Ariz. Admin. Code § R18-2-702 - General Provisions
A. The
provisions of this Article shall only apply to a source that is all of the
following:
1. An existing source, as defined
in R18-2-101;
2. A point source. For the purposes of this
Section, "point source" means a source of air contaminants that has an
identifiable plume or emissions point; and
3. A stationary source, as defined in
R18-2-101.
B. Except as otherwise provided in this
Chapter relating to specific types of sources, the opacity of any plume or
effluent, from a source described in subsection (A), as determined by Reference
Method 9 in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, shall not be:
1. Greater than 20% in an area that is
nonattainment or maintenance for any particulate matter standard, unless an
alternative opacity limit is approved by the Director and the Administrator as
provided in subsections (D) and (E), after February 2, 2004;
2. Greater than 40% in an area that is
attainment or unclassifiable for each particulate matter standard;
and
3. After April 23, 2006,
greater than 20% in any area that is attainment or unclassifiable for each
particulate matter standard except as provided in subsections (D) and
(E).
C. If the presence
of uncombined water is the only reason for an exceedance of any visible
emissions requirement in this Article, the exceedance shall not constitute a
violation of the applicable opacity limit.
D. A person owning or operating a source may
petition the Director for an alternative applicable opacity limit. The petition
shall be submitted to ADEQ by May 15, 2004.
1.
The petition shall contain:
a. Documentation
that the affected facility and any associated air pollution control equipment
are incapable of being adjusted or operated to meet the applicable opacity
standard. This includes:
i. Relevant
information on the process operating conditions and the control devices
operating conditions during the opacity or stack tests;
ii. A detailed statement or report
demonstrating that the source investigated all practicable means of reducing
opacity and utilized control technology that is reasonably available
considering technical and economic feasibility; and
iii. An explanation why the source cannot
meet the present opacity limit although it is in compliance with the applicable
particulate mass emission rule.
b. If there is an opacity monitor, any
certification and audit reports required by all applicable subparts in 40 CFR
60 and in Appendix B, Performance Specification 1.
c. A verification by a responsible official
of the source of the truth, accuracy, and completeness of the petition. This
certification shall state that, based on information and belief formed after
reasonable inquiry, the statements and information in the document are true,
accurate, and complete.
2. If the unit for which the alternative
opacity standard is being applied is subject to a stack test, the petition
shall also include:
a. Documentation that the
source conducted concurrent EPA Reference Method stack testing and visible
emissions readings or is utilizing a continuous opacity monitor. The
particulate mass emission test results shall clearly demonstrate compliance
with the applicable particulate mass emission limitation by being at least 10%
below that limit. For multiple units that are normally operated together and
whose emissions vent through a single stack, the source shall conduct
simultaneous particulate testing of each unit. Each control device shall be in
good operating condition and operated consistent with good practices for
minimizing emissions.
b. Evidence
that the source conducted the stack tests according to
R18-2-312, and that they were
witnessed by the Director or the Director's agent or representative.
c. Evidence that the affected facility and
any associated air pollution control equipment were operated and maintained to
the maximum extent practicable to minimize the opacity of emissions during the
stack tests.
3. If the
source for which the alternative opacity standard is being applied is located
in a nonattainment area, the petitioner shall include all the information
listed in subsections (D)(1) and (D)(2), and in addition:
a. In subsection (D)(1)(a)(ii), the detailed
statement or report shall demonstrate that the alternative opacity limit
fulfills the Clean Air Act requirement for reasonably available control
technology; and
b. In subsection
(D)(2)(b), the stack tests shall be conducted with an opportunity for the
Administrator or the Administrator's agent or representative to be
present.
E.
If the Director receives a petition under subsection (D) the Director shall
approve or deny the petition as provided below by October 15, 2004:
1. If the petition is approved under
subsection (D)(1) or (D)(2), the Director shall include an alternative opacity
limit in a proposed significant permit revision for the source under
R18-2-320 and
R18-2-330 . The proposed
alternative opacity limit shall be set at a value that has been demonstrated
during, and not extrapolated from, testing, except that an alternative opacity
limit under this Section shall not be greater than 40%. For multiple units that
are normally operated together and whose emissions vent through a single stack,
any new alternative opacity limit shall reflect the opacity level at the common
stack exit, and not individual in-duct opacity levels.
2. If the petition is approved under
subsection (D)(3), the Director shall include an alternative opacity limit in a
proposed revision to the applicable implementation plan, and submit the
proposed revision to EPA for review and approval. The proposed alternative
opacity limit shall be set at a value that has been demonstrated during, and
not extrapolated from, testing, except that the alternative opacity limit shall
not be greater than 40%.
3. If the
petition is denied, the source shall either comply with the 20% opacity limit
or apply for a significant permit revision to incorporate a compliance schedule
under R18-2-309(5)(c)(iii)
by April 23, 2006.
4. A source does not have to petition for an
alternative opacity limit under subsection (D) to enter into a revised
compliance schedule under
R18-2-309(5)(c).
F. The Director, Administrator,
source owner or operator, inspector or other interested party shall determine
the process weight rate, as used in this Article, as follows:
1. For continuous or long run, steady-state
process sources, the process weight rate is the total process weight for the
entire period of continuous operation, or for a typical portion of that period,
divided by the number of hours of the period, or portion of hours of that
period.
2. For cyclical or batch
process sources, the process weight rate is the total process weight for a
period which covers a complete operation or an integral number of cycles,
divided by the hours of actual process operation during the period.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.