Ariz. Admin. Code § R18-12-263.02 - Corrective Action Plan
A. When
required under
R18-12-263(C) or
(D), an owner or operator shall prepare a CAP
that protects public health and the environment. The Department shall apply the
following factors to determine if the CAP protects public health and the
environment:
1. The physical and chemical
characteristics of the chemicals of concern, including toxicity, persistence,
and potential for migration;
2. The
hydrologic and geologic characteristics of the facility and the surrounding
area;
3. The proximity, quality,
and current and future uses of nearby groundwater and nearby surface
water;
4. The potential effects of
residual contamination on nearby groundwater and nearby surface
water;
5. The risk characterization
for current and potential receptors; and
B. CAP contents. An owner or operator shall
prepare a CAP in a format provided by the Department that includes:
1. The extent of contamination known at the
time of the CAP submission, including a current LUST site classification form,
as described in
R18-12-261.01(E);
2. A description of any responses to soil,
surface water, or groundwater contamination initiated;
3. A determination of the foreseeable and
most beneficial use of surface water or groundwater within one-quarter mile of
the outermost boundaries of the contaminated water, if a Tier 2 or Tier 3
evaluation is used for the corrective action standard for either medium. In
making this determination the owner or operator shall:
a. Conduct a survey of property owners and
other persons using or having rights to use water within one-quarter mile of
the outermost extent of contaminated water; and
b. Include within the CAP the names and
addresses of persons surveyed and the results;
4. A description of goals and expected
results;
5. The corrective action
standard for each chemical of concern in each affected medium, and the tier
evaluation documents;
6. If active
remedial methodologies are proposed the owner or operator shall:
a. Describe any permits required for the
operation of each remediation technology and system.
b. Describe, in narrative form, the
conceptual design, operation, and total estimated cost of three remedial
alternatives proposed to perform corrective actions on contaminated soil,
surface water or groundwater. Also include data and conclusions supporting the
selection and design of each technology and system, including criteria for
evaluation of effectiveness in meeting stated objectives and an abandonment
plan. The information described in this subsection is not required if the
remedial technology in the CAP is limited to approval of corrective action
standards developed under Tier 2 or Tier 3 evaluation.
c. Justify the selection of the remedial
alternative chosen for the contamination at and from the LUST site. The owner
or operator shall consider site-specific conditions and select a remedial
alternative that best meets all of the remediation criteria listed in A.R.S.
§
49-1005(D).
d. Provide schedules for the implementation,
operation, and demobilization of any remediation technology and periodic
reports as described in
R18-12-263(G) to
the Department.
7. The
reasonably foreseeable effects of residual contamination on groundwater and
surface water.
8. Additional
information necessary to analyze the site-specific conditions and effectiveness
of the proposed remedial response, which may include, but is not limited to a
feasibility study.
C.
Modification of CAP. The owner or operator shall modify the CAP upon written
request of the Department to meet the requirements of subsections (A) and (B).
The request for modification shall describe any necessary modification and its
rationale. The owner or operator shall respond to the request in writing within
45 calendar days of receipt, or a longer time period approved by the
Department. If the requested modification is not made within 45 days, the
Department shall disapprove the CAP, and notify the owner or operator in
writing under subsection (H)(2).
D.
Preliminary CAP approval. If the requirements of subsections (B) and (C) are
met, the Department shall provide written notice to the owner or operator that
the CAP is complete, and provide public notice required by
R18-12-264.01.
E. Implementation before approval. An owner
or operator may, in the interest of minimizing environmental contamination and
promoting more effective remediation, begin implementation of the remediation
technologies, in the CAP, before the plan is approved by the Department, if the
owner or operator:
1. Informs the Department
in writing before implementation;
2. Complies with any conditions imposed by
the Department consistent with the provisions of subsection (A), including
halting any activity or mitigating adverse consequences from implementation;
and
3. Obtains all necessary
permits and approvals for the remediation activities.
F. Modification due to public comment. An
owner or operator shall modify the CAP upon written request of the Department
that modification is required because of public comment received. The request
shall describe any necessary modification and its rationale. The owner or
operator shall respond to the modification request within 45 calendar days
after receipt. If the requested modification is not made in writing within 45
days, the Department may disapprove the CAP and notify the owner or operator in
writing described in subsection (H)(2).
G. Conditions for CAP approval. The
Department shall approve a CAP only if the following conditions are met:
1. The CAP contains all elements required in
subsections (B), (C), and (F), or the Department makes a determination that it
has enough information to make an informed decision to approve the CAP;
and
2. The CAP demonstrates that
the corrective actions described are necessary, reasonable, cost-effective,
technically feasible and meet the requirements of A.R.S. §
49-1005.
H. Notice of CAP approval. The Department
shall notify the owner or operator, and any person that comments on the CAP, in
writing that it is approving or disapproving the CAP as follows:
1. If the conditions in subsections (G)(1)
and (G)(2) are satisfied, the Department shall approve the CAP and notify the
owner or operator. If the approved CAP includes a corrective action standard
for water that is based on a Tier 2 or Tier 3 evaluation, the Department shall
send a copy of the notice to the Arizona Department of Water Resources, the
applicable county, and municipality where the CAP will be implemented, and
water service providers and persons having water rights that may be impacted by
the release. The notice shall also be sent to any persons submitting written or
oral comments on the proposed CAP. The notice shall include any conditions upon
which the approval is based and an explanation of the process for resolving
disagreements over the determination under A.R.S. §
49-1091.
2. If the conditions of subsections (G)(1) or
(2) are not satisfied, the Department shall disapprove the CAP and notify the
owner or operator in writing of the disapproval. The Department shall send the
notice to any persons submitting written or oral comments on the proposed CAP.
The notice shall include an explanation of the rationale for the disapproval
and an explanation of the process for resolving disagreements under A.R.S.
§
49-1091.
I. CAP implementation. If the CAP is
approved, the owner or operator shall begin implementation in accordance with
the approved schedule.
J. CAP
termination. The Department may terminate an implemented CAP, and may require a
new CAP if the corrective action standards of the approved CAP are not being
achieved. The Department shall provide notice to the owner or operator and the
public under
R18-12-264.01 if termination of
the CAP is being considered.
K.
Revisions to an approved CAP. The Department may approve revisions to an
approved CAP without additional public notice unless the revision involves
alternative remediation methodologies, or may adversely affect public health or
the environment.
L. New CAP. The
Department shall require a new CAP under
R18-12-263(C) or
(D) if a revision involves an alternative
remediation methodology or may adversely affect public health or the
environment.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.