7 AAC 41.423 - Intentional program violation hearings
(a) If the
department believes that a family or provider has committed an intentional
program violation under
7
AAC 41.410 the department will refer the matter to the
office of administrative hearings (AS
44.64.010) for scheduling of an intentional
program violation hearing. After the office of administrative hearings sets a
date and time for the hearing, the department will provide the family or
provider with a written notice at least 30 calendar days before the scheduled
date of the intentional program violation hearing. In the notice the department
will include
(1) the date, time, and location
of the hearing;
(2) the accusations
against the family or provider;
(3)
a summary of the evidence to be presented by the department, and how and where
the evidence can be examined;
(4) a
description of the availability of a hearing postponement, as specified in (b)
of this section;
(5) an explanation
of the consequences of failure to appear at the hearing, as provided in (c) of
this section;
(6) instructions on
how to claim good cause for failure to appear at the hearing, as provided in
(d) of this section;
(7) an
explanation of the intentional program violation and penalties as provided in
7
AAC 41.425 as applicable to the case scheduled for
hearing;
(8) a statement that the
hearing does not preclude the state or federal government from prosecuting the
family or provider for an intentional program violation in a civil or criminal
court action, or from recovery of an overpayment;
(9) an explanation of the public resources
available that may provide free legal representation, and that the department
is not responsible for providing legal representation;
(10) an explanation that the hearing may be
held face-to-face or by telephone, at the administrative law judge's
discretion;
(11) a statement that
the accused family or provider has the right to remain silent and that anything
said or signed by the family or provider concerning the accusations can be used
against the accused family or provider in the hearing or a court of law;
and
(12) a statement that the
accused family or provider may waive the right to the intentional program
violation hearing; in the statement the department will inform the family or
provider
(A) of the date by which a signed
waiver-of-rights form must be received by the department;
(B) that a waiver of rights will result in
penalties up to and including disqualification, benefit reduction, and
repayment obligations, even if the accused does not admit to the facts as
represented by the department; and
(C) that the family or provider may specify
on the waiver-of-rights form whether the family or provider admits to the facts
as represented by the department.
(b) An accused family or provider may request
one hearing postponement of no more than 30 calendar days after the date of the
first scheduled intentional program violation hearing if the request for
postponement is received by the department at least 10 calendar days before the
first scheduled hearing,
(c) If an
accused family or provider fails to appear at an intentional program violation
hearing, the administrative law judge shall
(1) hold the hearing without the accused
family or provider,
(2) consider
the evidence based on the information provided by the department; and
(3) determine if an intentional program
violation was committed.
(d) An accused family or provider who fails
to appear, or have a representative appear, for a scheduled intentional program
violation hearing has 10 calendar days after the date of the scheduled hearing
to contact the office of administrative hearings, provide evidence of good
cause for failure to appear, and request that a new hearing be scheduled. If
the administrative law judge determines that the family or provider had good
cause for not appearing, the administrative law judge shall schedule a new
hearing and reopen the hearing record.
(e) An administrative law judge with the
office of administrative hearings shall conduct a hearing under this section.
After hearing the facts of the case and examining the evidence, the
administrative law judge shall decide whether a family or provider has
committed an intentional program violation. The administrative law judge shall
base a determination of intentional program violation on clear and convincing
evidence that the family or provider committed, and intended to commit, an
intentional program violation.
(f)
At a hearing, the accused family or provider may choose self-representation, or
to Be represented by an attorney or any other person who may be helpful in
defense of the accusation. If the accused family or provider chooses to be
represented at the hearing by an attorney or any other person, the
representative of the accused family or provider shall submit a completed
permission form provided by the department, that is signed by the accused
family or provider and the family's or provider's representative. For purposes
of this subsection, the signature of an accused family is the signature of the
accused individual within the family,
(g) The accused family or provider or the
accused family's or provider's representative may
(1) examine the contents of the family's or
provider's file, and all documents and records to be used at the intentional
program violation hearing, at a reasonable time before the date of the hearing,
and during the hearing;
(2) at the
family's or provider's own expense, present at the hearing witnesses and
documents pertinent to the case;
(3) establish relevant facts and
circumstances;
(4) present oral and
written arguments pertinent to the case; and
(5) question or refute any testimony or
evidence, including the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses.
(h) If the accused family or
provider is notified in advance, a hearing under 7 AAC 49 for a family or a
hearing for a provider under
7
AAC 41.443 that is based on the same or related
circumstances as an intentional program violation hearing under this section
may be combined by the administrative law judge into a single hearing.
(i) The administrative law judge
shall render a decision within 90 calendar days after the date the accused
family or provider received the notice of the hearing in accordance with (a) of
this section. However, if the accused family or provider or the family's or
provider's representative is granted a postponement, the 90-day time limit is
extended for the same number of days that the hearing is postponed.
(j) If the administrative law judge
determines that a family or provider has committed an intentional program
violation, no further administrative remedy exists. However, the family or
provider is entitled to seek relief in a court having appropriate jurisdiction.
Notes
Authority:AS 47.05.010
AS 47.25.001
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.