Ariz. Admin. Code § R14-2-2512 - Cost-effectiveness
A. An affected
utility shall ensure that the incremental benefits to society of the affected
utility's overall group of DSM programs exceed the incremental costs to society
of the overall group of DSM programs.
B. The Societal Test shall be used to
determine cost-effectiveness.
C.
The analysis of a DSM program's or DSM measure's cost-effectiveness may
include:
1. Costs and benefits associated
with reliability, improved system operations, environmental impacts, and
customer service;
2. Savings of
both gas and electricity; and
3.
Any uncertainty about future streams of costs or benefits.
D. An affected utility shall make a good
faith effort to quantify water consumption savings and air emission reductions
resulting from implementation of DSM programs, while other environmental costs
or the value of environmental improvements shall be estimated in physical terms
when practical but may be expressed qualitatively. An affected utility, Staff,
or any party may propose monetized benefits and costs if supported by
appropriate documentation or analyses.
E. Market transformation programs shall be
analyzed for cost-effectiveness by measuring market effects compared to program
costs.
F. Educational programs
shall be analyzed for cost-effectiveness based on estimated energy and peak
demand savings resulting from increased awareness about energy use and
opportunities for saving energy.
G.
Research and development and pilot programs are not required to demonstrate
cost-effectiveness.
H. An affected
utility's low-income customer program portfolio shall be cost-effective, but
costs attributable to necessary health and safety measures shall not be used in
the calculation.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.