Ariz. Admin. Code § R18-15-1003 - Water Conservation Grant Fund Order and Priority
A. The Authority shall determine the Order
and Priority of applications by applying the evaluative criteria listed in:
1. A.R.S. §
49-1334; and
2. The Request for Grant
Applications.
B. For each
funding cycle, the Authority shall evaluate and summarize each Grant
application received and develop an analysis that provides recommendations to
the Water Conservation Grant Committee. The analysis shall include, as
applicable:
1. The scope, size, and budget of
the proposed Program or project, including as much cost detail as
possible;
2. The estimated water
savings of the Proposed Program or Project;
3. A summary of any previous assistance
provided by the Authority to the applicant; and
4. Any other information deemed necessary by
the Authority.
C. In
evaluating applications to the Water Conservation Grant Fund, the Authority
shall apply following definitions:
1.
"Program" means activities that occur in multiple phases over an established
timeframe, and that may result in multiple deliverables.
2. "Project" means activities that are
confined to a particular time and place, and that result in a single
deliverable.
D. The Water
Conservation Grant Committee shall review all eligible Grant applications
received during a given funding cycle and provide recommendations to the Board
regarding the order and priority of the Grant applications. Specific numeric
ranking is not required.
E. The
Water Conservation Grant Committee shall provide an opportunity for public
comment on the applications during a public meeting.
F. The Water Conservation Grant Committee may
recommend the adjustment of the budgets of the applications received
individually or collectively.
G.
The Water Conservation Grant Committee may require an Applicant to provide
additional information before making a recommendation to the Board.
H. The Authority may remove an application
from consideration under a given funding cycle under one or more of the
following circumstances:
1. The project was
financed from another source;
2.
The proposed project is no longer an eligible project;
3. The applicant requests removal;
4. The applicant is no longer an eligible
applicant; or
5. The applicant did
not update, modify, correct, or resubmit an Application Form in Response to a
Request from the Authority.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.