Source
(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, § 201,52 Stat. 1040; July 22, 1954, ch. 559, § 1,68 Stat. 511; Pub. L. 85–929, § 2,Sept. 6, 1958, 72 Stat. 1784; Pub. L. 86–618, title I, § 101,July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 397; Pub. L. 87–781, title I, § 102(a), title III, § 307(a),Oct. 10, 1962, 76 Stat. 781, 796; Pub. L. 89–74, §§ 3(a),
9
(b),July 15, 1965, 79 Stat. 227, 234; Pub. L. 90–399, § 102,July 13, 1968, 82 Stat. 351; Pub. L. 90–639, §§ 1,
4
(a),Oct. 24, 1968, 82 Stat. 1361, 1362; Pub. L. 91–513, title II, § 701(a), (g),Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1281, 1282; Pub. L. 92–516, § 3(3),Oct. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 998; Pub. L. 94–278, title V, § 502(a)(2)(A),Apr. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 411; Pub. L. 94–295, § 3(a)(1)(A), (2),May 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 575; Pub. L. 95–203, § 4(b)(3),Nov. 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 1453; Pub. L. 96–359, § 3,Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1193; Pub. L. 100–670, title I, § 107(a)(1),Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3984; Pub. L. 101–535, § 5(b),Nov. 8, 1990, 104 Stat. 2362; Pub. L. 101–629, § 16(b),Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4526; Pub. L. 102–282, § 6,May 13, 1992, 106 Stat. 161; Pub. L. 102–300, § 6(a), (b),June 16, 1992, 106 Stat. 240; Pub. L. 102–571, title I, § 107(1),Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4499; Pub. L. 103–80, §§ 3(b), (dd)(1),
4
(b),Aug. 13, 1993, 107 Stat. 775, 779; Pub. L. 103–417, §§ 3(a), (b),
10
(a),Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4327, 4332; Pub. L. 104–170, title IV, § 402,Aug. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 1513; Pub. L. 105–115, title I, §§ 121(a),
125
(b)(2)(A), (e),Nov. 21, 1997, 111 Stat. 2320, 2325, 2327; Pub. L. 105–324, § 2(a), (c),Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 3035, 3037; Pub. L. 107–109, § 5(b)(1),Jan. 4, 2002, 115 Stat. 1413; Pub. L. 107–250, title III, § 302(d),Oct. 26, 2002, 116 Stat. 1619; Pub. L. 108–282, title I, § 102(b)(1), (5)(A), (B), title II, § 203(c)(1),Aug. 2, 2004, 118 Stat. 891, 902, 908; Pub. L. 110–85, title X, § 1005(c),Sept. 27, 2007, 121 Stat. 968; Pub. L. 111–31, div. A, title I, § 101(a),June 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 1783.)
References in Text
The Food and Drugs Act of June 30, 1906, as amended, referred to in par. (p)(1), and the Food and Drug Act of June 30, 1906, as amended, referred to in par. (v)(1), is act June 30, 1906, ch. 3915,
34 Stat. 768, which was classified to subchapter I (§ 1 et seq.) of chapter
1 of this title, was repealed (except for section
14a which was transferred to section
376 of this title) by act June 25, 1938, ch. 675, § 1002(a), formerly § 902(a),
52 Stat. 1059; renumbered § 1002(a),
Pub. L. 111–31, div. A, title I, § 101(b)(2),June 22, 2009,
123 Stat. 1784, and is covered by this chapter.
The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, referred to in par. (q)(1), is act June 25, 1947, ch. 125, as amended generally by
Pub. L. 92–516, Oct. 21, 1972,
86 Stat. 973, which is classified generally to subchapter II (§ 136 et seq.) of chapter
6 of Title
7, Agriculture. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section
136 of Title
7 and Tables.
The Poultry Products Inspection Act, referred to in par. (s)(4), is
Pub. L. 85–172, Aug. 28, 1957,
71 Stat. 441, as amended, which is classified generally to chapter 10 (§ 451 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section
451 of this title and Tables.
The Meat Inspection Act of March 4, 1907, as amended and extended, referred to in par. (s)(4), is act Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, titles I to IV, as added Dec. 15, 1967,
Pub. L. 90–201,
81 Stat. 584, which are classified generally to subchapters I to IV (§ 601 et seq.) of chapter
12 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section
601 of this title and Tables.
Section 101(4) of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997, referred to in par. (kk), is section 101(4) of
Pub. L. 105–115, which is set out as a note under section
379g of this title.
Amendments
2009—Par. (rr).
Pub. L. 111–31added par. (rr).
2007—Par. (ff).
Pub. L. 110–85substituted “paragraph (g) and section
350f of this title” for “paragraph (g)” in concluding provisions.
2004–Par. (u).
Pub. L. 108–282, § 102(b)(5)(A), substituted “360b, 360ccc” for “360b”.
Par. (v).
Pub. L. 108–282, § 102(b)(5)(B), inserted concluding provisions.
Pars. (nn) to (pp).
Pub. L. 108–282, § 102(b)(1), added pars. (nn) to (pp).
Par. (qq).
Pub. L. 108–282, § 203(c)(1), added par. (qq).
2002—Par. (kk).
Pub. L. 107–109added par. (kk).
Pars. (ll), (mm).
Pub. L. 107–250added pars. (ll) and (mm).
1998—Par. (q)(1).
Pub. L. 105–324, § 2(a), added subpar. (1) and struck out former subpar. (1) which read as follows: “The term ‘pesticide chemical’ means any substance that is a pesticide within the meaning of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, including all active and inert ingredients of such pesticide.”
Par. (q)(3).
Pub. L. 105–324, § 2(c), substituted “subparagraphs (1) and (2)” for “paragraphs (1) and (2)” in introductory provisions.
1997—Par. (aa).
Pub. L. 105–115, § 125(b)(2)(A), struck out “or 357” after “section
355
(j)”.
Par. (dd).
Pub. L. 105–115, § 125(b)(2)(A), struck out “357,” after “section
355,”.
Par. (ff)(3)(A).
Pub. L. 105–115, § 125(b)(2)(A), struck out “, certified as an antibiotic under section
357 of this title,” before “or licensed as a biologic”.
Par. (ii).
Pub. L. 105–115, § 121(a), added par. (ii).
Par. (jj).
Pub. L. 105–115, § 125(e), added par. (jj).
1996—Par. (q).
Pub. L. 104–170, § 402(a), amended par. (q) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (q) read as follows: “The term ‘pesticide chemical’ means any substance which, alone, in chemical combination or in formulation with one or more other substances, is ‘a pesticide’ within the meaning of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act as now in force or as hereafter amended, and which is used in the production, storage, or transportation of raw agricultural commodities.”
Par. (s)(1), (2).
Pub. L. 104–170, § 402(b), amended subpars. (1) and (2) generally. Prior to amendment, subpars. (1) and (2) read as follows:
“(1) a pesticide chemical in or on a raw agricultural commodity; or
“(2) a pesticide chemical to the extent that it is intended for use or is used in the production, storage, or transportation of any raw agricultural commodity; or”.
Pars. (gg), (hh).
Pub. L. 104–170, § 402(c), added pars. (gg) and (hh).
1994—Par. (g)(1).
Pub. L. 103–417, § 10(a), amended last sentence generally. Prior to amendment, last sentence read as follows: “A food for which a claim, subject to sections
343
(r)(1)(B) and
343
(r)(3) of this title or sections
343
(r)(1)(B) and
343
(r)(5)(D) of this title, is made in accordance with the requirements of section
343
(r) of this title is not a drug under clause (B) solely because the label or labeling contains such a claim.”
Par. (s)(6).
Pub. L. 103–417, § 3(b), added subpar. (6).
Par. (ff).
Pub. L. 103–417, § 3(a), added par. (ff).
1993—Pars. (c), (d).
Pub. L. 103–80, § 3(dd)(1), substituted “Health and Human Services” for “Agriculture”.
Par. (h).
Pub. L. 103–80, § 4(b), amended directory language of
Pub. L. 102–300, § 6(a)(1). See 1992 amendment note below.
Pars. (v) to (ff).
Pub. L. 103–80, § 3(b), redesignated pars. (w) to (ff) as (v) to (ee), respectively.
1992—Pars. (c), (d).
Pub. L. 102–300, § 6(b)(1), which directed the substitution of “Health and Human Services” for “Health, Education, and Welfare”, could not be executed because such words did not appear in the original statutory text. See 1993 Amendment note above and Transfer of Functions notes below.
Par. (h).
Pub. L. 102–300, § 6(a)(1), as amended by
Pub. L. 103–80, § 4(b), substituted “its primary” for “any of its principal” in two places in concluding provisions.
Par. (u).
Pub. L. 102–571substituted “379e” for “376”.
Par. (y)(1).
Pub. L. 102–300, § 6(b)(2), struck out “of Health, Education, and Welfare” after “employees of the Department”.
Pars. (bb) to (ee).
Pub. L. 102–282added pars. (bb) to (ee).
Par. (ff).
Pub. L. 102–300, § 6(a)(2), added par. (ff).
1990—Par. (g)(1).
Pub. L. 101–629, § 16(b)(1), struck out “; but does not include devices or their components, parts, or accessories” after “clause (A), (B), or (C)”.
Pub. L. 101–535inserted at end “A food for which a claim, subject to sections
343
(r)(1)(B) and
343
(r)(3) of this title or sections
343
(r)(1)(B) and
343
(r)(5)(D) of this title, is made in accordance with the requirements of section
343
(r) of this title is not a drug under clause (B) solely because the label or labeling contains such a claim.”
Par. (h)(3).
Pub. L. 101–629, § 16(b)(2), which directed the amendment of subpar. (3) by substituting “its primary” for “any of its principal”, could not be executed because “any of its principal” did not appear in subpar. (3).
1988—Par. (w)(3).
Pub. L. 100–670struck out subpar. (3) which read as follows: “which drug is composed wholly or partly of any kind of penicillin, streptomycin, chlortetracycline, chloramphenicol, or bacitracin, or any derivative thereof, except when there is in effect a published order of the Secretary declaring such drug not to be a new animal drug on the grounds that (A) the requirement of certification of batches of such drug, as provided for in section
360b
(n) of this title, is not necessary to insure that the objectives specified in paragraph (3) thereof are achieved and (B) that neither subparagraph (1) nor (2) of this paragraph (w) applies to such drug.”
1980—Par. (aa).
Pub. L. 96–359added par. (aa).
1977—Par. (z).
Pub. L. 95–203added par. (z).
1976—Par. (h).
Pub. L. 94–295, § 3(a)(1)(A), expanded definition of “device” to include implements, machines, implants, in vitro reagents, and other similar or related articles, added recognition in the National Formulary or the United States Pharmacopeia, or any supplement to the Formulary or Pharmacopeia, to the enumeration of conditions under which a device may qualify for inclusion under this chapter, and inserted requirements that a device be one which does not achieve any of its principal intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of any of its principal intended purposes.
Par. (n).
Pub. L. 94–278inserted “or advertising” after “labeling” wherever appearing.
Par. (y).
Pub. L. 94–295, § 3(a)(2), added par. (y).
1972—Par. (q).
Pub. L. 92–516substituted reference to pesticide for reference to economic poison.
1970—Par. (a)(2).
Pub. L. 91–513, § 701(g), struck out reference to sections
321,
331
(i),
331
(p),
331
(q),
332,
333,
334,
337,
360,
360a,
372,
373,
374, and
375 of this title as they apply to depressant or stimulant drugs.
Par. (v).
Pub. L. 91–513, § 701(a), struck out par. (v) which defined “depressant or stimulant drug”.
1968—Par. (a)(2).
Pub. L. 90–639, § 4(a), extended provisions to cover depressant and stimulant drugs, the containers thereof, and equipment used in manufacturing, compounding, or processing such drugs, to the Canal Zone.
Par. (p).
Pub. L. 90–399, § 102(a), (b), inserted “(except a new animal drug or an animal feed bearing or containing a new animal drug)” after “Any drug” in subpars. (1) and (2), respectively.
Par. (s)(5).
Pub. L. 90–399, § 102(c), added subpar. (5).
Par. (u).
Pub. L. 90–399, § 102(d), inserted reference to section
360b of this title.
Par. (v)(3).
Pub. L. 90–639, § 1, inserted reference to lysergic acid diethylamide.
Pars. (w), (x).
Pub. L. 90–399, § 102(e), added pars. (w) and (x).
1965—Par. (g).
Pub. L. 89–74, § 9(b), designated existing provisions as subpar. (1), redesignated cls. (1) to (4) thereof as (A) to (D), substituted “(A), (B), or (C)” for “(1), (2), or (3)” and added subpar. (2).
Par. (v).
Pub. L. 89–74, § 3(a), added par. (v).
1962—Par. (a).
Pub. L. 87–781, § 307(a), designated existing provisions as subpar. (2), inserted “Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the”, and added subpar. (1).
Par. (p)(1).
Pub. L. 87–781, § 102(a)(1), inserted “and effectiveness” after “to evaluate the safety”, and “and effective” after “as safe”.
Par. (p)(2).
Pub. L. 87–781, § 102(a)(2), inserted “and effectiveness” after “safety”.
1960—Par. (s).
Pub. L. 86–618, § 101(a), excluded color additives from definition of “food additive”.
Par. (t).
Pub. L. 86–618, § 101(c), added par. (t). Former par. (t) redesignated (u).
Par. (u).
Pub. L. 86–618, § 101(b), redesignated par. (t) as (u) and inserted reference to section
376 of this title.
1958—Pars. (s), (t).
Pub. L. 85–929added pars. (s) and (t).
1954—Pars. (q), (r). Act July 22, 1954, added pars. (q) and (r).
Effective Date of 2004 Amendment
Pub. L. 108–282, title II, § 203(d),Aug. 2, 2004,
118 Stat. 908, provided that: “The amendments made by this section [amending this section and sections
343 and
343–1 of this title] shall apply to any food that is labeled on or after January 1, 2006.”
Effective Date of 1997 Amendment
Section 501 of
Pub. L. 105–115provided that: “Except as otherwise provided in this Act [see Short Title of 1997 Amendment note set out under section
301 of this title], this Act and the amendments made by this Act, other than the provisions of and the amendments made by sections
111,
121,
125, and
307 [enacting section
355a of this title, amending this section and sections
331,
335a,
351,
352,
360,
360j,
360aa to
360cc,
360ee,
374,
379g,
381, and
382 of this title, section
45C of Title
26, Internal Revenue Code, section
156 of Title
35, Patents, and section
8126 of Title
38, Veterans’ Benefits, repealing sections
356 and
357 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections
351 and
355 of this title], shall take effect 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 21, 1997].”
Effective Date of 1990 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 101–535effective six months after the date of the promulgation of final regulations to implement section
343
(r) of this title, or if such regulations are not promulgated, the date proposed regulations are to be considered as such final regulations (Nov. 8, 1992), with exception for persons marketing food the brand name of which contains a term defined by the Secretary under section
343
(r)(2)(A)(i) of this title, see section 10(a) of
Pub. L. 101–535, set out as a note under section
343 of this title.
Effective Date of 1976 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 94–278effective 180 days after Apr. 22, 1976, see section 502(c) of
Pub. L. 94–278, set out as a note under section
334 of this title.
Effective Date of 1972 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 92–516effective at the close of Oct. 21, 1972, except if regulations are necessary for the implementation of any provision that becomes effective on Oct. 21, 1972, and continuation in effect of subchapter
I of chapter
6 of Title
7, and regulations thereunder, relating to the control of economic poisons, as in existence prior to Oct. 21, 1972, until superseded by provisions of
Pub. L. 92–516, and regulations thereunder, see section 4 of
Pub. L. 92–516, set out as an Effective Date note under section
136 of Title
7, Agriculture.
Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 91–513effective on first day of seventh calendar month that begins after Oct. 26, 1970, see section 704 of
Pub. L. 91–513, set out as an Effective Date note under section
801 of this title.
Effective Date of 1968 Amendments; Transitional Provisions
Section 6 of
Pub. L. 90–639provided that: “The amendments made by this Act [amending this section, sections
331,
333,
334, and
360a of this title, and provisions set out as a note under section
289a of Title
42, The Public Health and Welfare] shall apply only with respect to violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [this chapter] committed after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 24, 1968].”
Amendment by
Pub. L. 90–399effective on first day of thirteenth calendar month after July 13, 1968, except that in the case of a drug (other than one subject to section
360b
(n) of this title) intended for use in animals other than man which, on Oct. 9, 1962, was commercially used or sold in the United States, was not a new drug as defined in par. (p) of this section then in force, and was not covered by an effective application under section
355 of this title, the words “effectiveness” and “effective” contained in par. (v) of this section not applicable to such drug when intended solely for use under conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in labeling with respect to such drug on that day, see section 108(a), (b)(3) of
Pub. L. 90–399, as amended, set out as an Effective Date and Transitional Provisions note under section
360b of this title.
Effective Date of 1965 Amendment
Section 11 of
Pub. L. 89–74provided that: “The foregoing provisions of this Act [see Short Title of 1965 Amendment note set out under section
301 of this title] shall take effect on the first day of the seventh calendar month [Feb. 1, 1966] following the month in which this Act is enacted [July 15, 1965]; except that (1) the Secretary shall permit persons, owning or operating any establishment engaged in manufacturing, preparing, propagating, compounding, processing, wholesaling, jobbing, or distributing any depressant or stimulant drug, as referred to in the amendments made by section 4 of this Act to section 510 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [section
360 of this title], to register their name, places of business, and establishments, and other information prescribed by such amendments, with the Secretary prior to such effective date, and (2) sections 201(v) and 511(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by this act [par. (v) of this section and par. (g) of section
360a of this title], and the provisions of sections
8 [amending section
372 of this title and section
1114 of Title
18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure] and 10 [set out as a note under this section] shall take effect upon the date of enactment of this Act [July 15, 1965].”
Effective Date of 1962 Amendment
Section 107 of
Pub. L. 87–781provided that:
“(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the amendments made by the foregoing sections of this part A [amending this section and sections
331,
332,
348,
351 to
353,
355,
357,
379e of this title, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section
355 of this title] shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 10, 1962].
“(b) The amendments made by sections
101,
103,
105, and
106 of this part A [amending sections
331,
332,
351,
352,
355, and
357 of this title] shall, with respect to any drug, take effect on the first day of the seventh calendar month following the month in which this Act is enacted [Oct. 1962].
“(c)(1) As used in this subsection, the term ‘enactment date’ means the date of enactment of this Act; and the term ‘basic Act’ means the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [this chapter].
“(2) An application filed pursuant to section 505(b) of the basic Act [section
355
(b) of this title] which was ‘effective’ within the meaning of that Act on the day immediately preceding the enactment date shall be deemed as of the enactment date, to be an application ‘approved’ by the Secretary within the meaning of the basic Act as amended by this Act.
“(3) In the case of any drug with respect to which an application filed under section 505(b) of the basic Act is deemed to be an approved application on the enactment date by virtue of paragraph (2) of this subsection—
“(A) the amendments made by this Act to section
201
(p), and to subsections (b) and (d) ofsection
505, of the basic Act [par. (p) of this section, and subsecs. (b) and (d) ofsection
355 of this title], insofar as such amendments relate to the effectiveness of drugs, shall not, so long as approval of such application is not withdrawn or suspended pursuant to section 505(e) of that Act [section
355
(e) of this title], apply to such drug when intended solely for use under conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in labeling covered by such approved application, but shall apply to any changed use, or conditions of use, prescribed, recommended, or suggested in its labeling, including such conditions of use as are the subject of an amendment or supplement to such application pending on, or filed after, the enactment date; and
“(B) clause (3) of the first sentence of section 505(e) of the basic Act, as amended by this Act [section
355
(e) of this title], shall not apply to such drug when intended solely for use under conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in labeling covered by such approved application (except with respect to such use, or conditions of use, as are the subject of an amendment or supplement to such approved application, which amendment or supplement has been approved after the enactment date under section 505 of the basic Act as amended by this Act [section
355 of this title]) until whichever of the following first occurs: (i) the expiration of the two-year period beginning with the enactment date; (ii) the effective date of an order under section 505(e) of the basic Act [section
355
(e) of this title], other than clause (3) of the first sentence of such section
505
(e) [section
355
(e) of this title], withdrawing or suspending the approval of such application.
“(4) In the case of any drug which, on the day immediately preceding the enactment date, (A) was commercially used or sold in the United States, (B) was not a new drug as defined by section 201(p) of the basic Act as then in force [par. (p) of this section], and (C) was not covered by an effective application under section 505 of that Act [section
355 of this title], the amendments to section
201
(p) [par. (p) of this section] made by this Act shall not apply to such drug when intended solely for use under conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in labeling with respect to such drug on that day.”
Effective Date of 1960 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 86–618effective July 12, 1960, subject to provisions of section 203 of
Pub. L. 86–618, see section 202 of
Pub. L. 86–618, set out as a note under section
379e of this title.
Effective Date of 1958 Amendment
Amendment by
Pub. L. 85–929effective Sept. 6, 1958, see section 6(a) of
Pub. L. 85–929, set out as a note under section
342 of this title.
Effective Date of 1954 Amendment
For effective date of amendment by act July 22, 1954, see section 5 of that act, set out as a note under section
342 of this title.
Construction of Amendments by Pub. L. 102–282
Amendment by
Pub. L. 102–282not to preclude any other civil, criminal, or administrative remedy provided under Federal or State law, including any private right of action against any person for the same action subject to any action or civil penalty under an amendment made by
Pub. L. 102–282, see section 7 of
Pub. L. 102–282, set out as a note under section
335a of this title.
Construction of Amendments by Pub. L. 101–535
Amendments by
Pub. L. 101–535not to be construed to alter authority of Secretary of Health and Human Services and Secretary of Agriculture under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (
21 U.S.C.
301 et seq.), the Federal Meat Inspection Act (
21 U.S.C.
601 et seq.), the Poultry Products Inspection Act (
21 U.S.C.
451 et seq.), and the Egg Products Inspection Act (
21 U.S.C.
1031 et seq.), see section 9 of
Pub. L. 101–535, set out as a note under section
343 of this title.
Savings Provision
Section 702 of
Pub. L. 91–513, as amended by
Pub. L. 93–481, § 2,Oct. 26, 1974,
88 Stat. 1455, provided that:
“(a) Prosecutions for any violation of law occurring prior to the effective date [see Effective Date of 1970 Amendment note above] of section
701 [repealing section
360a of this title, and amending sections
321,
331,
333,
334,
360,
372, and
381 of this title, sections
1114 and
1952 of Title
18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section
242 of Title
42, The Public Health and Welfare] shall not be affected by the repeals or amendments made by such section, or abated by reason thereof.
“(b) Civil seizures or forfeitures and injunctive proceedings commenced prior to the effective date of section
701 shall not be affected by the repeals or amendments made by such section, or abated by reason thereof.
“(c) All administrative proceedings pending before the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs [now the Drug Enforcement Administration] on the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 27, 1970] shall be continued and brought to final determination in accord with laws and regulations in effect prior to such date of enactment. Where a drug is finally determined under such proceedings to be a depressant or stimulant drug, as defined in section 201(v) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [par. (v) of this section], such drug shall automatically be controlled under this title [subchapter
I of chapter
13 of this title] by the Attorney General without further proceedings and listed in the appropriate schedule after he has obtained the recommendation of the Secretary. Any drug with respect to which such a final determination has been made prior to the date of enactment of this Act which is not listed in section
202 [section
812 of this title] within schedules I through V shall automatically be controlled under this title [subchapter
I of chapter
13 of this title] by the Attorney General without further proceedings, and be listed in the appropriate schedule, after he has obtained the recommendations of the Secretary.
“(d) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section or section
1103 [of
Pub. L. 91–513, set out as a note under sections
171 to
174 of this title], section
4202 of title
18, United States Code, shall apply to any individual convicted under any of the laws repealed by this title or title III [subchapter
I or subchapter
II of chapter
13 of this title] without regard to the terms of any sentence imposed on such individual under such law.”
Transfer of Functions
Secretary and Department of Health, Education, and Welfare redesignated Secretary and Department of Health and Human Services by
Pub. L. 96–88, title V, § 509(b),Oct. 17, 1979,
93 Stat. 695, which is classified to section
3508
(b) of Title
20, Education.
Functions of Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare [now Health and Human Services] under Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, to the extent such functions related to administration and enforcement of the Poison Prevention Packaging Act of 1970 (
15 U.S.C.
1471 et seq.), transferred to Consumer Product Safety Commission by section
2079 of Title
15, Commerce and Trade.
Functions of Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare [now Health and Human Services] under Drug Abuse Control Amendments of 1965 [see Short Title of 1965 Amendment note set out under section
301 of this title] transferred to Attorney General except function of regulating counterfeiting of those drugs which are not “depressant or stimulant” drugs, see section 2 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1968, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Functions of Federal Security Administrator transferred to Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare and all agencies of Federal Security Agency transferred to Department of Health, Education, and Welfare by section 5 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1953, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. Federal Security Agency and office of Administrator abolished by section 8 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1953.
Food and Drug Administration in Department of Agriculture and its functions, except those functions relating to administration of Insecticide Act of 1910 and Naval Stores Act, transferred to Federal Security Agency, to be administered under direction and supervision of Federal Security Administrator, by Reorg. Plan No. IV of 1940, set out in the Appendix to Title 5.
Regulation of Tobacco
Section 422 of
Pub. L. 105–115provided that: “Nothing in this Act [see Short Title of 1997 Amendment note set out under section
301 of this title] or the amendments made by this Act shall be construed to affect the question of whether the Secretary of Health and Human Services has any authority to regulate any tobacco product, tobacco ingredient, or tobacco additive. Such authority, if any, shall be exercised under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [
21 U.S.C.
301 et seq.] as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 21, 1997].”
Congressional Findings Relating to Pub. L. 103–417
Section 2 of
Pub. L. 103–417provided that: “Congress finds that—
“(1) improving the health status of United States citizens ranks at the top of the national priorities of the Federal Government;
“(2) the importance of nutrition and the benefits of dietary supplements to health promotion and disease prevention have been documented increasingly in scientific studies;
“(3)(A) there is a link between the ingestion of certain nutrients or dietary supplements and the prevention of chronic diseases such as cancer, heart disease, and osteoporosis; and
“(B) clinical research has shown that several chronic diseases can be prevented simply with a healthful diet, such as a diet that is low in fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, and sodium, with a high proportion of plant-based foods;
“(4) healthful diets may mitigate the need for expensive medical procedures, such as coronary bypass surgery or angioplasty;
“(5) preventive health measures, including education, good nutrition, and appropriate use of safe nutritional supplements will limit the incidence of chronic diseases, and reduce long-term health care expenditures;
“(6)(A) promotion of good health and healthy lifestyles improves and extends lives while reducing health care expenditures; and
“(B) reduction in health care expenditures is of paramount importance to the future of the country and the economic well-being of the country;
“(7) there is a growing need for emphasis on the dissemination of information linking nutrition and long-term good health;
“(8) consumers should be empowered to make choices about preventive health care programs based on data from scientific studies of health benefits related to particular dietary supplements;
“(9) national surveys have revealed that almost 50 percent of the 260,000,000 Americans regularly consume dietary supplements of vitamins, minerals, or herbs as a means of improving their nutrition;
“(10) studies indicate that consumers are placing increased reliance on the use of nontraditional health care providers to avoid the excessive costs of traditional medical services and to obtain more holistic consideration of their needs;
“(11) the United States will spend over $1,000,000,000,000 on health care in 1994, which is about 12 percent of the Gross National Product of the United States, and this amount and percentage will continue to increase unless significant efforts are undertaken to reverse the increase;
“(12)(A) the nutritional supplement industry is an integral part of the economy of the United States;
“(B) the industry consistently projects a positive trade balance; and
“(C) the estimated 600 dietary supplement manufacturers in the United States produce approximately 4,000 products, with total annual sales of such products alone reaching at least $4,000,000,000;
“(13) although the Federal Government should take swift action against products that are unsafe or adulterated, the Federal Government should not take any actions to impose unreasonable regulatory barriers limiting or slowing the flow of safe products and accurate information to consumers;
“(14) dietary supplements are safe within a broad range of intake, and safety problems with the supplements are relatively rare; and
“(15)(A) legislative action that protects the right of access of consumers to safe dietary supplements is necessary in order to promote wellness; and
“(B) a rational Federal framework must be established to supersede the current ad hoc, patchwork regulatory policy on dietary supplements.”
Dissemination of Information Regarding the Dangers of Drug Abuse
Section 5 of
Pub. L. 90–639provided that: “It is the sense of the Congress that, because of the inadequate knowledge on the part of the people of the United States of the substantial adverse effects of misuse of depressant and stimulant drugs, and of other drugs liable to abuse, on the individual, his family, and the community, the highest priority should be given to Federal programs to disseminate information which may be used to educate the public, particularly young persons, regarding the dangers of drug abuse.”
Congressional Findings and Declaration of Policy
Section 2 of
Pub. L. 89–74provided that: “The Congress hereby finds and declares that there is a widespread illicit traffic in depressant and stimulant drugs moving in or otherwise affecting interstate commerce; that the use of such drugs, when not under the supervision of a licensed practitioner, often endangers safety on the highways (without distinction of interstate and intrastate traffic thereon) and otherwise has become a threat to the public health and safety, making additional regulation of such drugs necessary regardless of the intrastate or interstate origin of such drugs; that in order to make regulation and protection of interstate commerce in such drugs effective, regulation of intrastate commerce is also necessary because, among other things, such drugs, when held for illicit sale, often do not bear labeling showing their place of origin and because in the form in which they are so held or in which they are consumed a determination of their place of origin is often extremely difficult or impossible; and that regulation of interstate commerce without the regulation of intrastate commerce in such drugs, as provided in this Act [see Short Title of 1965 Amendment note set out under section
301 of this title], would discriminate against and adversely affect interstate commerce in such drugs.”
Effect of Drug Abuse Control Amendments of 1965 on State Laws
Section 10 of
Pub. L. 89–74provided that:
“(a) Nothing in this Act [enacting section
360a of this title, amending sections
321,
331,
333,
334,
360, and
372 of this title and section
1114 of Title
18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections
321,
352, and
360a of this title] shall be construed as authorizing the manufacture, compounding, processing, possession, sale, delivery, or other disposal of any drug in any State in contravention of the laws of such State.
“(b) No provision of this Act nor any amendment made by it shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of the Congress to occupy the field in which such provision or amendment operates to the exclusion of any State law on the same subject matter, unless there is a direct and positive conflict between such provision or amendment and such State law so that the two cannot be reconciled or consistently stand together.
“(c) No amendment made by this Act shall be construed to prevent the enforcement in the courts of any State of any statute of such State prescribing any criminal penalty for any act made criminal by any such amendment.”
Effect of Drug Amendments of 1962 on State Laws
Section 202 of
Pub. L. 87–781provided that: “Nothing in the amendments made by this Act [enacting sections
358 to
360, amending sections
321,
331,
332,
348,
351 to
353,
355,
357,
372,
374,
379e, and
381 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections
321,
331,
332,
352,
355,
360, and
374 of this title] to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [this chapter] shall be construed as invalidating any provision of State law which would be valid in the absence of such amendments unless there is a direct and positive conflict between such amendments and such provision of State law.”
Definitions
Section 2 of
Pub. L. 105–115provided that: “In this Act [see Short Title of 1997 Amendment note set out under section
301 of this title], the terms ‘drug’, ‘device’, ‘food’, and ‘dietary supplement’ have the meaning given such terms in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (
21 U.S.C.
321).”