(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, § 402,52 Stat. 1046; Mar. 16, 1950, ch. 61, § 3(d),64 Stat. 21; July 22, 1954, ch. 559, § 2,68 Stat. 511; July 9, 1956, ch. 530, 70 Stat. 512; Pub. L. 85–929, § 3(a), (b),Sept. 6, 1958, 72 Stat. 1784; Pub. L. 86–2, Mar. 17, 1959, 73 Stat. 3; Pub. L. 86–618, title I, §§ 102(a)(1), (2),
(c),July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 397, 398, 404; Pub. L. 89–477, June 29, 1966, 80 Stat. 231; Pub. L. 90–399, § 104,July 13, 1968, 82 Stat. 352; Pub. L. 99–252, § 10,Feb. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 35; Pub. L. 102–571, title I, § 107(4),Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4499; Pub. L. 103–80, § 3(i),Aug. 13, 1993, 107 Stat. 776; Pub. L. 103–417, §§ 4,
9,Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4328, 4332; Pub. L. 104–170, title IV, § 404,Aug. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 1514; Pub. L. 107–188, title III, § 309,June 12, 2002, 116 Stat. 673; Pub. L. 109–59, title VII, § 7202(a),Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1911.)
2005—Par. (i). Pub. L. 109–59
added par. (i).
2002—Par. (h). Pub. L. 107–188
added par. (h).
1996—Par. (a). Pub. L. 104–170
added subpar. (2) and struck out former subpar. (2) which read as follows: “(2)(A) if it bears or contains any added poisonous or added deleterious substance (other than one which is (i) a pesticide chemical in or on a raw agricultural commodity; (ii) a food additive; (iii) a color additive; or (iv) a new animal drug) which is unsafe within the meaning of section
of this title, or (B) if it is a raw agricultural commodity and it bears or contains a pesticide chemical which is unsafe within the meaning of section
of this title, or (C) if it is, or if it bears or contains, any food additive which is unsafe within the meaning of section
of this title: Provided, That where a pesticide chemical has been used in or on a raw agricultural commodity in conformity with an exemption granted or a tolerance prescribed under section
of this title and such raw agricultural commodity has been subjected to processing such as canning, cooking, freezing, dehydrating, or milling, the residue of such pesticide chemical remaining in or on such processed food shall, notwithstanding the provisions of sections
of this title, not be deemed unsafe if such residue in or on the raw agricultural commodity has been removed to the extent possible in good manufacturing practice and the concentration of such residue in the processed food when ready to eat is not greater than the tolerance prescribed for the raw agricultural commodity, or (D) if it is, or it bears or contains, a new animal drug (or conversion product thereof) which is unsafe within the meaning of section
of this title;”. That part of Pub. L. 104–170
which directed the substitution of “or (3) if it consists” for “(3) if it consists” was executed by making the substitution for “(3) If it consists” to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
1994—Par. (f). Pub. L. 103–417
, § 4, added par. (f).
Par. (g). Pub. L. 103–417
, § 9, added par. (g).
1993—Par. (a). Pub. L. 103–80
, § 3(i)(1), substituted a period for “; or” at end of subpar. (1) and “If it” for “if it” at beginning of par. (3). That part of Pub. L. 103–80
, § 3(i)(1), which directed the substitution of a period for “; or” at end of subpar. (2) could not be executed because “; or” did not appear.
Par. (d)(1). Pub. L. 103–80
, § 3(i)(2), substituted “, except that this subparagraph” for “: Provided, That this clause”.
Par. (d)(3). Pub. L. 103–80
, § 3(i)(3), substituted “, except that this subparagraph shall not apply” for “: Provided, That this clause shall not apply” and “, except that the Secretary may, for the purpose of avoiding or resolving uncertainty as to the application of this subparagraph” for “: And provided further, That the Secretary may, for the purpose of avoiding or resolving uncertainty as to the application of this clause”.
1992—Par. (c). Pub. L. 102–571
substituted “379e(a)” for “376(a)”.
1986—Par. (d)(2). Pub. L. 99–252
inserted provision that this clause not apply to confectionery introduced or delivered for introduction into or received or held for sale in, interstate commerce if the sale is permitted under the laws of the State in which the confectionery is intended to be offered for sale.
1968—Par. (a)(2). Pub. L. 90–399
added cls. (A)(iv) and (D).
1966—Par. (d). Pub. L. 89–477
permitted the imbedding of nonnutritive objects in confectionery foods if in the judgment of the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, as provided by regulation, the imbedding of the object is of practical functional value to the confectionery product and would not render it injurious or hazardous to health, raised to one-half of 1 per centum by volume the upper limit for the allowable use of alcohol derived solely from the use of flavoring extracts, allowed the use of safe nonnutritive substances in and on confectionery foods by reason of their use for some practical and functional purpose in the manufacture, packaging, or storage of the confectionery foods if the use of the substances does not promote deception of the consumer or otherwise result in adulteration or misbranding, authorized the Secretary to issue regulations on the use of particular nonnutritive substances, and removed reference to nonnutritive masticatory substances added to chewing gum and harmless flavoring, harmless resinous glaze not in excess of four-tenths of 1 per centum, natural gum, authorized coloring, and pectin.
1960—Par. (a). Pub. L. 86–618
, § 102(a)(1), substituted “other than one which is (i) a pesticide chemical in or on a raw agricultural commodity; (ii) a food additive; or (iii) a color additive” for “(except a pesticide chemical in or on a raw agricultural commodity and except a food additive)” in cl. (2)(A).
Par. (c). Pub. L. 86–618
, § 102(a)(2), amended par. (c) generally, substituting provisions deeming a food adulterated if it is, or it bears or contains, a color additive which is unsafe within the meaning of section
of this title for provisions which related to food that bears or contains a coal-tar color other than one from a batch that has been certified in accordance with regulations as provided by section
of this title, and struck out provisos which related to the use of color on oranges.
Par. (d). Pub. L. 86–618
, § 105(c), substituted “authorized coloring” for “harmless coloring”.
1959—Par. (c). Pub. L. 86–2
extended from Mar. 1, 1959, to May 1, 1959, the period during which par. is inapplicable to oranges which have been colored with F.D. & C. Red 32, and inserted proviso requiring Secretary to establish regulations prescribing the conditions under which Citrus Red No. 2 may be safely used in coloring certain mature oranges, and providing for separately listing and for certification of batches of such color.
1958—Par. (a). Pub. L. 85–929
, among other changes, inserted cl. (2)(C) relating to food additive unsafe within the meaning of section
of this title, and to pesticide chemical, and added cl. (7) relating to radiated food.
1956—Par. (c). Act July 9, 1956, inserted second proviso relating to coloring of oranges.
1954—Par. (a)(2). Act July 22, 1954, provided in the case of any raw agricultural commodity bearing or containing a pesticide chemical, that such commodity shall be deemed to be adulterated if such pesticide chemical is unsafe within the meaning of section
of this title.
1950—Par. (e). Act Mar. 16, 1950, added par. (e).
Effective Date of 2005 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–59
effective Oct. 1, 2005, see section 7204 ofPub. L. 109–59
, set out as a note under section
of this title.
Effective Date of 1968 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 90–399
effective on first day of thirteenth calendar month after July 13, 1968, see section 108(a) ofPub. L. 90–399
, set out as an Effective Date and Transitional Provisions note under section
of this title.
Effective Date of 1960 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 86–618
effective July 12, 1960, subject to the provisions of section 203 ofPub. L. 86–618
, see section 202 ofPub. L. 86–618
, set out as a note under section
of this title.
Effective Date of Nematocide, Plant Regulator, Defoliant, and Desiccant Amendment of 1959
Effective date of par. (a)(2) as in force prior to July 22, 1954, with respect to particular commercial use of a nematocide, plant regulator, defoliant, or desiccant in or on a raw agricultural commodity made before Jan. 1, 1958, see section 3(b) ofPub. L. 86–139
, Aug. 7, 1959, 73 Stat. 288
Effective Date of 1958 Amendment
Pub. L. 85–929
, § 6,Sept. 6, 1958, 72 Stat. 1788
, as amended by Pub. L. 87–19
, § 2,Apr. 7, 1961, 75 Stat. 42
; Pub. L. 88–625
, § 2,Oct. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 1002
, provided that:
“(a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) of this section, this Act [amending this section, sections
of this title, and section
, The Public Health and Welfare, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections
of this title] shall take effect on the date of its enactment [Sept. 6, 1958].
“(b) Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, section 3 of this Act [amending this section and section
of this title] shall take effect on the one hundred and eightieth day after the date of enactment of this Act [Sept. 6, 1958].
“(c) With respect to any particular commercial use of a food additive, if such use was made of such additive before January 1, 1958, section 3 of this Act [amending this section and section
of this title] shall take effect—
“(1) Either (A) one year after the effective date established in subsection (b) of this section, or (B) at the end of such additional period (but not later than two years from such effective date established in subsection (b)) as the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare [now Health and Human Services] may prescribe on the basis of a finding that such extension involves no undue risk to the public health and that conditions exist which necessitate the prescribing of such an additional period, or
whichever date first occurs. Whenever the Secretary has, pursuant to clause (1)(B) of this subsection, extended the effective date of section 3 of this Act [amending this section] to March 5, 1961, or has on that date a request for such extension pending before him, with respect to any such particular use of a food additive, he may, notwithstanding the parenthetical time limitation in that clause, further extend such effective date, not beyond June 30, 1964, under the authority of that clause (but subject to clause (2)) with respect to such use of the additive (or a more limited specified use or uses thereof) if, in addition to making the findings required by clause (1)(B), he finds (i) that bona fide action to determine the applicability of such section
348 of this title] to such use or uses, or to develop the scientific data necessary for action under such section, was commenced by an interested person before March 6, 1960, and was thereafter pursued with reasonable diligence, and (ii) that in the Secretary’s judgment such extension is consistent with the objective of carrying to completion in good faith, as soon as reasonably practicable, the scientific investigations necessary as a basis for action under such section
348 of this title]: Provided, That if the Secretary has, pursuant to this sentence, granted an extension to June 30, 1964, he may, upon making the findings required by clause (1)(B) of this subsection and clauses (i) and (ii) of this sentence, further extend such effective date, but not beyond December 31, 1965. The Secretary may at any time terminate an extension so granted if he finds that it should not have been granted, or that by reason of a change in circumstances the basis for such extension no longer exists, or that there has been a failure to comply with a requirement for submission of progress reports or with other conditions attached to such extension.”
“(2) on the date on which an order with respect to such use under section 409 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [section
of this title] becomes effective,
Effective Date of 1954 Amendment
Act July 22, 1954, ch. 559, § 5,68 Stat. 517
, provided that: “This Act [amending this section and section
of this title and enacting sections
of this title] shall take effect upon the date of its enactment [July 22, 1954], except that with respect to pesticide chemicals for which tolerances or exemptions have not been established under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [section
of this title], the amendment to section 402(a) of such Act [par. (a) of this section] made by section 2 of this Act shall not be effective—
“(1) for the period of one year following the date of the enactment of this Act [July 22, 1954]; or
“(2) for such additional period following such period of one year, but not extending beyond two years after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 22, 1954] as the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare [now Health and Human Services] may prescribe on the basis of a finding that conditions exist which necessitate the prescribing of such additional period.”
Effective Date of 1950 Amendment
Amendment by act Mar. 16, 1950, effective July 1, 1950, see section 7 of act Mar. 16, 1950, set out as an Effective Date note under section
of this title.
Effective Date; Postponement
Par. (c) effective Jan. 1, 1940, see act June 23, 1939, ch. 242, 53 Stat. 853
, set out as an Effective Date; Postponement in Certain Cases note under section
of this title.
Pub. L. 88–625
, § 1,Oct. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 1002
, provided: “That this Act [amending provisions set out as a note under this section and section
, Agriculture] may be cited as the ‘Food Additives Transitional Provisions Amendment of 1964’.”
Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions of Federal Security Administrator to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare [now Health and Human Services], and of Food and Drug Administration in the Department of Agriculture to Federal Security Agency, see notes set out under section
of this title.
Updating Guidance Relating to Fish and Fisheries Products Hazards and Controls
Pub. L. 111–353
, title I, § 103(h),Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3898
, provided that: “The Secretary shall, not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Jan. 4, 2011], update the Fish and Fisheries Products Hazards and Control Guidance to take into account advances in technology that have occurred since the previous publication of such Guidance by the Secretary.”
Guidance Relating to Post Harvest Processing of Raw Oysters
Pub. L. 111–353
, title I, § 114,Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3921
, provided that:
“(a) In General.—Not later than 90 days prior to the issuance of any guidance, regulation, or suggested amendment by the Food and Drug Administration to the National Shellfish Sanitation Program’s Model Ordinance, or the issuance of any guidance or regulation by the Food and Drug Administration relating to the Seafood Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points Program of the Food and Drug Administration (parts 123 and 1240 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulations)[)], where such guidance, regulation or suggested amendment relates to post harvest processing for raw oysters, the Secretary shall prepare and submit to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report which shall include—
“(1) an assessment of how post harvest processing or other equivalent controls feasibly may be implemented in the fastest, safest, and most economical manner;
“(2) the projected public health benefits of any proposed post harvest processing;
“(3) the projected costs of compliance with such post harvest processing measures;
“(4) the impact post harvest processing is expected to have on the sales, cost, and availability of raw oysters;
“(5) criteria for ensuring post harvest processing standards will be applied equally to shellfish imported from all nations of origin;
“(6) an evaluation of alternative measures to prevent, eliminate, or reduce to an acceptable level the occurrence of foodborne illness; and
“(7) the extent to which the Food and Drug Administration has consulted with the States and other regulatory agencies, as appropriate, with regard to post harvest processing measures.
“(b) Limitation.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to the guidance described in section
[section 103(h) ofPub. L. 111–353
, set out as a note above].
“(c) Review and Evaluation.—Not later than 30 days after the Secretary issues a proposed regulation or guidance described in subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the United States shall—
“(1) review and evaluate the report described in (a) and report to Congress on the findings of the estimates and analysis in the report;
“(2) compare such proposed regulation or guidance to similar regulations or guidance with respect to other regulated foods, including a comparison of risks the Secretary may find associated with seafood and the instances of those risks in such other regulated foods; and
“(3) evaluate the impact of post harvest processing on the competitiveness of the domestic oyster industry in the United States and in international markets.
“(d) Waiver.—The requirement of preparing a report under subsection (a) shall be waived if the Secretary issues a guidance that is adopted as a consensus agreement between Federal and State regulators and the oyster industry, acting through the Interstate Shellfish Sanitation Conference.
“(e) Public Access.—Any report prepared under this section shall be made available to the public.”
Domestic Fish or Fish Product Compliance With Food Safety Standards or Procedures Deemed To Have Met Requirements for Federal Commodity Purchase Programs
Pub. L. 104–180
, title VII, § 733,Aug. 6, 1996, 110 Stat. 1601
, provided that: “Hereafter, notwithstanding any other provision of law, any domestic fish or fish product produced in compliance with food safety standards or procedures accepted by the Food and Drug Administration as satisfying the requirements of the ‘Procedures for the Safe and Sanitary Processing and Importing of Fish and Fish Products’ (published by the Food and Drug Administration as a final regulation in the Federal Register of December 18, 1995), shall be deemed to have met any inspection requirements of the Department of Agriculture or other Federal agency for any Federal commodity purchase program, including the program authorized under section 32 of the Act of August 24, 1935 (7
) except that the Department of Agriculture or other Federal agency may utilize lot inspection to establish a reasonable degree of certainty that fish or fish products purchased under a Federal commodity purchase program, including the program authorized under section 32 of the Act of August 24, 1935 (7
), meet Federal product specifications.”