42 CFR § 422.330 - CMS-identified overpayments associated with payment data submitted by MA organizations.
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section -
Applicable reconciliation date occurs on the date of the annual final deadline for risk adjustment data submission described at § 422.310(g)(2)(ii).
Erroneous payment data means payment data that should not have been submitted either because the data submitted are inaccurate or because the data are inconsistent with Medicare Part C requirements.
(b) Request to correct payment data.
(1) When CMS identifies erroneous payment data submitted by an MA organization (other than an error identified through the process described in § 422.311), CMS may send a data correction notice to the MA organization requesting that the MA organization correct the payment data.
(2) The notice will include or make reference to the specific payment data that need to be corrected, the reason why CMS believes that the payment data are erroneous, and the timeframe for correcting the payment data.
(c) Payment offset.
(1) If the MA organization fails to submit the corrected payment data within the timeframe as requested in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, CMS will conduct a payment offset against payments made to the MA organization if -
(1) The dollar amount of the offset from plan payments.
(2) An explanation of how the erroneous data were identified and used to calculate the payment offset amount.
(ii) Content of request. The written request for reconsideration must specify the findings or issues with which the MA organization disagrees and the reasons for its disagreement. As part of its request for reconsideration, the MA organization may include any additional documentary evidence in support of its position. Any additional evidence must be submitted with the request for reconsideration. Additional information submitted after this time will be rejected as untimely.
(iii) Conduct of reconsideration. In conducting the reconsideration, the CMS reconsideration official reviews the underlying data that were used to determine the amount of the payment offset and any additional documentary evidence timely submitted by the MA organization.
(v) Effect of reconsideration decision. The decision of the CMS reconsideration official is final and binding unless a timely request for an informal hearing is filed in accordance with paragraph (e)(2) of this section.
(2) Informal hearing. An MA organization dissatisfied with CMS' reconsideration decision made under paragraph (e)(1) of this section is entitled to an informal hearing as provided for under paragraphs (e)(2)(i) through (e)(2)(v) of this section.
(ii) Content of request. The request for an informal hearing must include a copy of the reconsideration decision and must specify the findings or issues in the decision with which the MA organization disagrees and the reasons for its disagreement.
(iii) Informal hearing procedures. The informal hearing will be conducted in accordance with the following:
(B) The informal hearing is conducted by a CMS hearing officer who neither receives testimony nor accepts any new evidence that was not timely presented with the reconsideration request. The CMS hearing officer is limited to the review of the record that was before the CMS reconsideration official when CMS made its reconsideration determination.
(C) The CMS hearing officer will review the proceeding before the CMS reconsideration official on the record made before the CMS reconsideration official using the clearly erroneous standard of review.
(v) Effect of hearing officer's decision. The hearing officer's decision is final and binding, unless the decision is reversed or modified by the Administrator in accordance with paragraph (e)(3) of this section.
(3) Review by the Administrator. The Administrator review will be conducted in the following manner:
(i) An MA organization that has received a hearing officer's decision may request review by the Administrator within 30 days of the date of issuance of the hearing officer's decision under paragraph (e)(2)(iv) of this section. The MA organization may submit written arguments to the Administrator for review.
(ii) After receiving a request for review, the Administrator has the discretion to elect to review the hearing officer's determination in accordance with paragraph (e)(3)(iv) of this section or to decline to review the hearing officer's decision.
(iv) If the Administrator elects to review the hearing officer's decision, the Administrator will review the hearing officer's decision, as well as any information included in the record of the hearing officer's decision and any written argument submitted by the MA organization, and determine whether to uphold, reverse, or modify the hearing officer's decision.
(v) The Administrator's determination is final and binding.
(f) Matters subject to appeal and burden of proof.
(2) The MA organization bears the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence in demonstrating that CMS' finding that the payment data were erroneous was incorrect or otherwise inconsistent with applicable program requirements.