Ariz. Admin. Code § R14-2-2412 - Cost-effectiveness
A. An affected
utility shall ensure that the incremental benefits to society of the affected
utility's overall DSM portfolio exceed the incremental costs to society of the
DSM portfolio.
B. The Societal Test
shall be used to determine cost-effectiveness.
C. The analysis of a DSM program's or DSM
measure's cost-effectiveness may include:
1.
Costs and benefits associated with reliability, improved system operations,
environmental impacts, and customer service;
2. Savings of both natural gas and
electricity; and
3. Any uncertainty
about future streams of costs or benefits.
D. An affected utility shall make a good
faith effort to quantify water consumption savings and air emission reductions,
while other environmental costs or the value of environmental improvements
shall be estimated in physical terms when practical but may be expressed
qualitatively. An affected utility, Staff, or any party may propose monetized
benefits and costs if supported by appropriate documentation or
analyses.
E. Market transformation
programs shall be analyzed for cost-effectiveness by measuring market effects
compared to program costs.
F.
Educational programs shall be analyzed for cost-effectiveness based on
estimated energy and peak demand savings resulting from increased awareness
about energy use and opportunities for saving energy.
G. Research and development and pilot
programs are not required to demonstrate cost-effectiveness.
H. An affected utility's low-income customer
program portfolio shall be cost-effective, but costs attributable to necessary
health and safety measures shall not be used in the calculation.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.