Source
(Added Pub. L. 96–481, title II, § 203(a)(1), (c),Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2325, 2327; revived and amended Pub. L. 99–80, §§ 1,
6,Aug. 5, 1985, 99 Stat. 183, 186; Pub. L. 99–509, title VI, § 6103(c),Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1948; Pub. L. 99–514, § 2,Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095; Pub. L. 100–647, title VI, § 6239(b),Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3746; Pub. L. 103–141, § 4(b),Nov. 16, 1993, 107 Stat. 1489; Pub. L. 104–121, title II, § 231,Mar. 29, 1996, 110 Stat. 862; Pub. L. 111–350, § 5(a)(1),Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3841.)
References in Text
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, referred to in subsec. (b)(1)(C)(iv), is
Pub. L. 103–141, Nov. 16, 1993,
107 Stat. 1488, which is classified principally to chapter 21B (§ 2000bb et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section
2000bb of Title
42 and Tables.
Section 7430 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in subsec. (f), is classified to section
7430 of Title
26, Internal Revenue Code.
Amendments
2011—Subsec. (b)(1)(C)(ii).
Pub. L. 111–350substituted “section
7103 of title
41” for “section 6 of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (
41 U.S.C. 605)” and “section
7105 of title
41” for “section 8 of that Act (
41 U.S.C. 607)”.
1996—Subsec. (a)(4).
Pub. L. 104–121, § 231(a), added par. (4).
Subsec. (b)(1)(A)(ii).
Pub. L. 104–121, § 231(b)(1), substituted “$125” for “$75”.
Subsec. (b)(1)(B).
Pub. L. 104–121, § 231(b)(2), inserted before semicolon at end “or for purposes of subsection (a)(4), a small entity as defined in section
601”.
Subsec. (b)(1)(F).
Pub. L. 104–121, § 231(b)(3)–(5), added subpar. (F).
1993—Subsec. (b)(1)(C).
Pub. L. 103–141added cl. (iv).
1988—Subsec. (f).
Pub. L. 100–647added subsec. (f).
1986—Subsec. (b)(1)(B).
Pub. L. 99–514substituted “Internal Revenue Code of 1986” for “Internal Revenue Code of 1954”.
Subsec. (b)(1)(C)(iii).
Pub. L. 99–509added cl. (iii).
1985—Subsec. (a)(1).
Pub. L. 99–80, § 1(a)(1), (2), struck out “as a party to the proceeding” after “the position of the agency”, and inserted “Whether or not the position of the agency was substantially justified shall be determined on the basis of the administrative record, as a whole, which is made in the adversary adjudication for which fees and other expenses are sought.”
Subsec. (a)(2).
Pub. L. 99–80, § 1(b), inserted “When the United States appeals the underlying merits of an adversary adjudication, no decision on an application for fees and other expenses in connection with that adversary adjudication shall be made under this section until a final and unreviewable decision is rendered by the court on the appeal or until the underlying merits of the case have been finally determined pursuant to the appeal.”
Subsec. (a)(3).
Pub. L. 99–80, § 1(a)(3), inserted “The decision of the agency on the application for fees and other expenses shall be the final administrative decision under this section.”
Subsec. (b)(1)(B).
Pub. L. 99–80, § 1(c)(1), amended subpar. (B) generally. Prior to amendment, subpar. (B) read as follows: “ ‘party’ means a party, as defined in section
551
(3) of this title, which is an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or public or private organization other than an agency, but excludes (i) any individual whose net worth exceeded $1,000,000 at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated, and any sole owner of an unincorporated business, or any partnership, corporation, association, or organization whose net worth exceeded $5,000,000 at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated, except that an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (
26 U.S.C.
501
(c)(3)) exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Code and a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (
12 U.S.C.
1141j
(a)), may be a party regardless of the net worth of such organization or cooperative association, and (ii) any sole owner of an unincorporated business, or any partnership, corporation, association, or organization, having more than 500 employees at the time the adversary adjudication was initiated;”.
Subsec. (b)(1)(C).
Pub. L. 99–80, § 1(c)(2), designated existing provisions of subpar. (C) as cl. (i) thereof by inserting “(i)” before “an adjudication under”, added cl. (ii), and struck out “and” after the semicolon at the end.
Subsec. (b)(1)(D), (E).
Pub. L. 99–80, § 1(c)(3), substituted “; and” for the period at end of subpar. (D), and added subpar. (E).
Subsec. (c)(2).
Pub. L. 99–80, § 1(d), amended par. (2) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (2) read as follows: “A party dissatisfied with the fee determination made under subsection (a) may petition for leave to appeal to the court of the United States having jurisdiction to review the merits of the underlying decision of the agency adversary adjudication. If the court denies the petition for leave to appeal, no appeal may be taken from the denial. If the court grants the petition, it may modify the determination only if it finds that the failure to make an award, or the calculation of the amount of the award, was an abuse of discretion.”
Subsec. (d).
Pub. L. 99–80, § 1(e), amended subsec. (d) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (d) read as follows:
“(1) Fees and other expenses awarded under this section may be paid by any agency over which the party prevails from any funds made available to the agency, by appropriation or otherwise, for such purpose. If not paid by any agency, the fees and other expenses shall be paid in the same manner as the payment of final judgments is made pursuant to section
2414 of title
28, United States Code.
“(2) There is authorized to be appropriated to each agency for each of the fiscal years 1982, 1983, and 1984, such sums as may be necessary to pay fees and other expenses awarded under this section in such fiscal years.”
1980—
Pub. L. 96–481, § 203(c), which provided for the repeal of this section effective Oct. 1, 1984, was itself repealed and this section was revived by section 6 of
Pub. L. 99–80, set out as a note below.
Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Section 233 of
Pub. L. 104–121provided that: “The amendments made by sections
331 and
332 [probably means sections
231 and
232, amending this section and section
2412 of Title
28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure] shall apply to civil actions and adversary adjudications commenced on or after the date of the enactment of this subtitle [Mar. 29, 1996].”
Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 100–647applicable to proceedings commencing after Nov. 10, 1988, see section 6239(d) of
Pub. L. 100–647, set out as a note under section
7430 of Title
26, Internal Revenue Code.
Effective Date of 1986 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 99–509effective Oct. 21, 1986, and applicable to any claim or statement made, presented or submitted on or after such date, see section 6104 of
Pub. L. 99–509, set out as an Effective Date note under section
3801 of Title
31, Money and Finance.
Effective Date of 1985 Amendment
Section 7 of
Pub. L. 99–80provided that:
“(a) In General.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, the amendments made by this Act [reviving and amending this section and section
2412
(d) of Title
28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, and amending and repealing provisions set out as notes under those sections] shall apply to cases pending on or commenced on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 5, 1985].
“(b) Applicability of Amendments to Certain Prior Cases.—The amendments made by this Act shall apply to any case commenced on or after October 1, 1984, and finally disposed of before the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 5, 1985], except that in any such case, the 30-day period referred to in section
504
(a)(2) of title
5, United States Code, or section
2412
(d)(1)(B) of title
28, United States Code, as the case may be, shall be deemed to commence on the date of the enactment of this Act.
“(c) Applicability of Amendments to Prior Board of Contracts Appeals Cases.—Section
504
(b)(1)(C)(ii) of title
5, United States Code, as added by section 1(c)(2) of this Act, and section
2412
(d)(2)(E) of title
28, United States Code, as added by section 2(c)(2) of this Act, shall apply to any adversary adjudication pending on or commenced on or after October 1, 1981, in which applications for fees and other expenses were timely filed and were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”
Effective Date
Section 208 of title II of
Pub. L. 96–481, as amended by
Pub. L. 99–80, § 5,Aug. 5, 1985,
99 Stat. 186, provided that: “This title and the amendments made by this title [see Short Title note below] shall take effect of [on] October 1, 1981, and shall apply to any adversary adjudication, as defined in section
504
(b)(1)(C) of title
5, United States Code, and any civil action or adversary adjudication described in section
2412 of title
28, United States Code, which is pending on, or commenced on or after, such date. Awards may be made for fees and other expenses incurred before October 1, 1981, in any such adversary adjudication or civil action.”
Section 203(c) of
Pub. L. 96–481which provided that effective Oct. 1, 1984, this section is repealed, except that the provisions of this section shall continue to apply through final disposition of any adversary adjudication initiated before the date of repeal, was itself repealed by
Pub. L. 99–80, § 6(b)(1),Aug. 5, 1985,
99 Stat. 186.
Short Title
Section 201 of title II of
Pub. L. 96–481provided that: “This title [enacting this section, amending section
634 of Title
15, Commerce and Trade, section
2412 of Title
28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, set out in Title 28 Appendix, and section
1988 of Title
42, The Public Health and Welfare, and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section and section
2412 of Title
28] may be cited as the ‘Equal Access to Justice Act’.”
Termination of Reporting Requirements
For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of provisions in subsec. (e) of this section relating to annual report to Congress on the amount of fees and other expenses, see section 3003 of
Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section
1113 of Title
31, Money and Finance, and page
153 of House Document No.
103–7.
Termination of Administrative Conference of United States
For termination of Administrative Conference of United States, see provision of title IV of
Pub. L. 104–52, set out as a note preceding section
591 of this title.
Prohibition on Use of Energy and Water Development Appropriations To Pay Intervening Parties in Regulatory or Adjudicatory Proceedings
Pub. L. 102–377, title V, § 502,Oct. 2, 1992,
106 Stat. 1342, provided that: “None of the funds in this Act or subsequent Energy and Water Development Appropriations Acts shall be used to pay the expenses of, or otherwise compensate, parties intervening in regulatory or adjudicatory proceedings funded in such Acts.”
Revival of Previously Repealed Provisions
Section 6 of
Pub. L. 99–80provided that:
“(a) Revival of Certain Expired Provisions.—Section
504 of title
5, United States Code, and the item relating to that section in the table of sections of chapter
5 of title
5, United States Code, and subsection (d) ofsection
2412 of title 28, United States Code, shall be effective on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 5, 1985] as if they had not been repealed by sections 203(c) and 204(c) of the Equal Access to Justice Act [
Pub. L. 96–481].
“(b) Repeals.—
“(1) Section 203(c) of the Equal Access to Justice Act [which repealed this section] is hereby repealed.
“(2) Section 204(c) of the Equal Access to Justice Act [which repealed section
2412
(d) of title
28] is hereby repealed.”
Congressional Findings and Purposes
Section 202 of title II of
Pub. L. 96–481provided that:
“(a) The Congress finds that certain individuals, partnerships, corporations, and labor and other organizations may be deterred from seeking review of, or defending against, unreasonable governmental action because of the expense involved in securing the vindication of their rights in civil actions and in administrative proceedings.
“(b) The Congress further finds that because of the greater resources and expertise of the United States the standard for an award of fees against the United States should be different from the standard governing an award against a private litigant, in certain situations.
“(c) It is the purpose of this title [see Short Title note above]—
“(1) to diminish the deterrent effect of seeking review of, or defending against, governmental action by providing in specified situations an award of attorney fees, expert witness fees, and other costs against the United States; and
“(2) to insure the applicability in actions by or against the United States of the common law and statutory exceptions to the ‘American rule’ respecting the award of attorney fees.”
Limitation on Payments
Section 207 of title II of
Pub. L. 96–481, which provided that the payment of judgments, fees and other expenses in the same manner as the payment of final judgments as provided in this Act [probably should be “this title”, see Short Title note above] would be effective only to the extent and in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriation Acts, was repealed by
Pub. L. 99–80, § 4,Aug. 5, 1985,
99 Stat. 186.