Source
(Added Pub. L. 95–454, title VI, § 601(a),Oct. 13, 1978, 92 Stat. 1185; amended Pub. L. 96–54, § 2(a)(21),Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 382; Pub. L. 101–474, § 5(g),Oct. 30, 1990, 104 Stat. 1100; Pub. L. 103–359, title V, § 501(f),Oct. 14, 1994, 108 Stat. 3429; Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title XI, § 1122(a)(1),Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2687; Pub. L. 108–271, § 8(b),July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814; Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title IX, § 931(a)(1),Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4575.)
Amendments
2008—Subsec. (a)(1)(B).
Pub. L. 110–417substituted “National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency” for “National Imagery and Mapping Agency”.
2004—Subsec. (a)(1)(C).
Pub. L. 108–271substituted “Government Accountability Office” for “General Accounting Office”.
1996—Subsec. (a)(1)(B).
Pub. L. 104–201substituted “National Imagery and Mapping Agency” for “Central Imagery Office”.
1994—Subsec. (a)(1)(B).
Pub. L. 103–359inserted “the Central Imagery Office,” after “Defense Intelligence Agency,”.
1990—Subsec. (a)(1).
Pub. L. 101–474struck out “, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts,” after “means an Executive agency”.
1979—Subsec. (b).
Pub. L. 96–54substituted “chapter” for “subchapter” and “
28 U.S.C.
509” for “
5 U.S.C.
5108”.
Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 104–201effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1124 of
Pub. L. 104–201, set out as a note under section
193 of Title
10, Armed Forces.
Effective Date of 1979 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 96–54effective July 12, 1979, see section 2(b) of
Pub. L. 96–54, set out as a note under section
305 of this title.
Effective Date
Chapter effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of
Pub. L. 95–454, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section
1101 of this title.
Design Elements of Pay-for-Performance Systems in Demonstration Projects
Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title XI, § 1126,Nov. 24, 2003,
117 Stat. 1640, provided that: “A pay-for-performance system may not be initiated under chapter
47 of title
5, United States Code, after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 24, 2003], unless it incorporates the following elements:
“(1) Adherence to merit principles set forth in section 2301 of such title.
“(2) A fair, credible, and transparent employee performance appraisal system.
“(3) A link between elements of the pay-for-performance system, the employee performance appraisal system, and the agency’s strategic plan.
“(4) A means for ensuring employee involvement in the design and implementation of the system.
“(5) Adequate training and retraining for supervisors, managers, and employees in the implementation and operation of the pay-for-performance system.
“(6) A process for ensuring ongoing performance feedback and dialogue between supervisors, managers, and employees throughout the appraisal period, and setting timetables for review.
“(7) Effective safeguards to ensure that the management of the system is fair and equitable and based on employee performance.
“(8) A means for ensuring that adequate agency resources are allocated for the design, implementation, and administration of the pay-for-performance system.”