Ariz. Admin. Code § R18-2-1423 - Criteria and Procedures: Interim Period Reductions in Ozone and CO Areas (TIP)
A. A TIP shall
contribute to emissions reductions in ozone and CO nonattainment areas. This
criterion applies during the interim and transitional periods only, except as
otherwise provided in
R18-2-1436 . It applies to the net
effect on emissions of all projects contained in a new or revised TIP. This
criterion may be satisfied if a regional emissions analysis is performed as
described in subsections (B) through (F).
B. Determine the analysis years for which
emissions are to be estimated. The first analysis year shall be no later than
the first milestone year (1995 in CO nonattainment areas and 1996 in ozone
nonattainment areas). The analysis years shall be no more than 10 years apart.
The second analysis year shall be either the attainment year for the area or,
if the attainment year is the same as the first analysis year or earlier, the
second analysis year shall be at least five years beyond the first analysis
year. The last year of the transportation plan's forecast period shall also be
an analysis year.
C. Define the
Baseline scenario as the future transportation system that would result from
current programs, composed of all of the following, except that projects listed
in R18-2-1434 and
R18-2-1435 need not be explicitly
considered:
1. All in-place regionally
significant highway and transit facilities, services, and activities.
2. All ongoing travel demand management or
transportation system management activities.
3. Completion of all regionally significant
transportation projects, regardless of funding source, which are currently
under construction or are undergoing right-of-way acquisition, except for
hardship acquisition and protective buying; come from the first three years of
the previously conforming TIP; or have completed the NEPA process. For the
first conformity determination on the TIP after November 24, 1993, a project
may not be included in the Baseline scenario if one of the following major
steps has not occurred within the most recent three-year period:
a. NEPA process completion.
b. Start of final design.
c. Acquisition of a significant portion of
the right-of-way.
d. Approval of
the plans, specifications, and estimates. Such a project shall be included in
the Action scenario, as described in subsection (D).
D. Define the Action scenario as
the future transportation system that will result from the implementation of
the proposed TIP and other expected regionally significant transportation
projects in the nonattainment area in the time-frame of the transportation
plan. It will include all of the following, except that projects listed in
R18-2-1434 and
R18-2-1435 need not be explicitly
considered:
1. All facilities, services, and
activities in the Baseline scenario;
2. Completion of all TCMs and regionally
significant transportation projects, including facilities, services, and
activities, included in the proposed TIP, except that regulatory TCMs may not
be assumed to begin at a future time unless the regulation is already adopted
by the enforcing jurisdiction or the TCM is contained in the applicable
implementation plan;
3. All travel
demand management programs and transportation system management activities
known to the MPO, but not included in the applicable implementation plan or
utilizing any federal funding or approval, which have been fully adopted or
funded by the enforcing jurisdiction or sponsoring agency since the last
conformity determination on the TIP;
4. The incremental effects of any travel
demand management programs and transportation system management activities
known to the MPO, but not included in the applicable implementation plan or
utilizing any federal funding or approval, which were adopted or funded prior
to the date of the last conformity determination on the TIP, but which have
been modified since then to be more stringent or effective;
5. Completion of all expected regionally
significant highway and transit projects which are not from a conforming
transportation plan and TIP;
6.
Completion of all expected regionally significant non-FHWA/FTA highway and
transit projects that have clear funding sources and commitments leading toward
their implementation and completion by the analysis year.
E. Estimate the emissions predicted to result
in each analysis year from travel on the transportation systems defined by the
Baseline and Action scenarios, and determine the difference in regional VOC and
NOx emissions (unless the Administrator determines that additional reductions
of NOx would not contribute to attainment) between the two scenarios for ozone
nonattainment areas and the difference in CO emissions between the two
scenarios for CO nonattainment areas. The analysis shall be performed for each
of the analysis years according to the requirements of
R18-2-1430 . Emissions in
milestone years which are between analysis years may be determined by
interpolation.
F. This criterion is
met if the regional VOC and NOx emissions in ozone nonattainment areas and CO
emissions in CO nonattainment areas predicted in the Action scenario are less
than the emissions predicted from the Baseline scenario in each analysis year,
and if this can reasonably be expected to be true in the period between the
analysis years. The regional analysis shall show that the Action scenario
contributes to a reduction in emissions from the 1990 emissions by any nonzero
amount.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.