Highlights of the Supreme Court's 2002-2003 Term
References for
Moseley
v. V Secret Catalog, Inc.
(March
4, 2003)
Prior Opinions
U.S.
District Court, Western District of Kentucky, Filed: Feb. 9, 2000
(WPD)
U.S.
Court of Appeals - 6th Circuit, Filed: July 30, 1999 (PDF)
Pleadings, Motions, & Arguments
Respondent's
Brief (PDF)
Supreme
Court Oral Arguments (PDF)
Amicus Briefs
In support of Moseley
Professor
Malla Pollack (PDF)
Public
Knowledge, et al. (PDF)
In support of V Secret Catalog
American
Bar Association (PDF)
American Intellectual
Property Law Association (PDF)
Best
Western International, Inc., et al. (PDF)
Intel
Corporation (PDF)
Intellectual
Property Law Professors (PDF)
Intellectual
Property Owners Association (PDF)
International
Trademark Association (PDF)
Ringling
Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., et al. (PDF)
United
States Solicitor General (PDF)
Articles & Commentary
Supreme
Court Docket Report, Appellate.net (April 2002)
Supreme
Court Rules For Sex Shop In Trademark Case, CNN.com (March 2003)
Court:
Victoria's Secret Not Hurt by Sound-Alike Shop, USATODAY.com (March
2003)
"Actual
Harm" - A Prerequisite to Relief Under the Federal Trademark Dilution
Act, RKMC.com (March 2003)
A Boost
For Cybersquatters?, InternetNews.com (March 2003)
A Trademark
Victory For The Little Guy, Jurist (March 2003)
Other References
Supreme Court
Docket
Medill
School of Journalism
Federal Trademark
Dilution Information
Trademark
Law's Little Secret: Dilution
Trademark
Dilution and the Plain Language Solution to Victoria's Secret
|
