2 AAC 64.030 - Canons of conduct
(a) The canons of conduct in
AS
44.64.050(b) are part of the
code of hearing officer conduct. A hearing officer or administrative law judge
shall comply with the canons and requirements of
2 AAC 64.010 -
2 AAC 64.090. Noncompliance may be grounds for
corrective or disciplinary action under
AS
44.64.050(d) and
2 AAC 64.060.
(b) To comply with the requirement
(1) to uphold the integrity and independence
of the office and of the hearing function, a hearing officer or administrative
law judge shall establish and personally observe high standards of conduct, and
avoid improper ex parte communications with private and agency parties about
the subject of a hearing request, so that the integrity and independence of the
office and the hearing function will be preserved;
(2) to avoid impropriety and the appearance
of impropriety, a hearing officer or administrative law judge shall
(A) respect and follow the law;
(B) act in a manner that promotes public
confidence in the hearing function; and
(C) refrain from allowing familial, social,
political or other relationships to influence the conduct of the
hearing;
(3) to perform
the duties of the office or of the hearing function impartially and diligently,
a hearing officer or administrative law judge
(A) shall faithfully follow the
law;
(B) shall maintain
professional competence in the law;
(C) may not be swayed by partisan interests
or fear of criticism;
(D) shall
maintain order and decorum in hearings and related proceedings;
(E) shall show patience, dignity, and
courtesy to all parties, their representatives, witnesses, and others with whom
the hearing officer or administrative law judge deals in an official capacity,
and shall require similar behavior from parties and their
representatives;
(F) shall refrain
from initiating, permitting, or considering improper ex parte
communications;
(G) shall dispose
of all hearing-related matters promptly, officially, and fairly;
(H) shall require participants in proceedings
to refrain from manifesting personal bias or prejudice against parties,
witnesses, their representatives, or others;
(I) shall refrain from making public comment
outside of the proceedings on a case before the hearing officer or
administrative law judge while the case is pending; and
(J) shall refrain from disclosing or using,
for any purpose unrelated to official duties, information acquired in an
official capacity that by law is not available to the general public;
(4) to conduct unofficial
activities in ways that minimize the risk of conflict with the obligations of
the office or the hearing function, a hearing officer or administrative law
judge shall
(A) seek reassignment of a case in
which the hearing officer or administrative law judge has a conflict of
interest under
2 AAC 64.040; and
(B) conduct unofficial activities so that
they do not cast reasonable doubt on the hearing officer's or administrative
law judge's adjudicatory capacity or impartiality, demean the office or the
hearing function, or interfere with the proper performance of the hearing
officer's or administrative law judge's official duties; activities that could
interfere with a hearing officer's or administrative law judge's official
duties include
(i) advocating a position
before an executive branch agency on a subject related to decisions that may be
heard by the hearing officer or administrative law judge;
(ii) representing a person in litigation
with, or relating to a decision of, a state agency; and
(iii) advising a person about the person's
rights and responsibilities regarding legal issues that have or might come
before the hearing officer or administrative law judge for a ruling;
(5) to refrain from
inappropriate activity in seeking employment with another agency or employer or
in seeking reappointment, a hearing officer or administrative law judge may not
discuss the matters that are before the hearing officer or administrative law
judge with a prospective employer or take or promise any action that could be
understood reasonably as using the hearing officer's or administrative law
judge's official position to benefit the prospective employer, other than the
benefits resulting from employing a person with the skills and experience of a
hearing officer or administrative law judge.
(c) Commentary on and decisions applying the
Alaska Code of Judicial Conduct may be used as guidance in interpreting and
applying 2 AAC 64.010 -
2 AAC 64.050.
Notes
Authority:AS 44.64.020
AS 44.64.050
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.