Ariz. Admin. Code § R18-9-J659 - Class VI; Area of Review and Corrective Action
A. The area of
review is the region surrounding the geologic sequestration project where USDWs
may be endangered by the injection activity. The area of review is delineated
using computational modeling that accounts for the physical and chemical
properties of all phases of the injected carbon dioxide stream and is based on
available site characterization, monitoring, and operational data.
B. The owner or operator of a Class VI well
must prepare, maintain, and comply with a plan to delineate the area of review
for a proposed geologic sequestration project, periodically reevaluate the
delineation, and perform corrective action that meets the requirements of this
Section and is acceptable to the Director. The requirement to maintain and
implement an approved plan is directly enforceable regardless of whether the
requirement is a condition of the permit. As a part of the permit application
for approval by the Director, the owner or operator must submit an area of
review and corrective action plan that includes the following information:
1. The method for delineating the area of
review that meets the requirements of subsection (C) of this Section, including
the model to be used, assumptions that will be made, and the site
characterization data on which the model will be based.
2. A description of:
a. The minimum fixed frequency, not to exceed
five years, at which the owner or operator proposes to reevaluate the area of
review;
b. The monitoring and
operational conditions that would warrant a reevaluation of the area of review
prior to the next scheduled reevaluation as determined by the minimum fixed
frequency established in subsection (B)(2)(a) of this Section.
c. How monitoring and operational data will
be used to inform an area of review reevaluation; and
d. How corrective action will be conducted to
meet the requirements of subsection (D) of this Section, including what
corrective action will be performed prior to injection and what, if any,
portions of the area of review will have corrective action addressed on a
phased basis and how the phasing will be determined; how corrective action will
be adjusted if there are changes in the area of review; and how site access
will be guaranteed for future corrective action.
C. Owners or operators of Class VI
wells must perform the following actions to delineate the area of review and
identify all wells that require corrective action:
1. Predict, using existing site
characterization, monitoring and operational data, and computational modeling,
the projected lateral and vertical migration of the carbon dioxide plume and
formation fluids in the subsurface from the commencement of injection
activities until the plume movement ceases, until pressure differentials
sufficient to cause the movement of injected fluids or formation fluids into a
USDW are no longer present, or until the end of a fixed time period as
determined by the Director. The model must:
a.
Be based on detailed geologic data collected to characterize the injection zone
zones, confining zone or zones and any additional zones; and anticipated
operating data, including injection pressures, rates, and total volumes over
the proposed life of the geologic sequestration project;
b. Take into account any geologic
heterogeneities, other discontinuities, data quality, and their possible impact
on model predictions; and
c.
Consider potential migration through faults, fractures, and artificial
penetrations.
2. Using
methods approved by the Director, identify all penetrations, including active
and abandoned wells and underground mines, in the area of review that may
penetrate the confining zone or zones. Provide a description of each well's
type, construction, date drilled, location, depth, record of plugging and/or
completion, and any additional information the Director may require;
and
3. Determine which abandoned
wells in the area of review have been plugged in a manner that prevents the
movement of carbon dioxide or other fluids that may endanger USDWs, including
use of materials compatible with the carbon dioxide stream.
D. Owners or operators of Class VI
wells must perform corrective action on all wells in the area of review that
are determined to need corrective action, using methods designed to prevent the
movement of fluid into or between USDWs, including use of materials compatible
with the carbon dioxide stream, where appropriate.
E. At the minimum fixed frequency, not to
exceed five years, as specified in the area of review and corrective action
plan, or when monitoring and operational conditions warrant, owners or
operators must:
1. Reevaluate the area of
review in the same manner specified in subsection (C)(1) of this
Section;
2. Identify all wells in
the reevaluated area of review that require corrective action in the same
manner specified in subsection (C) of this Section;
3. Perform corrective action on wells
requiring corrective action in the reevaluated area of review in the same
manner specified in subsection (C) of this Section; and
4. Submit an amended area of review and
corrective action plan or demonstrate to the Director through monitoring data
and modeling results that no amendment to the area of review and corrective
action plan is needed. Any amendments to the area of review and corrective
action plan must be approved by the Director, must be incorporated into the
permit, and are subject to the permit modification requirements under
R18-9-C632 or
R18-9-C633, as
appropriate.
F. The
emergency and remedial response plan and the demonstration of financial
responsibility must account for the area of review delineated as specified in
subsection (C)(1) of this Section or the most recently evaluated area of review
delineated under subsection (E) of this Section, regardless of whether or not
corrective action in the area of review is phased.
G. All modeling inputs and data used to
support area of review reevaluations under subsection (E) of this Section shall
be retained for 10 years.
Notes
State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. More comparison features will be added as we have more versions to compare.
No prior version found.