 Stat. 1107, provided that: “This Act [amending sections
31b to
31h of this title and enacting provisions set out as a note under this section] may be cited as the ‘National Geologic Mapping Reauthorization Act of 1997’.”
Short Title
Section 1 of
Pub. L. 102–285provided that: “This Act [enacting this section and sections
31b to
31h of this title, amending sections
1457,
1457a, and
1782 of this title, sections
450ii–3,
665,
1133, and
3151 of Title
16, Conservation, section
262k of Title
22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse, section
1677 of Title
25, Indians, sections
1,
1a,
2,
3,
4,
4c,
4d,
5,
6,
7,
8,
411,
412,
804,
812,
871,
878,
1224,
1229,
1232,
1311,
1315, and
1604 of Title
30, Mineral Lands and Mining, and sections
5814 and
6505 of Title
42, The Public Health and Welfare, enacting provisions set out as notes under section
31 of this title and section
1 of Title
30, and amending provisions set out as a note under section
1231 of Title
30] may be cited as the ‘National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992’.”
Findings
Pub. L. 105–36, § 2,Aug. 5, 1997,
111 Stat. 1107, provided that: “Congress finds that—
“(1) in enacting the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992 (
43 U.S.C.
31a et seq.), Congress found, among other things, that—
“(A) during the 2 decades preceding enactment of that Act, the production of geologic maps had been drastically curtailed;
“(B) geologic maps are the primary data base for virtually all applied and basic earth-science investigations;
“(C) Federal agencies, State and local governments, private industry, and the general public depend on the information provided by geologic maps to determine the extent of potential environmental damage before embarking on projects that could lead to preventable, costly environmental problems or litigation;
“(D) the lack of proper geologic maps has led to the poor design of such structures as dams and waste-disposal facilities;
“(E) geologic maps have proven indispensable in the search for needed fossil fuel and mineral resources; and
“(F) a comprehensive nationwide program of geologic mapping is required in order to systematically build the Nation’s geologic-map data base at a pace that responds to increasing demand;
“(2) the geologic mapping program called for by that Act has not been fully implemented; and
“(3) it is time for this important program to be fully implemented.”