Jump to navigation
(a) Any party aggrieved by an action taken by the Administrator, as defined in § 54.701, § 54.703, or § 54.705, must first seek review from the Administrator.
(b) Any party aggrieved by an action taken by the Administrator, after seeking review from the Administrator, may then seek review from the Federal Communications Commission, as set forth in § 54.722.
(c) Parties seeking waivers of the Commission's rules shall seek relief directly from the Commission.
This is a list of United States Code sections, Statutes at Large, Public Laws, and Presidential Documents, which provide rulemaking authority for this CFR Part.
This list is taken from the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules provided by GPO [Government Printing Office].
It is not guaranteed to be accurate or up-to-date, though we do refresh the database weekly. More limitations on accuracy are described at the GPO site.
§ 151 - Purposes of chapter; Federal Communications Commission created
§ 154 - Federal Communications Commission
§ 155 - Commission
§ 201 - Service and charges
§ 205 - Commission authorized to prescribe just and reasonable charges; penalties for violations
§ 214 - Extension of lines or discontinuance of service; certificate of public convenience and necessity
§ 219 - Reports by carriers; contents and requirements generally
§ 220 - Accounts, records, and memoranda
§ 254 - Universal service
§ 303 - Powers and duties of Commission
§ 403 - Inquiry by Commission on its own motion
§ 1302 - Advanced telecommunications incentives
Title 47 published on 2015-10-01
The following are ALL rules, proposed rules, and notices (chronologically) published in the Federal Register relating to 47 CFR Part 54 after this date.
The Federal Communications Commission published in the Federal Register of October 2, 2015, a document concerning Petitions for Reconsideration in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding. This document corrects the DATES section and replaces “October 13, 2015” with “October 29, 2015” as the correct due date for replies to oppositions.
In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) reopens the comment periods for oppositions and replies to oppositions to CTIA—The Wireless Association (CTIA)'s Petition for Partial Reconsideration of the Commission's Order on Reconsideration requiring Eligible Telecommunications Carriers (ETCs) to retain documentation demonstrating subscriber eligibility for the Lifeline Program.
Petitions for Reconsideration (Petitions) have been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding by Bruce Oberlies, on behalf of Wireless Innovation Forum; Jon M. Peha on behalf of Jon M. Peha; Chuck Powers, on behalf of Motorola Solutions, Inc.; Brian M. Josef, on behalf of CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION; John T. Scott, III, on behalf of Verizon; Tom Stroup, on behalf of Satellite Industry Association; Rick Kaplan, on behalf of NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS; and Brian Hendricks, on behalf of Nokia Networks (D/B/A Nokia Solutions and Network US LLC).